Started By
Message
It's the 5 year aniversary of the SEC expansion, what is your opinion?
Posted on 7/9/17 at 9:47 pm
Posted on 7/9/17 at 9:47 pm
Good move?
Living in Texas, I was glad to see Texas A&M join the SEC. They always seemed like a strong fit culturally. It also improved the college football conversations I could have with Aggies.
Mizzou did better than expected. Long term probably a good choice considering teams that were interested. Unfortunately for them they will forever be remembered for 24 / 7 ESPN news stories on Michael Sam and poop swastikas. Posters on here seemed to forget about jiz jars, Harvey Updike, butt funnels, etc. for about a year.
Living in Texas, I was glad to see Texas A&M join the SEC. They always seemed like a strong fit culturally. It also improved the college football conversations I could have with Aggies.
Mizzou did better than expected. Long term probably a good choice considering teams that were interested. Unfortunately for them they will forever be remembered for 24 / 7 ESPN news stories on Michael Sam and poop swastikas. Posters on here seemed to forget about jiz jars, Harvey Updike, butt funnels, etc. for about a year.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 9:48 pm to Ramblin Wreck
2012 Alabama would have been 14-0 if not for expansion.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 9:52 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
2012 Alabama would have been 14-0 if not for expansion
Watched that game with a bunch of Aggies. I was cheering for Bama and sat there in disbelief. On a positive side, it was a story book game for the Aggies. The surviving Junction Boys traveled to Tuscaloosa for the game as well as the full Aggie band. I think some of the Junction Boys were in poor health and passed away before the next season.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 9:53 pm to Ramblin Wreck
They've both been good additions.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 9:54 pm to Ramblin Wreck
quote:
Good move?
No
Wouldn't dumping all 4 expansion teams tbh
This post was edited on 7/9/17 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:00 pm to Ramblin Wreck
From the A&M perspective, it has been pretty much all positives. Better product, better competition, more exposure, more rev, improved culture, improved tailgating, and on and on. We should have done this in the early 90s.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:00 pm to Ramblin Wreck
aTm is an alright addition.
Missouri, not so much. Would trade them for an ACC team in a heartbeat.
Missouri, not so much. Would trade them for an ACC team in a heartbeat.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:04 pm to Ramblin Wreck
Should have stayed at 13 with TAMU knowing now how big of scmhucks Mizzou as a university and their fans are.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:12 pm to Ramblin Wreck
First there was Hitler who went in to Russia during the winter and then there was the SEC expanding to 14.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:15 pm to Ramblin Wreck
A&M was a logical choice in the West.Looking back
I think Maryland (yes Maryland) would've been the better choice in the East.
The DC/Baltimore/N Virginia TV market was a huge benefit for the new Big 10 TV deal and one of the reasons their per team revenues will be about $14 million hire per team than the SEC
I think Maryland (yes Maryland) would've been the better choice in the East.
The DC/Baltimore/N Virginia TV market was a huge benefit for the new Big 10 TV deal and one of the reasons their per team revenues will be about $14 million hire per team than the SEC
This post was edited on 7/9/17 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:18 pm to TideSaint
quote:
They've both been good additions.
I appreciate that. The back-to-back division titles were nice in the first 3 years of us being in the conference but let's be real, we were't brought in to boost football. Now that Kim Anderson is gone, we should be able to finally pull our weight in our main sport.
Mizzou Arena is ready
The Antlers are ready to heckle the opposing teams with vulgar and inappropriate remarks.
And after Jontay Porter reclassifies to play with his older brother, the most talented class in Mizzou basketball history is ready.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:25 pm to Ramblin Wreck
quote:
Mizzou did better than expected. Long term probably a good choice considering teams that were interested.
They were able to take advantage of a really weak east division, and won a couple games not many thought they could. Overall, they were a terrible addition. They fit better in the B1G, and the SEC should've gone after VA Tech or Clemson.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:29 pm to Ramblin Wreck
A&M is a good fit.
Missouri is just an odd fit all around.
Missouri is just an odd fit all around.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:42 pm to BayouBengals18
quote:
VA Tech or Clemson.
Clemson was never going to happen and they bring nothing in regards TV revenue/markets
Va Tech wouldn't have been a bad choice.
Mizzou wasn't a bad choice at the time in regards to
revenue and expansion into TV markets.Just a odd fit geographically
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:50 pm to RD Dawg
Having a bunch of Tech fans around would be hiiiilarious.
VT fans at bristol.
VT fans at bristol.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:51 pm to Ramblin Wreck
A&M was perfect. Still having trouble accepting Mizzou being a member. It's like a perfect cake recipe with 13 delicious ingredients and the somebody decided to take a shite in the batter.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:54 pm to Ramblin Wreck
Beat the snot out of Mizzou in our only matchup and Aggie has been an automatic win. So far, so good for LSU.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 10:58 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
TV revenue/markets
Means nothing to me. I'd rather the school be a good fit for the SEC, and Mizzou isn't that.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 11:12 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
Beat the snot out of Mizzou in our only matchup
Bull shite. I was at the '78 Liberty Bowl when Mizzou beat the snot out of lsu. The record is now 1-1.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News