Started By
Message
re: How many active members from other conferences do we have here?
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:32 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:32 pm to SummerOfGeorge
so you trust FPI. seeing as OU and Baylor are #1 and #2 in FPI I will accept your analysis.
1
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:35 pm to BearBait09
quote:
so you trust FPI. seeing as OU and Baylor are #1 and #2 in FPI I will accept your analysis.
We can use Sagarin if you wish? Or Massey. Or basically any other computer analysis.
All have Alabama in the top 3. All say Alabama has played a Top 10 schedule.
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:40 pm to SummerOfGeorge
it was never my point that Alabama has played an easy schedule. Alabama has, however, played an easier schedule than the numbers would imply. They have done this because their schedule is loaded with two types of teams, teams with power run centric offenses, and teams with inferior talent. the one team that does not fit either of these categories beat Alabama in Tuscaloosa.
I believe Alabama would lose two games with Stanford's schedule because Stanford's schedule includes are more challenging variety of schematics.
I believe Alabama would lose two games with Stanford's schedule because Stanford's schedule includes are more challenging variety of schematics.
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:44 pm to BearBait09
quote:
teams with power run centric offenses
Alabama has played 4 teams that are power run centric - Wisconsin, Georgia, Arkansas and LSU.
Alabama has/will play 4 teams that are run spread oriented - Tennessee, Auburn, Charleston Southern, ULM
Alabama has played 4 teams are pass spread oriented - MTSU, Ole Miss, Texas A&M, Mississippi State
Florida will probably be #13 and they are more power run centric but are much more West Coast concept than power I.
quote:
and teams with inferior talent.
So Alabama is penalized for having a lot of talent? What other schedule could they play that has an equal amount of talent? 12 games against Ohio State?
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 5:46 pm
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:48 pm to BearBait09
quote:
I believe Alabama would lose two games with Stanford's schedule because Stanford's schedule includes are more challenging variety of schematics.
Are you serious?
The reason Alabama lost to Ole Miss is because they committed 5 turnovers. Very few teams will win a game against anyone with a -4 turnover margin.
And speaking of Stanford's schedule:
Northwestern: Alabama destroyed Wisconsin, who is about on par with Northwestern. - WIN
UCF: The worst team in college football - WIN
@ USC - WIN
@ Oregon State - WIN
vs. Arizona - WIN
vs. UCLA - WIN
vs. Washington - WIN
@ Washington State - Shutout WIN
@ Colorado - WIN
vs. Oregon - WIN
vs. Cal - WIN
vs. Notre Dame - WIN
There is a massive talent disparity between Alabama and every team on Stanford's schedule.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:49 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
So Alabama is penalized for having a lot of talent? What other schedule could they play that has an equal amount of talent? 12 games against Ohio State?
Seriously, he can't admit that Bama's good can he? He's saying that he knows there are multiple teams better than Bama like he knows that for a fact.
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:54 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
CGSC Lobotomy
See now, people say A&M is a bad fit for the SEC but posts like this make me think you are perfect. Look at how deep you've gone on that Bama pole. Please tell me of more wins Bama has against teams it hasn't played.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:57 pm to BearBait09
quote:
Please tell me of more wins Bama has against teams it hasn't played.
quote:
Alabama would have two losses with Stanford's schedule.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 5:57 pm to BearBait09
Well, we've seen how well Baylor plays against teams that don't shite themselves when they get down 1 score.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News