Started By
Message
re: LSU front 7
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:36 am to skirpnasty
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:36 am to skirpnasty
The answer to your question about stopping Dak is simple...CHEST, which cannot be measured...ok, maybe it can be measured but LSU D-Line has it and the Cowbells don't.
1
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:36 am to Jenar Boy
quote:
On farking phone driving
Don't wreck on account of the Rant.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:45 am to RB10
quote:
The same can be said of LSU. If they go to an I-form with 3 wide like they did against Wisconsin that will leave only 5 in the box for state.
That leaves 6 in the box and most likely 7 until proven it's the wrong move. When has Jennings has proven capable of beating someone with his arm?
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:46 am to Stuttgart Tiger
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:46 am to skirpnasty
quote:
The Tigers have a history a of strong defensive front seven
We are still strong at DE and OLB just weak interior and MLB.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:46 am to RHSTiger98
quote:
The answer to your question about stopping Dak is simple...CHEST, which cannot be measured...ok, maybe it can be measured but LSU D-Line has it and the Cowbells don't.
This -- about Dak -- is hilarious. You'll find out why.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:48 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
National FBS rankings through games of September 13, 2014:
Total Defense
3. LSU
Team Passing Efficiency Defense
1. LSU
Passing Yards Allowed
3. LSU
Red Zone Defense
3. LSU
Scoring Defense
2. LSU
First Downs Defense
10. LSU
quote:
3rd Down Conversion Pct Defense
10. LSU
Dammit Chavis!
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:48 am to engie
quote:
That leaves 6 in the box and most likely 7 until proven it's the wrong move. When has Jennings has proven capable of beating someone with his arm?
Uh....not sure if serious, but if State's plan is to leave a CB on Dural with only one safety over the top, then this game is going to get out of hand pretty early.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:51 am to skirpnasty
quote:
It is indeed. It's not your secondary that will be tested
But we'll start stunting like the 2nd half of Wisconsin Game, if needed.
If we make you one-dimensional, trouble for MSU.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:52 am to skirpnasty
LSU was without 4 DTs in the Wisconsin game. There were communication issues in the first game that improved as the game wore on. After Gordon's 67 yard run, LSU has given up an average of 2.2 yards per play. The DTs settled down and LB play has greatly improved.
LSU has massive talent in the front 7. The talent is getting experience and has gotten better with each quarter of play. The Secondary is just nasty.
Are you basing everything on the first 33 minutes of the first game and certain breakdowns that happened then that were corrected in the same game? Every team has had breakdowns at certain points. The front 7 fixed it in the very first game and have been dominant since.
You can discount the Sam Houston game, but holding ULM to 91 yards for the game speaks to a dominant defense, no matter how you want to look at it.
The Front 7 is not as great as the past - yet. But they are talented and getting better. Miss. St. will have their hands full.
LSU has massive talent in the front 7. The talent is getting experience and has gotten better with each quarter of play. The Secondary is just nasty.
Are you basing everything on the first 33 minutes of the first game and certain breakdowns that happened then that were corrected in the same game? Every team has had breakdowns at certain points. The front 7 fixed it in the very first game and have been dominant since.
You can discount the Sam Houston game, but holding ULM to 91 yards for the game speaks to a dominant defense, no matter how you want to look at it.
The Front 7 is not as great as the past - yet. But they are talented and getting better. Miss. St. will have their hands full.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:53 am to engie
C'mon man, we've all seen this movie, and we know how it ends.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:54 am to UpToPar
quote:
Uh....not sure if serious, but if State's plan is to leave a CB on Dural with only one safety over the top, then this game is going to get out of hand pretty early.
You really think he requires triple coverage with a QB that won't have time for shite in the set that was described and completes 51.9% of his passes?
LOL
This post was edited on 9/18/14 at 10:59 am
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:54 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
And so, the second poster who thinks stupid and ignorant are synonymous arises.
I'm still waiting on a link for this.
Why are you assuming he's not talking about relativity to football. Are you stupid?
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:57 am to RHSTiger98
Why are you so worried about it then?
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:00 am to engie
quote:
You really think he requires triple coverage with a QB that won't have time for shite in the set that was described?
So, you are going to play man with one safety over the top AND blitz your LBs? That should work well.
State isn't going to force the ball out of Jennings' hand early without blitzing. Our O-Line has done great in pass protection this year. If state only has one safety over the top Dural is going to run by the CB all night.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:01 am to engie
quote:
You really think he requires triple coverage with a QB that won't have time for shite in the set that was described and completes 51.9% of his passes
You obviously have all the answers....MSU in a rout
Be prepared to be disappointed
Again
This post was edited on 9/18/14 at 11:01 am
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:03 am to engie
Oh, I'm not worried about it, I was just answering the OPs question. You didn't like my answer apparently.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:03 am to UpToPar
quote:
Our O-Line has done great in pass protection this year.
According to your 24/7 writer your O-Line hasn't been good at anything so far. I'll take his word over yours.
Nothing personal, but he does get paid...
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:05 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
According to your 24/7 writer your O-Line hasn't been good at anything so far. I'll take his word over yours.
Link? I'd like to read the article.
Our O-line was underwhelming while run blocking last week against a far inferior ULM team. I haven't seen any problems in pass protection this year.
ETA. The O-line has only allowed 6 sacks through 3 games with 3 of those sacks coming in the first game.
This post was edited on 9/18/14 at 11:14 am
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:07 am to engie
quote:
That leaves 6 in the box and most likely 7 until proven it's the wrong move. When has Jennings has proven capable of beating someone with his arm
3 WRs with one safety over the top means state would have 7 in the box. You really think that's a smart play by a team that's giving up over 300 yards passing a game?
If state goes 2 safeties over the top that's 6 in the box. That's hat-for-hat numbers for LSU's running game. I'm sure they would take that all day.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News