Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:28 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Probably about as much as Miles winning percentage as LSU head coach at KF
I think *Chavis win percentage at Kyle Field is very relevant...
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:28 pm to Legendary0903
quote:
Just seemed like an underwhelming hire for LSU at the time.
Based on what? He took the defensive dregs at 'Bama and fashioned a top 30 defense in Saban's first year. Two superior defensive teams at Clemson with only one off year when the team lost most of their talent at one time. Not to mention he's been National recruiter of the year and an acclaimed position coach prior to being a coordinator. He flunked as a head coach at Baylor but so did a lot of folks prior to recent history. He's never been the coordinator of a group of athletes like he has now. He could flunk again and the dark side of the moon could be made of cheese. Neither is likely.
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:28 pm to NFLSU
quote:
Tell me which ranked SEC team A&M has beaten at Kyle Field since joining the SEC. Don't send another stupid fricking link to prove me right.
Itself.
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:29 pm to TeLeFaWx
Like I said, Helen Keller could coach LSU defenses to top 10 finishes
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:29 pm to NFLSU
quote:
Tell me which ranked SEC team A&M has beaten at Kyle Field since joining the SEC.
13 Vanderbilt.
quote:
Don't send another stupid fricking link to prove me right.
The same link that you supposedly said you weren't reading?
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:33 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
TeLeFaWx
So Fricking scared
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:34 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
IF the games were equal home and away we'd have a winning record for sure.
Maybe, it could be that for many of those years LSU just had a better team AND stadium.
From 1943-1986, when A&M was playing exclusively at LSU, LSU had the 17th ranked win rate nationwide at 64% while A&M languished at 79th with a 49% win rate.
It wasn't JUST that y'all played at Tiger Stadium it was also because y'all sucked. So chances are y'all would've sucked at home too. Would it have been better than it was? Probably. Would it have been a winning percent over LSU? Probably not.
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:36 pm to Korin
Vanderbilt was 4-3 (1-3 in the SEC) and unranked when they played Texas A&M on 10/26/2013.
Sticking up for Aggy is very sweet of you though!
Sticking up for Aggy is very sweet of you though!
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:38 pm to NFLSU
13 Vanderbilt was #24 in the AP and #23 in the Coaches.
Avoiding facts is very sweet of you though!
Avoiding facts is very sweet of you though!
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:39 pm to mattytiger123
yep. its all over. lsu is going to suck this year...even though we have an abundance of talent everywhere on defense. steele is coaching the 2015 lsu tiger defense...not baylor not clemson...LSU. big difference. lets line up and play frickin ball cant wait.
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:41 pm to Korin
quote:
13 Vanderbilt was #24 in the AP and #23 in the Coaches.
Not at game time.
He has a point.
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:44 pm to Korin
You spin just like an Aggy. You must be butthurt about LSU being the top destination for Florida DBs or something.
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:44 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Not at game time.
Guess he should've specified.
quote:
He has a point.
Or not, since eos rankings > gt rankings.
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:45 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Then he didn't have much of a point
Jesus do I have to spell it out for you?
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:45 pm to Legendary0903
quote:
Just seemed like an underwhelming hire for LSU at the time.
while I agree wholeheartedly with you, i'm going to reserve judgement. perception isn't reality with me.
my biggest concern is that he seems to be the opposite of chavis. chavis builds very small defenses and schemes to stop spread offenses (and is weak against power teams) while steele seems to be the opposite.
but what do I know?
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:46 pm to Korin
quote:
Or not, since eos rankings > gt rankings.
lol, no. Not when you're simply discussing whether or not a team was ranked. Is it semantics? maybe, but technically correct.
You should appreciate technicalities, Korin, you use them yourself enough.
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:47 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Jesus do I have to spell it out for you?
You do realize it would take multiple posts, don't you?
You gotta ask yourself, "is it worth it?"
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:47 pm to RANDY44
quote:
Based on what? He took the defensive dregs at 'Bama and fashioned a top 30 defense in Saban's first year. Two superior defensive teams at Clemson with only one off year when the team lost most of their talent at one time. Not to mention he's been National recruiter of the year and an acclaimed position coach prior to being a coordinator. He flunked as a head coach at Baylor but so did a lot of folks prior to recent history. He's never been the coordinator of a group of athletes like he has now. He could flunk again and the dark side of the moon could be made of cheese. Neither is likely.
People have yet to acknowledge the fact Steele had one of the best defenses in the nation in 09 and a very solid defense in 2010. 2011 was a result of a young, depleted defense (lack of talent).
Posted on 4/13/15 at 4:48 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
I started typing and reconsidered.
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News