Started By
Message

re: Jamie Newburg ranks SEC RBs

Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:43 am to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43823 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Tre isn't a good example


He's actually the perfect example. More carries equals more yards. Therefore, more yards does not automatically equal more talent.

Gurley - 152 fewer carries
Gordon - 111 fewer carries
Hill - 114 fewer carries
White - 96 fewer carries
Hyde - 109 fewer carries
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25332 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:44 am to
If we were a 1 tailback system Jonathan Williams would be up there CLOSE to Chubb
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43823 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:44 am to
quote:

What are your criteria?


Like most people, I believe YPC and TDs per attempt are the best gauge.
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22678 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:48 am to
Then why didn't they get more carries? Tre's ability to carry that load has to count for something.
Posted by flyAU
Scottsdale
Member since Dec 2010
24849 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:49 am to
TBH YPC should be the only factor. TD's are situational where as YPC are specific to the play being based on the objective of what the RB job is, to get as many yards possible.
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22678 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:51 am to
Not really. CAP's ypc was higher than Tre's in 2013.
Posted by DaBama
Helena, AL
Member since Oct 2011
1630 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:52 am to
quote:

AU - 5 carries, 72 yds, 14.4/carry, 1 TD


quote:

You are such a little bitch. If you look at Derrick Henry's career, he is as likely to do nothing as he is to have a big game, especially when facing a decent defense. Only a moron like yourself would consider such a player to be a stud


Definition of nerve struck
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43823 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:55 am to
quote:

TBH YPC should be the only factor. TD's are situational where as YPC are specific to the play being based on the objective of what the RB job is, to get as many yards possible.


Incorrect. Points >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yards.


quote:

Then why didn't they get more carries? Tre's ability to carry that load has to count for something.


Ask the coaches. This doesn't change the fact that having more yards doesn't make you a better back.
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22678 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:56 am to
Point being is that we can talk about 2013, a season with established stats, and deciding who the best was is very subjective. Trying to come up with a list based on something that hasn't even happened is even more subjective. That's why I don't get caught up in these lists.
Posted by flyAU
Scottsdale
Member since Dec 2010
24849 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:58 am to
this is a futile discussion.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22531 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 10:58 am to
Just because someone has the most yards that does not make them the best RB. CAP was certainly not better than Chubb last year. Josh Robinson was probably also better than CAP last year.
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10568 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 11:00 am to


You love to fricking argue about the dumbest shite.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43823 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 11:01 am to
quote:

this is a futile discussion.


Well, you're arguing that a RBs objective is to get a many yards as possible, so it probably is.

You mean to tell me you'd rather have a RB that rushes for 1500 yards and 5 TDs over one that rushes for 500 yards and 15 TDs?
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22678 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 11:04 am to
How do you even choose based on that alone? This is jumping the shark now.
This post was edited on 6/8/15 at 11:06 am
Posted by auzach91
Marietta, GA
Member since Jan 2009
40254 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 11:06 am to
Lsu 2014 rushing attempts- 621
Auburn 2014 rushing attempts- 607
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43823 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 11:08 am to
quote:

How do you even choose based on that alone? This is jumping the shark now.


It's a simple question. Would you rather have a back that rushes for 1500 yards and 5 TDs, or one that rushes for 500 yards and 15 TDs?
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28286 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Lsu 2014 rushing attempts- 621
Auburn 2014 rushing attempts- 607


hmmmmmmmmmm
Posted by ATLdawg25
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 11:09 am to
quote:

That's why I don't get caught up in these lists.


I hate to tell you this buddy, but you already done been caught up
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22678 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 11:10 am to
I hate to tell you this, but I never even commented on this list.
Posted by SneakyWaff1es
Member since Nov 2012
3941 posts
Posted on 6/8/15 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Tre's ability to carry that load has to count for something.


His abilities were good enough to get drafted and carry the load until they drafted Todd Gurley. That should be enough for you Auburn rantards to see Tre isn't what you seem to think he is. He's talented and produced well for you but you don't take Gurley for your first pick in the draft when you plenty of other needs if Tre Mason is going to carry the load.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter