Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/15/12 at 3:05 pm to harmonics
quote:
Which was fricking stupid. It's the god damn BCS title. Your opponent is great regardless of the personnel. Score 60 if you can.
McElroy had cracked ribs. They had to rely on the run game.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 3:38 pm to PrivatePublic
Notre Dame has one guy with a lot of tackles, then the next leading tacklers are way back and they are DBs. That says something, actually says a lot. DBs
You better go back and resort your frickin' Holy Cards shithead.
You better go back and resort your frickin' Holy Cards shithead.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:06 pm to BuccWildBammer
quote:
If you have watched ANY ND (seriously doubt you have judging from comparisons) Golson isa LOT slower runner than Manziel & lacks the vision even as a runner, but ESPECIALLY as a passer, he can scramble, but throwing on the run almost always results in him throwing a pick or fumbling, it's why he was BENCHED against Michigan, who ALMOST BEAT ND. That's right, the same Michigan team that Bama beat by TWENTY SEVEN! But we haven't played anybody RIIIIIIIGHT
Are you denying that Michigan sux? Before the SECCG Bama had played two good teams. Lost one and won the other on the last possession. ITs a fair statement to say Bama hasn't played a tough schedule. It doesn't mean your team sucks
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:09 pm to Rickdaddy4188
I agree.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:09 pm to DollaChoppa
Baylor wouldve destroyed them last year. Not to mention this years west virginia.
West Virginia & Baylor .. REALLY.
Smoking too much crack is bad for the brain...
West Virginia & Baylor .. REALLY.
Smoking too much crack is bad for the brain...
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:11 pm to snake1
That was an obvious troll. Funny not a single Bama fan bit on it, but you did.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:25 pm to BuccWildBammer
quote:
And btw Bama would've gotten in whether we beat Texas or not, OSU lost to IOWA STATE, that's like us going undefeated then the week before the SECCG losing to Vanderbilt
This is ignorant. Never , in the history of the BCSCG , has who you lost to COUNTED MORE than who you beat. Not once. Except last year.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:27 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Man, I should get the OP to show me his tackle box.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:28 pm to PrivatePublic
You're an outstanding poster Private Pubic. Keep up the good work man. They're gonna write poetry and songs about you one day man.....
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:28 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Bama exposed
I thought this thread was about something else.
*looks around nervously for ballsack
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:30 pm to genro
quote:
Well we don't know about next year. And an "easy" SEC schedule >>>>>>> than a B1G/Pac-12/Big 12/ACC schedule. Plus we have decent OOC and potential SECCG.
I agree. The easiest SEC schedule is still harder than the hardest Acc & big ten schedules.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:40 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
McCarron played shitty vs LSU until the last drive, LSU only scored 12 vs Auburn. Nothing is 100% consistent.
What it does show is that a mediocre def( mich) can shut down ND's rushing attack. I wasn't using transitive prop. Also, yes AJ didn't play his best game, but Mich def isn't any where near LSU's def. So saying that AJ struggling against LSU=mich shutting down ND's offense , is absurd. Bama didn't struggle offensively this year except against LSU and the first half of A&M. ND struggled more than a few times this year, even against mediocre defenses.im not saying ND struggling against Mich means they will struggle against Bama. All it says is that ND's offense has the ability to struggle against shite defenses
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
ND has better offensive stats passing and rushing than LSU this year, and LSU ran up and down the field vs Bama. ND is no slouch.
This is dumb. They do not have a 6'4 qb with a rocket arm. Again BAMA's weakness is secondary. A weakness ND can't exploit.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 4:48 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Yes Rick, Our secondary is definitely our weakness and i bet ND is working on their down field passing game a lot. I know passing isn't their strong suit but i bet they try us a good bit.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 7:24 pm to bamagreycoat
[quote]Yes Rick, Our secondary is definitely our weakness and i bet ND is working on their down field passing game a lot. I know passing isn't their strong suit but i bet they try us a good bit. [/quot
I'm sure they'll try, but ND likes to run the ball.
Also , ND's weakness on defense , is also their secondary , but they don't have a D Milliner or a Lester. Bama can exploit ND's secondary.
I'm sure they'll try, but ND likes to run the ball.
Also , ND's weakness on defense , is also their secondary , but they don't have a D Milliner or a Lester. Bama can exploit ND's secondary.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 7:51 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
ND's weakness on defense , is also their secondary , but they don't have a D Milliner or a Lester. Bama can exploit ND's secondary.
I think I read early in the season that some of their DB's were converted WRs. If that's the case I feel good about Bama's chances provided AJ brings his "A" game.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 9:37 pm to Tigerbait357
No one is exposing anything... please you may get arrested. Now onto football, Notre Dame will lose. I have spoken.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 11:06 pm to PrivatePublic
Crybabies gone wild. Maybe Huggie Badger would been more appropriate.
Posted on 12/15/12 at 11:08 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
ND has better offensive stats passing and rushing than LSU this year, and LSU ran up and down the field vs Bama. ND is no slouch.
quote:
This is dumb.
What's dumb? That ND has a better offense than LSU?
quote:
They do not have a 6'4 qb with a rocket arm. Again BAMA's weakness is secondary. A weakness ND can't exploit.
Neither does A&M
Page 7 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News