Started By
Message

re: LSU looks like they used to

Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:38 pm to
Posted by 03GeeTee
Oklahomastan
Member since Oct 2010
3371 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:38 pm to
Ezekiel Elliot
Posted by Wind Rivers Tiger
Wyoming
Member since Sep 2011
1033 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:46 pm to
And we're too "smarting" for you laddie.
Posted by thekid
Anna, Tx
Member since May 2006
3937 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:49 pm to
It concerns me how ole miss knew about some our plays based on watching film and totally blew them up...that reverse to chark comes to mind...we need to do something different from those formations because if OM caught that stuff on tape, you know Bama will to...
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32634 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

Our defense is too smarting for them
Lol.
Posted by Pencil Stick
Member since Oct 2016
79 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Our defense is too smarting for them.


Too smarting, you say?

The main difference is that if a defense stacks the box we're passing. That forces the safeties back, then we gash them. Bama is very good at stopping folks from running without stacking the box, so we'll see how that works.
Posted by PT24-7
Member since Jul 2013
4368 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

us


Holy Cow, I'm guessing you're a defensive player?
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34662 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Have there been any noticeable changes in the actual playcalling or just better execution?


Someone checked the rulebook and found the TE was, indeed, an eligible receiver.
Posted by LSUERDOC
Member since Jul 2013
2608 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 6:50 am to
quote:

...quality opponents...


You miss CLM dont you?
Posted by FightinTiga
Pumpkin Center
Member since Feb 2009
20745 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 6:51 am to
How much???
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33939 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 6:55 am to
We haven't changed the playbook or the balance of run-pass plays. What we've done is taken steps to be less obvious. That involves two changes:

1. Running when you think we're going to pass and passing when you think we're going to run (really high level strategy, I know, but Les didn't do this toward the end).

2. Mixing up the formations within personnel groupings (so you can't tell which play we're running by the personnel we break the huddle with).

These two *very* basic changes, plus somewhat competent QB play, have really opened up the offense because teams can't tee off on the run anymore.

This post was edited on 10/24/16 at 6:56 am
Posted by 337Tigah
Premium Access
Member since Aug 2014
2563 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 7:00 am to
Our defense doesn't mind being on the field. They usually thrive in the second half. The difference is when the defense knows that they won't have to literally win us the game by scoring on par with our offense, their attitudes are better and they just go out and do their jobs.
Posted by NUTZ
Member since Feb 2016
21 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 7:35 am to
Oh man, a rare productive thread. Have an upvote.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30878 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 7:38 am to
I'm all for LSU being back. The best games, during the 2008-2012 stretch, were Alabama vs LSU. Yeah, it meant more heartburn, and we lost some, but they were much more interesting games. The 2011 Game of the Century and the screen pass to Yeldon in 2012 for the comeback are two amazing games.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38274 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 7:39 am to
quote:

commitment to spreading the ball around


^^^This. The emergence of DJ Chark has been absolutely incredible to watch. The fact he was sitting the bench never seeing the field when Miles was here should tell you everything.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43823 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 8:04 am to
As a LSU fan, I'm seeing run/pass option plays for the first time in over a decade. It's only one of the minor tweaks that has made a huge difference.
Posted by Brosef Stalin17
Member since Sep 2014
1090 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 8:06 am to
quote:

They will not move the ball on us. Our defense is too smarting for them. But they are better with Miles gone! Top 15!


not if you play defense

edit: I now see how unoriginal my comment is
This post was edited on 10/24/16 at 8:10 am
Posted by TigerNutwhack
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
4134 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:00 am to
To me, it seems the biggest change, besides more energy and generally better execution, is the offensive philosophy. Under Miles, it was "Here's what we are gonna do, try and stop us", which works when you vastly out talent the other team. It's changed to be more modern where it looks to exploit match ups, get the defense off balance early, and then impose your will later in the game.
Posted by TheRaid
Currently Living in South Alabama
Member since Jan 2013
1304 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 10:15 am to
I see a significant difference in LF. Against Wisconsin, for example, he ran like a wuss more interested in his future in the NFL than like an SEC RB. Now that he has decided not to be a wuss, LSU looks pretty good. Still resent him for not trying hard against the BIG10.
This post was edited on 10/24/16 at 10:16 am
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35319 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

I see a significant difference in LF. Against Wisconsin, for example, he ran like a wuss more interested in his future in the NFL than like an SEC RB. Now that he has decided not to be a wuss, LSU looks pretty good. Still resent him for not trying hard against the BIG10.



2shiny4me
Posted by madddoggydawg
Metairie
Member since Jun 2013
6567 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 10:48 am to
The changes have been noticeable.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter