Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:53 pm to secfan123
quote:
secfan123
You're fighting a losing battle.
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:53 pm to secfan123
quote:
NFL numbers doesnt compare to on field performance.
jesus fricking christ
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:54 pm to secfan123
quote:
Does it really matter how much nfl talent a school has if they dont perform on the field?
are you even paying attention to the teams they played in those respective years? Can you at least agree that the 2008 SEC >> 2003 SEC? That really isn't even debatable.
quote:
ASk yourself why you would hire a guy who couldnt beat the guy you just fired?
I would like for you to explain to me why Les Miles at LSU is great but we beat him at while at Oklahoma State? Hell.....I won't even address that question to only you.
Can anyone here in the class explain Les Miles' success at LSU when Ole Miss beat him in 2003 while at Oklahoma State?
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:54 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
make decisions like Nutt will have to about Snoop
What? There's a chance he wont play wr? That, sir, would suck arse.
He was a better DB at USP.
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:56 pm to Flatt2Flowers04
quote:
Your talking out of your arse. The 08' team was the most talented Ole Miss squad I have seen in my lifetime and may ever see.
Eli carried the 03 team the entire year.
2010 alabama was more talented than 2008 Alabama. Who was the better team?
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:57 pm to pankReb
quote:
He was a better DB at USP.
Maybe so, but i bet you want to see him at receiver. i know i would. Seems to be too athletic to put on D.
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:57 pm to Slippery Slope
quote:
You're fighting a losing battle.
He's refusing to recognize how good the teams were in those respective years.
Look at Bama in 2003 and 2008. It's no contest. 2008 Ole Miss would have destroyed 2003 Bama. And I'd say a Saban-led 2008 Bama would have beaten Eli.
That alone would have switched records.
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:58 pm to secfan123
2010 Bama had a much tougher schedule. Only one team in the West in 2008 had four or more wins in conference.
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:58 pm to secfan123
quote:
2010 alabama was more talented than 2008 Alabama. Who was the better team?
Who beat that 2010 squad? And how good were those teams in 2010 vs 2008?
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:59 pm to NIH
quote:
2010 Bama had a much tougher schedule. Only one team in the West in 2008 had four or more wins in conference.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
and now we have the facts that dipshit doesn't take into consideration.
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:59 pm to rebeltider
he'd be a scary hire for the rest of the west
crazy and would probably self destruct sooner or later - but he would do some damage in the meantime
crazy and would probably self destruct sooner or later - but he would do some damage in the meantime
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:59 pm to secfan123
Posted on 7/19/11 at 3:59 pm to pankReb
quote:
Can you at least agree that the 2008 SEC >> 2003 SEC?
2003 SEC
LSU #1
Georgia#6
Ole Miss #13
Tennessee #15
Florid Gators #24
2008 SEC
Florida #1
Alabama #6
Georgia #13
Ole Miss#20
Posted on 7/19/11 at 4:00 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
Maybe so, but i bet you want to see him at receiver. i know i would. Seems to be too athletic to put on D.
I want to see him at WR....but I want what's best for our team. We have some dynamic WR's that came in with him and we're thin at DB.
Posted on 7/19/11 at 4:03 pm to rebeltider
I wanted Leach last year if we lost Mullen. He did what he did in Lubboch and he never left. So he could do it again in Starkville or Oxford and might stay for a long time.
This post was edited on 7/19/11 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 7/19/11 at 4:04 pm to rebeltider
Here is a breakdown of his recruiting from the 2002 class to the 2009 class:
Class breakdown by stars:
2002 - 2 ****, 9 ***, 12 **, 1 *
2003 - 2 ****, 11 ***, 12 **
2004 - 1 *****, 4 ****, 6 ***, 14 **
2005 - 1 ****, 12 ***, 8 **
2006 - 4 ****, 22 ***, 8 **
2007 - 1 ****, 17 ***, 8 **
2008 - 3 ****, 10 ***, 3 **
2009 - 5 ****, 15 ***, 5 **
Star Average:
2002 - 2.50
2003 - 2.60
2004 - 2.68
2005 - 2.67
2006 - 2.88
2007 - 2.73
2008 - 3.00
2009 - 3.00
Class rankings (Rivals):
2002 - #48
2003 - #44
2004 - #33
2005 - #37
2006 - #25
2007 - cannot find, higher than class #50 though
2008 - #45
2009 - #33
In-state player percentage:
2002 - 75%
2003 - 56%
2004 - 68%
2005 - 86%
2006 - 82%
2007 - 58%
2008 - 63%
2009 - 84%
He could recruit better players at Ole Miss, no doubt.
Class breakdown by stars:
2002 - 2 ****, 9 ***, 12 **, 1 *
2003 - 2 ****, 11 ***, 12 **
2004 - 1 *****, 4 ****, 6 ***, 14 **
2005 - 1 ****, 12 ***, 8 **
2006 - 4 ****, 22 ***, 8 **
2007 - 1 ****, 17 ***, 8 **
2008 - 3 ****, 10 ***, 3 **
2009 - 5 ****, 15 ***, 5 **
Star Average:
2002 - 2.50
2003 - 2.60
2004 - 2.68
2005 - 2.67
2006 - 2.88
2007 - 2.73
2008 - 3.00
2009 - 3.00
Class rankings (Rivals):
2002 - #48
2003 - #44
2004 - #33
2005 - #37
2006 - #25
2007 - cannot find, higher than class #50 though
2008 - #45
2009 - #33
In-state player percentage:
2002 - 75%
2003 - 56%
2004 - 68%
2005 - 86%
2006 - 82%
2007 - 58%
2008 - 63%
2009 - 84%
He could recruit better players at Ole Miss, no doubt.
Posted on 7/19/11 at 4:04 pm to rebeltider
quote:
what would the Ole Miss fanbase think if Pete Boone went out and hired Mike Leach
Leach isn't "frat" enought for Ole Miss. He would stick out more than O. A good coach he is, a fit at Ole Miss he ain't
Posted on 7/19/11 at 4:04 pm to secfan123
quote:
2003 SEC
LSU #1
Georgia#6
Ole Miss #13
Tennessee #15
Florid Gators #24
We didn't play those two teams.
quote:
2008 SEC
Florida #1
Alabama #6
Georgia #13
Ole Miss#20
We didn't play this team.
Posted on 7/19/11 at 4:05 pm to chilld28
quote:
I just heard you on Finebaum
Wasn't me, twas my roommate
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News