Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:03 pm to WG_Dawg
I got your gist and I thought it was perfect. Y'all used to catch all the hell during the Urban years and now it is UT. 
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:06 pm to bigDgator
quote:
I got your gist and I thought it was perfect. Y'all used to catch all the hell during the Urban years and now it is UT
absolutely, that was the entire point I was getting at.
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:08 pm to GetCocky11
If you are impressed by that you should check out the Bama dominance over LSU. Bama owns that arse. It's embarrassing how we have owned that arse.
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:14 pm to WG_Dawg
Our resident henchman are on a mission today. Best stay out of their way.
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:40 pm to GetCocky11
It's like saying you had no idea the series between OM and Bama was so lopsided because of the last two years. It's about more than straight-up h-to-h.
Also: let's face it, comparing an era that includes the best period in UF's history (by far) with an era that includes the worst period in UT's is hardly fair. I take no joy in defending UT, but I think intellectual honesty is the way to go here.
Edit: no joy. NO joy. Dammit. Now Kim Jong Un is going to execute me with anti-tank guns for crimes against humanity.
Also: let's face it, comparing an era that includes the best period in UF's history (by far) with an era that includes the worst period in UT's is hardly fair. I take no joy in defending UT, but I think intellectual honesty is the way to go here.
Edit: no joy. NO joy. Dammit. Now Kim Jong Un is going to execute me with anti-tank guns for crimes against humanity.
This post was edited on 9/1/16 at 5:46 pm
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:45 pm to randomways
quote:
It's like saying you had no idea the series between OM and Bama was so lopsided because of the last two years. It's about more than straight-up h-to-h.
Appreciate that but it's not as lopsided as that stat. We only played 21 times prior to 1992. We had the series lead until the current streak.
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:50 pm to Under_Oath
Tennessee couldn't beat them with Payton Manning
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:51 pm to Prof
quote:
Appreciate that but it's not as lopsided as that stat. We only played 21 times prior to 1992. We had the series lead until the current streak.
My point, which I somehow forgot to segue to, was that taking the number and ignoring the context is misguided. I think UF is still the winningest team in the SEC since 1990 (I'm not going to look up if they still are, but if not, they're pretty damned close.) UT still won a BCSNC and went through the roughest period in its history while UF was peaking (people can argue when the peaking happened, but Urban winning two titles in less than half the time it took Spurrier to win one sounds like peaking to me.)
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:51 pm to WG_Dawg
So, if UT wins this year, does it erase all those other years?
Posted on 9/1/16 at 5:58 pm to HolographicCharizard
quote:Which should be the fate of all monkeys.
Gotta get that monkey off our back, then beat it to death, then bury it in a lead container dozens of feet underground.
Nasty little bastards.
Posted on 9/1/16 at 6:00 pm to bigDgator
UT was good for a decade and a half after segregation. They're like an Oregon or Boise in my book.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:24 pm to bigDgator
quote:
20-6 UGa
20-6 UT
26-0 Ky
20-6 and 26-0 are impossible, because the divisions have only existed for 24 years. Here's UF's actual record against permanent opponents since the divisions were created:
2-2 (.500).......Missouri
14-10 (.583)...LSU
18-6 (.750).....Georgia
19-5 (.792).....South Carolina/Tennessee
23-1 (.958).....Vanderbilt
24-0 (1.000)....Kentucky
Looks like Mizzou is the only permanent opponent that owns UF since the creation of the SEC East.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News