Started By
Message
re: Joel Klatt’s Top 10 Teams Since 2000 Plus Hypothetical Four Team Playoff
Posted on 12/13/23 at 11:50 pm to dawgfan24348
Posted on 12/13/23 at 11:50 pm to dawgfan24348
Joel Klatt.
Trying to do shock jock sports but no one likes him. Not a winning strategy.
Trying to do shock jock sports but no one likes him. Not a winning strategy.
0
Posted on 12/13/23 at 11:51 pm to narddogg81
quote:
cause the defense was shite. It's not that hard
Not really
Posted on 12/13/23 at 11:57 pm to dawgfan24348
I actually like Klatt and I kinda respect his commitment to his anti-SEC shtick. But there is no way he actually believes the best SEC team since 2000 was the 4th best. Zero chance.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:02 am to Hot Carl
I have watched a lot of USFL in the spring the past couple of years and Klatt surprised me because he is pretty damn good as an analyst on the broadcast. I was actually shocked because I thought I would lose my mind watching him.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:06 am to RollingwiththeTide
That’s the thing, he’s talented and pretty fair in the moment. And at least
And at least makes good arguments for his takes, even though we may disagree, sometimes vehemently. But he’s being intellectually dishonest here.
And at least makes good arguments for his takes, even though we may disagree, sometimes vehemently. But he’s being intellectually dishonest here.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:11 am to Hot Carl
Well he lets his southern bias show every now and then because you can tell he doesn’t think much of the Stallions at times. All in all he does a pretty damn good job though.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:11 am to dawgfan24348
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:13 am to LSUDad
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:17 am to dawgfan24348
Posting anything from Klatt should be a bannable offense
Dude sucks
Dude sucks
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:18 am to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
I have watched a lot of USFL in the spring the past couple of years and Klatt surprised me because he is pretty damn good as an analyst on the broadcast. I was actually shocked because I thought I would lose my mind watching him.
That's because he's not being paid to shill absurd positions pertaining to the USFL
He is an unwatchable clown in CFB
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:28 am to OKBoomerSooner
I do not watch too much of him covering college football. I would rather watch a conference game instead of watching the Big Noon game on Fox. I could take Klatt though if I had too. The guy they have Klatt paired up with is the one that gets on my last nerve. He absolutely sucks. Everything is so overdone with him. Nails on a chalkboard sound soothing compared to that guy.
This post was edited on 12/14/23 at 12:44 am
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:42 am to labamafan
quote:
That LSU defense isn’t even top ten in LSU history.
Maybe not statistically but you can't compare what 2019 and other modern defenses are tasked with doing vs what defenses even just earlier in decade were asked to do. Tempo has taken over and defenses are having to defend more snaps per game. Plain and simple. Couple that with the fact that a high powered fast scoring offense is going to both cause your defense to be on the field more often and cause your opponent to try and keep up and you wind up giving up more yards and points than you used to when rbs were king in the conference. And that doesn't even mention rule changes like targeting that previous defenses didn't have to deal with.
So I'm not trying to say they had this unbelievable defense, I'm just saying it's not fair to compare them (or any defense) to those of the past. But even statistically that defense wasn't as bad on a national scale as some make it out to be.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 12:50 am to narddogg81
quote:
cause the defense was shite
In one Game. In 04/01/03 WR’s feared going over the middle because there would be headhunters ready to lay you out. Take away those with the additional targeting and adoption of spread, where are those USC/Miami teams?
Far below.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 3:59 am to dawgfan24348
Who cares? These greatest ever lists are silly. They were all great teams.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 4:30 am to TideSaint
quote:
USC would've smoked Auburn.
Auburn struggled to beat a mediocre Virginia Tech in their bowl game.
USC played Virginia Tech that year. They trailed at halftime, led by 1 score in the 4th quarter, and ultimately pulled away to win 24-13.
Not sure why this is the third time recently I've seen someone try to use 04 Auburn struggling with VT as some evidence USC would kill them when the difference in USC-VT and Auburn-VT was 8 points.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 4:44 am to narddogg81
quote:
But I don’t know how a team led by Burrow, Chase, and Jefferson isn’t in the top 2.
cause the defense was shite. It's not that hard
How did they do in the last 3 games when everyone was healthy vs 2 top 5 teams and another top 10 team?
Posted on 12/14/23 at 5:53 am to dawgfan24348
I like Klatt but I can’t take any list seriously that puts a team from before 2008 above a team from after 2017
01, 04 and 05 would lose easily to 18, 19, 20, 21 or 22. Especially if we’re playing with today’s ruleset
01, 04 and 05 would lose easily to 18, 19, 20, 21 or 22. Especially if we’re playing with today’s ruleset
Posted on 12/14/23 at 5:55 am to dawgfan24348
Mac Jones and Stetson Bennett in this group 
Posted on 12/14/23 at 6:12 am to BayouCowboy
quote:
at the time of the game
Posted on 12/14/23 at 6:22 am to HighTide_ATL
quote:It was hard to see in the moment but there was a definite change in the game. Bama and LSU in 2011 were two of the last great teams from the prior era. As great as those teams were, I don’t see much use in comparing them to LSU/Bama in 2019.
I like Klatt but I can’t take any list seriously that puts a team from before 2008 above a team from after 2017
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News