Started By
Message
re: Last year Mizzou won East b/c GA, FL, & SC were hurt. What's excuse this year?
Posted on 11/2/14 at 8:07 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 11/2/14 at 8:07 pm to mizzoukills
We didn't get to play against driskel. shite wasn't fair.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 8:08 pm to LewDawg
Terron Harris played the entire second half, committed two turnovers, and the special teams gave up two scores for the Gators, not Driskel
Posted on 11/2/14 at 8:09 pm to randomways
It shouldn't matter if the East sucks or not. From day one we were told Mizzou couldn't compete regardless. Now all we see is pussy footing excuse making on why Mizzou can compete.
No Mizzou isn't an elite power and we never claimed to be. The problem is, there is too many knuckle dragging southern neanderthals stuck in the past and won't accept things as they are now.
No Mizzou isn't an elite power and we never claimed to be. The problem is, there is too many knuckle dragging southern neanderthals stuck in the past and won't accept things as they are now.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 8:12 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
You pulled the greatest sandbag in history by losing to Indiana.
It's not even the greatest SEC sanbag in the last calendar year.
Georgia Southern sez "Hey" from the Swamp...
Posted on 11/2/14 at 8:19 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Good teams don't lose to Indiana.
But they do lose to WVA, right?
LOL Baylor, you guys are so cute...
This post was edited on 11/2/14 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 11/2/14 at 8:26 pm to TrueMizzou
WVU is better than Indiana.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 8:41 pm to DaleDenton
17 straight though? 17.....
Posted on 11/2/14 at 8:56 pm to Mizzou4ever
quote:
It shouldn't matter if the East sucks or not. From day one we were told Mizzou couldn't compete regardless. Now all we see is pussy footing excuse making on why Mizzou can compete. No Mizzou isn't an elite power and we never claimed to be. The problem is, there is too many knuckle dragging southern neanderthals stuck in the past and won't accept things as they are now.
It hurts the narrative about how strong the SEC is when a middle of the road Big 12 team comes in and makes the title game in year 2 and possibly year 3. Nobody is supposed to be able to compete with the good ol boys.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:02 pm to randomways
quote:
The East just sucks this year. Again. Compare our records with those of the West and it'll be pretty obvious why Missouri is at an advantage in the division it drew. Only one team in the West is worse than 6-3.
Not directed at you Randomways....But all people said when Mizzou got picked to join the SEC is that Mizzou won't compete, can't compete, sucks, etc.
Funny how a team that sucks, lesser talent, plays in a high school stadium is doing better than a lot of SEC teams in the past 2yrs.
People laugh at Mizzou for losing to Indiana, what does that says about the teams that lose to Mizzou....hahahehe, Indiana knows how to beat Mizzou and those teams can't. Which in turns make people talk shite on the SEC because sorry arse Indiana can beat Mizzou but mighty SEC teams can't.
Mizzou have no business leading the SEC East since they suck, right???? SEC East teams should be dominating 2-3* avg Mizzou recruits. LOL@ those retarded recruiting rankings, not helping a lot of teams out huh.
And before we talk about SEC West teams....Mizzou beat TAMU and Ole Miss last season. I guess those teams were also down last year. Mizzou is competing in the SEC and it pisses people off because it debunks that myth that the whole damn conference is a powerhouse.
This post was edited on 11/2/14 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:04 pm to Chase Daniel
quote:
It hurts the narrative about how strong the SEC is when a middle of the road Big 12 team comes in and makes the title game in year 2 and possibly year 3. Nobody is supposed to be able to compete with the good ol boys.
And that's a reason why people like Bob Stoops talk shite on the SEC. Then they beat up on Bama in the Sugar Bowl. That's why I said if SEC folks laugh at Mizzou and talk shite on Mizzou for losing to Indiana, then all SEC teams better whip up on Mizzou or that shite will make you guys look like you suck too.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:06 pm to mizzoukills
Yall still have to win out first and also 34-0
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:09 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
Yall still have to win out first and also 34-0
It seems like Mizzou is playing A LOT better as the season goes on. That happens with a team that only returns 4 starters on offense. Strange huh. Sorta like LSU is getting better as the season progresses after losing all their talent.
Mizzou is getting hot at the right time of the year. How many other SEC teams lost as many starters on offense as Mizzou did??? And Mizzou is still competing in games with their 2* recruits, wow.
Hell wasn't Bud Sasser like 4th-5th on the WR depth chart last season. Now he's like the #1 wr this year. Yes that'll explain why Mizzou is struggling on offense.
This post was edited on 11/2/14 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:17 pm to mizzoukills
I think Mizzou loses to both Tennessee and Arky.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:17 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
Yall still have to win out first and also 34-0
We are playing with house money at this point. Not one frick was given about the loss to Georgia.
The reality is we do more with less and you all do less with more. I can see why you all are so fricking grouchy all the time.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:20 pm to mizzoukills
We are supposed to be competing with Vandy for bottom dweller of the SEC...according to everyone on this board in 2011
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:21 pm to kilo
quote:
The reality is we do more with less and you all do less with more. I can see why you all are so fricking grouchy all the time.
Mizzou would be scarey sick if they got the talent LSU, UGA, BAMA, Auburn, Ole Miss, Tenn, UF, SC, TAMU, etc did.
Now I wonder how those teams would do with Mizzou's avg recruiting talent.lol. We we already now how some of them are doing with Top classes.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:22 pm to bayou2003
quote:
bayou2003
This is the rant...you are required to hate tYankees and come up with excuses why we aren't dead last in the SEC...fall in line immediately!
This post was edited on 11/2/14 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:23 pm to bayou2003
So either the East sucks or the SEC isn't the powerhouse it's cracked up to be....
which is kind of the same thing.
Really don't see how Mizzou fans can argue they have a good team. It's a mediocre team in a terrible division with a bunch of hapless, washed up coaches.
The East has become an ACC division. Sad to watch, really. It was such a great division a few years back.
which is kind of the same thing.
Really don't see how Mizzou fans can argue they have a good team. It's a mediocre team in a terrible division with a bunch of hapless, washed up coaches.
The East has become an ACC division. Sad to watch, really. It was such a great division a few years back.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:24 pm to roadhouse
quote:
We are supposed to be competing with Vandy for bottom dweller of the SEC...according to everyone on this board in 2011
Come on now.....the excuse is because Mizzou got placed in the WEAKER division even though 4 of those teams easily out recruit Mizzou each season. First Mizzou won't compete in the SEC, now it's only because they play in the SEC East. I guess the SEC is not as dominant as people say. Now it's the SEC West except Arkansas and TAMU that are dominant.
Yes Ole Miss and Mississippi state are now SEC powerhouses after ONE good season.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News