Started By
Message

re: Manziel's 2nd half numbers?

Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:17 pm to
Posted by maclauer
Member since Nov 2011
4765 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

Im not reading this thread. Cliff notes?

Anthony Johnson > Manziel > Bama > LSU



so we have a flame war infinite loop. also throw in UGA, somehow.
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

it's not unlucky if you do it in every fricking game


By your logic, it wasn't luck that we came out to a strong lead since we do that "every fricking game".

Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Im not reading this thread. Cliff notes?


It has been brought to our attention that:

Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46507 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

so we have a flame war infinite loop. also throw in UGA, somehow.


Par for the course
Posted by maclauer
Member since Nov 2011
4765 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

By your logic, it wasn't luck that we came out to a strong lead since we do that "every fricking game".

no, it wasn't luck. great first half team. awful second half team.

Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46507 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:23 pm to
To be fair, its pretty much impossible to maintain our normal first quarters for a whole game. Wed have beaten both Bama and LSU by 40+. Just not gonna happen, everyone makes a run.

Id rather start fast than slow, though, and outside of two games, we made enough plays to win.
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

no, it wasn't luck. great first half team. awful second half team.


There's no arguing that our second half needs improvement but to say that we scored our points because every ball bounced our way is incorrect since it is how we do things.

I do blame Sumlin for keeping in our horrible kicker that would've been the difference in our losses.
Posted by ImperialPalace
Galveston, Texas
Member since Oct 2012
2888 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

maclauer
What happened to your sports betting threads on the MSB?

For that matter, I don't see anyone making those type of threads anymore.

I guess everyone's bankroll went busto.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

Why the frick don't you come back with a legitimate retort instead of this baby back bullshite.


They are incapable of anything but talking shite. That's okay - the coming season will be here soon enough and it'll come crashing down on them early.
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:34 pm to
We only respond to the bullshite you idiots keep starting on here. We never just talk shite randomly.
Posted by cramps
Member since Oct 2012
2085 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:34 pm to
When your starters have to play so much and there is less depth to pick up the slack, these things tend to happen. That is why Larry Jackson is a badass mofo and deserves so much credit for getting 11 wins, along with the players that sold out and puked their guts out constantly.
This post was edited on 4/23/13 at 11:36 pm
Posted by maclauer
Member since Nov 2011
4765 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

What happened to your sports betting threads on the MSB?

For that matter, I don't see anyone making those type of threads anymore.

I guess everyone's bankroll went busto.

admins anchored after our threads went 20+ pages daily (for gifs and IMing), this coincided with a rough stretch for the board, and memphs and dg quit gambling.

I do bet a small amount on baseball, but those threads would be a ghost-town so I don't see the point in starting them.
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

We only respond to the bull shite you idiots keep starting on here. We never just talk shite randomly.


My sarcasm & trash talk meter goes up instantly on threads like these - if they wanted a serious discussion, why do they start it with trash-talking?

HMMMMMMMMM.....
Posted by ImperialPalace
Galveston, Texas
Member since Oct 2012
2888 posts
Posted on 4/23/13 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

admins anchored after our threads went 20+ pages daily (for gifs and IMing), this coincided with a rough stretch for the board, and memphs and dg quit gambling.

I do bet a small amount on baseball, but those threads would be a ghost-town so I don't see the point in starting them.
I mostly lurked but enjoyed reading other people's perspective on the day's plays.

As for the remainer of the thread, well, it made for an entertaining read. In the time that I paid attention, memphs & dg ran quite well.

If you ever start up a baseball thread, you'll be assured of at least one lurker. Baseball is not my forte.
Posted by maclauer
Member since Nov 2011
4765 posts
Posted on 4/24/13 at 12:11 am to
quote:

If you ever start up a baseball thread, you'll be assured of at least one lurker. Baseball is not my forte.

I'm a Rays and Braves fan, so I pretty much just bet Braves MLs and Matt Moore unders (I thought before the season he would be the ace of the staff and a Cy Young candidate).

I don't trust the Rays offense enough to ML them yet



/hijack
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80110 posts
Posted on 4/24/13 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Ya'll wanted them and now you have to live with that choice.


Yet here you are. Shouldn't you be trolling Big12Rant or the site of one of your actual rivals? (such as Baylor)
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter