Started By
Message

How can they fix the bowls?

Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:28 am
Posted by Allthatfades
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2014
6737 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:28 am
Or are they dead? Can only imagine it will get worse with the 12 team playoff next year. The playoff will be fine and draw huge numbers in person and on tv but there’s no way people are going to continue to travel, spend money on hotels, etc. to watch second and third stringers in a glorified scrimmage. I don’t think there is any way the bowls can continue in the direction they are headed.
Posted by RelentlessTide
Member since Feb 2020
2943 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:39 am to
That’s it. It’s become a scrimmage. Bowls should be played in preparation for next year. Maybe even move them to the end of spring practice.

Only players for the following season should be involved.
Posted by Kenny Stapler
Member since Dec 2023
174 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:42 am to
Pay the players a bonus to play in them? Maybe even a performance bonus?

Just throwing that out there. Don’t shoot me.
Posted by TubaDawg
Member since Mar 2014
163 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:42 am to
I don't think there is a way to fix it. However, I would move the minimum number of wins to 8 and cut the number of bowls from 43 to 25. This wouldn't fix opt outs, but you would hopefully get better match ups.

The other option is within a NIL contract putting a stipulation that the player barring injury must complete the season, including post season games.
Posted by UnsureTiger
Member since Apr 2023
50 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:45 am to
There's only one way to fix them and that is money.

Maybe if the bowl sponsors signed an nil deal with all participating players then that would entice more to play. It likely wouldn't be enough money for top NFL draft picks to take that chance though so there's not much anyone can do about it.
Posted by RelentlessTide
Member since Feb 2020
2943 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:48 am to
How many teams were significantly affected by opt outs. All I can thing of are FSU and A&M. Otherwise, it’s been a good bowl season.
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13165 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:51 am to
The bowls should be part of the playoffs.
For instance, if Georgia/FSU had been playing in a semi-final game as part of the 12 team players, then I'm pretty sure FSU would have had fewer players opting out.
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
5016 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:54 am to
There are way too many bowls as we all know. The majority of them need to go away as they serve no purpose and most of the time there are more than enough empty seats.

The NY6 Bowls don’t even make sense going forward as you can win two in the same Playoff. I just say get rid of the NY6 altogether but still have those NY6 stadiums as the permanent sites that rotate each year in the quarters and semis.

I still think the NY6 should be involved if the bowls were to stay. The quarterfinals can rotate between the six NY6 cities without being called the actual bowl game. Once the semifinals occur, those can be the two named NY6 bowls like we have now. In the same bowl season, have the other NY6 games played on a different day, preferably a week apart.

Overall, eliminate the majority of the bowls and keep just a few in which programs that just missed out on the CFP can still, hopefully, play competitive and meaningful games.

2024 Postseason (CFP)
- First Round (campus site)
- Quarters (NY6 Site, not the Bowl)
- Semifinals (Rose and Sugar)
- CFPNCG

Non-CFP
- Fiesta, Cotton, Peach, Orange

Remove the other bowls. They serve no purpose.

Have the four non-CFP bowls played the weekend prior. The following weekend, start the CFP.

Posted by justjoe906
Member since Oct 2013
1371 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:02 am to
Too late now, opt-outs, portal and NIL has ruined college football.
Posted by stang14
Member since Nov 2019
969 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:12 am to
Bowls with group of 5 teams are the only ones worth watching.
Posted by Dawgs9
Where ever I am
Member since Sep 2012
1943 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:14 am to
The bowl games will be the playoffs
Posted by MizzouTrue
Member since Jun 2016
3841 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:16 am to
I feel teams that aren’t top 12, are going to play more starters since their starters are less likely to be drafted

Mizzou had a solid team but even if we were playing in the Gator Bowl, I’m almost sure we’d be able to field the same roster we had for the Cotton Bowl. Our best players are either too young (Burden) or not highly regarded enough by NFL scouts (Schrader) to warrant sitting out a bowl game

Teams like FSU, Washington, and Georgia have more guys with high draft status and don’t need a bowl to prove themselves. But those talented teams will make the 12 team playoff
Posted by captainFid
Vestavia, AL
Member since Dec 2014
4751 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:58 am to
If watching the SEC hold their own [thanks Kentucky] or kick other conferences arses is wrong, I don't want to be right.

PS - Then there is AU.


Seriously though, in the age of NIL, transfer and hearing from a scuzzy agent, that he has a friend, who knows a player who was hurt in a bowl game and it impacted his NFL chances --- this has become a problem. Add to it, increasing the number of bowl games from 17 to 35 in twenty years. Time to reduce that back to a reasonable number in the playoff era.
Posted by Topan
Member since Dec 2009
249 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:26 am to
The bowls are dead because nobody cares including the teams that play in them. When the best players start sitting out even less people will care. Under the new format its only gonna be worse

But cfb needed a better playoff structure to decide who's the champ. Bowl games as we knew them are collateral damage
Posted by LouisianimaI
Member since Dec 2023
576 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:29 am to
That might work. They are spring scrimmages now.
Posted by Tupelo
Member since Aug 2022
1469 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:39 am to
Make it part of the NIL deal. If they opt out of the bowl games, they have to pay a steep penalty. If it ever gets to the point that the players are considered employees of the schools, put a clause in their contracts requiring them to not opt out of games (with penalties if they do, financial and or loss of eligibility).
This post was edited on 12/31/23 at 8:40 am
Posted by Dallaswho
Member since Dec 2023
871 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:50 am to
You don’t need to fix the bowls, you just need to live in reality instead of fantasy land.

1. If “your QB” is already signed with a different team, then he isn’t “your QB” and your best remaining player is not your backup. This is not hard to understand. You just need to pull your head out of your arse.

2. Coaching, recruiting, and culture matter more than ever. If you assemble a team full of babies wearing their initials in diamonds, you may have a shot at a NC, but also don’t be surprised when they quit on you. It’s a gamble.

That being said, you can forget anything I said about Michigan. I hope Bama wins by 50. They seem to be the only team who understands this era.
Posted by Buster83
Member since Aug 2021
3467 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 9:00 am to
Change the portal rules back to what they were pre-Covid. If you enter the portal, you sit out 1 year and only allowed to enter portal once.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119222 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 9:13 am to
Eliminate opt outs.
Move transfer portal to after bowls.
This post was edited on 12/31/23 at 9:14 am
Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
6907 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Pay the players a bonus to play in them? Maybe even a performance bonus?

Just throwing that out there. Don’t shoot me.


That’s what I was thinking.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter