Started By
Message
If allegations against Michigan prove to be true, should they receive a playoff ban?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 7:01 pm
Posted on 10/19/23 at 7:01 pm
And Harbaugh be forced out?
18
Posted on 10/19/23 at 7:05 pm to sandman1
No
Posted on 10/19/23 at 7:07 pm to sandman1
Playoff ban - yes
Harbaugh forced out - no, but suspended to start next season again.
Harbaugh forced out - no, but suspended to start next season again.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 7:15 pm to sandman1
100%. If ole Miss did this we would receive a ban.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 7:28 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
Playoff ban - yes
Harbaugh forced out - no, but suspended to start next season again.
This seems about right.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 7:31 pm to sandman1
No. If someone is dumb enough to get their signals stolen then they deserve it. It's no different than knowing what plays teams run when lined up a certain way. They can still change it last second before it can be relayed to the team.
Plus most plays have options that can't be known by the signal or zones on defense.
Plus most plays have options that can't be known by the signal or zones on defense.
This post was edited on 10/19/23 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:20 pm to Rabern57
Go figure a Barn rat would be ok with it after trying to sign steal their way to a Natty.
Kelvin and crablegs deservedly put them in the dirt after it was found out.
Kelvin and crablegs deservedly put them in the dirt after it was found out.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:21 pm to sandman1
Nah, the SEC needs a cupcake in the playoffs.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:23 pm to Big Steev
“…staring down the barrel of the death penalty.”
Where did I hear that?
Where did I hear that?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:26 pm to Rabern57
quote:
No. If someone is dumb enough to get their signals stolen then they deserve it. It's no different than knowing what plays teams run when lined up a certain way
Actually, most people consider it completely different. Look at what happened with the Patriots and what happened with the Astros.
But you always have a bad take.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:29 pm to Rabern57
quote:
No. If someone is dumb enough to get their signals stolen then they deserve it. It's no different than knowing what plays teams run when lined up a certain way. They can still change it last second before it can be relayed to the team.
Plus most plays have options that can't be known by the signal or zones on defense.
This.
Since when is stealing signals illegal? Doesn't every team do this?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:36 pm to HailToTheChiz
Another Auburn fan. Go figure.
How blatant did it have to be to get the neutered NCAA to launch an investigation into it mid season?
quote:
If true, the Wolverines would have violated NCAA Bylaw 11.6.1, which states: "Off-campus, in-person scouting of future opponents (in the same season) is prohibited.
How blatant did it have to be to get the neutered NCAA to launch an investigation into it mid season?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:37 pm to sandman1
I was thinking the same thing. How can a cheat by in the playoffs?
Posted on 10/20/23 at 12:50 am to captdalton
quote:
Off-campus, in-person scouting of future opponents (in the same season) is prohibited.
wtf is this a rule? seems like good preparation to me.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 1:46 am to sandman1
I don't know if it's common practice and everyone is doing it, but it sounds bad for sure. Post-season ban seems reasonable but I'd like to mud stomp them again in the playoffs, too.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 3:09 am to Rabern57
But sign stealing during the game is not the only allegation. If during the game you figure out signals, that's not illegal.
They are claiming that Harbough has people go to opponent games and watch their sidelines to steal the signals in advance. Sending scouts to an opponent's game (or practice) for the sole intent of signal stealing is in fact illegal by NCAA rules.
This is why you now see every team holding up big blinders and shite during games.
You would think by now that teams would have figured out how to make signals random enough so they can't be stolen.
They are claiming that Harbough has people go to opponent games and watch their sidelines to steal the signals in advance. Sending scouts to an opponent's game (or practice) for the sole intent of signal stealing is in fact illegal by NCAA rules.
This is why you now see every team holding up big blinders and shite during games.
You would think by now that teams would have figured out how to make signals random enough so they can't be stolen.
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 3:12 am
Posted on 10/20/23 at 6:20 am to sandman1
No - it’s too enjoyable to see them get trashed in the playoffs
Posted on 10/20/23 at 6:39 am to sandman1
Incoming Mizzou postseason ban.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 6:43 am to sandman1
No.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 7:58 am to tgerb8
quote:
quote:
Off-campus, in-person scouting of future opponents (in the same season) is prohibited.
wtf is this a rule? seems like good preparation to me.
I think it is because some schools can afford to hire people to scout their future opponents while other schools can't. It's purpose is to level the playing field.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News