Started By
Message
re: How fricking weird is it that Muschamp is the DC at Auburn?
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:44 pm to 14&Counting
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:44 pm to 14&Counting
quote:You are clearly incapable of having a normal conversation without the gump coming out in you.
14&Counting
1
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:45 pm to 14&Counting
You're not wrong - red zone efficiency was not up to snuff last year, and (as shown earlier in the thread) was attributed to poor OL play. Luckily, we're getting our 2013 OG back with Kozan, which should help to shore up execution problems in the red zone.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:55 pm to ChexMix
I'm having a normal conversation with you...tell me how i am wrong?
It would be nice to have a football conversation with AU fans that doesn't involve trolling and flaming...
It would be nice to have a football conversation with AU fans that doesn't involve trolling and flaming...
Posted on 6/6/15 at 7:24 pm to 14&Counting
quote:there were a combined 99 points scored. If you pick four drives randomly, the chances of them being scoring drives is high. How were you not able to draw that conclusion? Ignorance perhaps?
Last years Iron Bowl? I honestly don't see how you draw that conclusion
quote:excuses/flaming
.eight of ya'lls points were pure garbage time that mattered not a whit to the outcome of that game
quote:very true. Auburn should have scored 40 by half time but didnt. None the less, those drives were still scoring drives.
Your red zone efficency was pretty terrible and got a lot of your yards by Duke and Coats working our DB's.....chewed up a lot of yards against Bama but not as much to show for it as you should have...when the field got compressed the Gus Bus stalled more than a couple of times.
quote:Auburn lost by 11. Two touchdown scoring stops would have won the game. Its simple math
i am not sure that two more defensive stops would have got AU the win last year considering we racked 55 points with three turnovers.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 8:22 pm to Roses of Crimson
quote:
AU's defenses WILL NOT be the old Tuberville defenses. You might hold teams to 24 points a game but not the averages they had under ball control Tuberville.
I am afraid these type of defenses are a thing of the past for any college football team. It is a offense driven league now
Posted on 6/6/15 at 8:59 pm to harmonics
quote:
I feel bad for Muschamp. Auburn fans think he is going to come in and immediately field the best defense in the SEC. They will probably be slightly better than last year, which isn't saying much. He was ultimately hired to stop Alabama, a team which has crushed his defenses the last 3 meetings.
I mean, Obama should do something for these people. Look at how fricking stupid they are.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 9:13 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
I mean, I was not against him at Florida per se. He inherited a pretty bad situation there
Seriously, really? He inherited a fricking Urban Meyer team but didn't know how to use it. Florida was one of the most talented programs in the country. You couldn't be more wrong, IMO.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 9:28 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Seriously, really? He inherited a fricking Urban Meyer team but didn't know how to use it. Florida was one of the most talented programs in the country. You couldn't be more wrong, IMO.
Urban left UF for a reason. The Program was hanging on by a thread due to some of Meyers management. Part of Muschamp's problems the last two years were because of Meyers recruiting and discipline issues.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 9:32 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Part of Muschamp's problems the last two years were because of Meyers recruiting and discipline issues.
Discipline issues granted. Recruiting issues will need elaboration. I mean, Urban's last Florida class was ranked #1 by 247 and he never recruited a class NOT ranked in the Top 10.
The only argument I could entertain is that Urban neglected specific positions, like the offensive line. The retort, of course, is that Urban recruited the line that HE wanted and Muschamp didn't know how to use it. It clearly worked for Urban.
Anyways, I call BS on the recruiting thing. Talent was NOT the issue at Florida. Will Muschamp did not know how to use the talent he had. Plain and simple.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 9:32 pm to Irons Puppet
Our total offense under Muschamp:
2011: #105
2012: #104
2013: #116
2014: #96
You can't blame Meyer for that.
2011: #105
2012: #104
2013: #116
2014: #96
You can't blame Meyer for that.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 9:34 pm to ChexMix
LOL - you really think those 8 points in the waning miutes mattered? Auburn had lost the game before you even scored....that game was over,,,,you got domintaed and locked down in the 4th quarter....shitload of yards but weak arse red zone team....I mean we milk the clock on your last drive you guys get your score, went for two and burned more time, Bama gets the ball back and takes a knee....garbage time points that meant absoloutely nothing.....
whats incredible is that we turn the ball over three times and we still get 55 points. You should be thankful becuase that game could have got out of hand and really ugly for AU. By your logic the differential could have just as easily gone Bama's way. Kiffin to me is as good if not better offesnive coach than Malzhan.
whats incredible is that we turn the ball over three times and we still get 55 points. You should be thankful becuase that game could have got out of hand and really ugly for AU. By your logic the differential could have just as easily gone Bama's way. Kiffin to me is as good if not better offesnive coach than Malzhan.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 9:35 pm to Korin
quote:
Muschamp
Just doesn't know offense. Where Muschamp had actual expertise (i.e., defense), his Florida teams excelled. Where he had none, they were, well ... I don't have to tell you.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 9:37 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
Kiffin to me is as good if not better offesnive coach than Malzhan.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 9:49 pm to Korin
I don't why your laughing....Sims turned over three times and we still dominated UF and hung 42 on your coach and Auburn's future savior.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 9:56 pm to 14&Counting
quote:our conversation was about how having two additional defensive stops could have a 0-28 point swing in a game. Not your dumb arse attempt at flaming. Why i try to talk to fricking dumb arse gumps like yourself is beyond me. Do the world a favor and get sterilized
14&Counting
Posted on 6/6/15 at 10:01 pm to ChexMix
Your the one who brought the Iron Bowl into this discussion postulating that two more defensive stops would have changed the outcome of that game and I am simply pointing out you fallacy of your argument.
Sorry to blow up the AU party line on the moral victory.
Sorry to blow up the AU party line on the moral victory.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 10:10 pm to 14&Counting
quote:No you havent. You have been incapable of even grasping what the frick we are talking about.
I am simply pointing out you fallacy of your argument.
I will make it kinder-garden level for you.
Alabama scores two TDs on consecutive drives. Thats 14 points. With me so far?
Instead of scoring, Alabama has to punt instead, thats 14 points not on the board anymore. Mind blowing I know, but try to keep up.
After punting both times, Auburn scores a TDs. Thats 14 points. Holy shite, a 28 point difference that CHANGES the outcome of a game.
Did ya follow that, or do you need me to draw you a diagram in crayon you fricking chode
Posted on 6/6/15 at 10:20 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
I don't why your laughing....Sims turned over three times and we still dominated UF and hung 42 on your coach and Auburn's future savior.
Missouri had 120 yards of offense and also scored 42. So yeah, thanks for helping me make my point.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 10:43 pm to Korin
im sorry but this the same defensive guru Florida just fired that gave up 120 yards of offense and yet 42 points to Mizzou? Is this the same one we are certain is good for 28 points a game and four more wins on Auburn's schedule?
I should actually be thanking you for helping to demonstrate why that prediction is so laughable.
I should actually be thanking you for helping to demonstrate why that prediction is so laughable.
This post was edited on 6/6/15 at 10:45 pm
Posted on 6/6/15 at 10:55 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
im sorry but this the same defensive guru Florida just fired that gave up 120 yards of offense and yet 42 points to Mizzou? Is this the same one we are certain is good for 28 points a game and four more wins on Auburn's schedule?
I should actually be thanking you for helping to demonstrate why that prediction is so laughable.
I thought we were talking about the defensive guru that gave up 630 yards and 44 points to an 8-5 AU time. You know the guy who will be bama's next HC.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News