Started By
Message
re: Here's to a well officiated game
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:15 am to genro
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:15 am to genro
quote:
I haven't heard that. I've only heard that it was ruled an incomplete pass. Please show me a link where it says PP7 was ruled out of bounds when he caught the ball.
Yeah, they ruled that PP7 had dropped the ball in-bounds
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:16 am to genro
quote:
I haven't heard that. I've only heard that it was ruled an incomplete pass. Please show me a link where it says PP7 was ruled out of bounds when he caught the ball.
They won't find any, because there was never an explanation given on the play.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:16 am to Riseupfromtherubble
I can't believe anyone would argue the PP interception. PP is a beast (even though he got owned by Crabtree tonight).
It was clearly an interception. Horrible call.
It was clearly an interception. Horrible call.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:16 am to genro
quote:
I should clarify. Touched it before possession was completed.
That's a tough sell based on that video.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:18 am to bmy
quote:Your own brethren are disagreeing with you on that one.
Yeah, they ruled that PP7 had dropped the ball in-bounds
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:18 am to genro
quote:
Your own brethren are disagreeing with you on that one.
It was sarcasm. Patrick Peterson obviously caught the ball. The decision the refs were faced with was did he get his feet in after he demonstrated possession.
This post was edited on 10/30/12 at 12:20 am
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:19 am to Tiger Authority
quote:You also can't prove that Julio didn't touch it based on the video. It actually looks like he does.
That's a tough sell based on that video.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:21 am to genro
If he did, that video looks like he's still in bounds when he does/if he does.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:29 am to Tiger Authority
You just can't tell. Whatever was called on the field was gonna stand.
Bama very likely would've won anyway. LSU was down by a TD with 6 minutes. Even if there had been a turnover there, LSU would've had to go further than they had all game to score. Lee was playing like absolute shite, and LSU's previous two drives had gone for 9 and -8 yards. So
Bama very likely would've won anyway. LSU was down by a TD with 6 minutes. Even if there had been a turnover there, LSU would've had to go further than they had all game to score. Lee was playing like absolute shite, and LSU's previous two drives had gone for 9 and -8 yards. So
Posted on 10/30/12 at 6:04 am to bastropbham
It's not an LSU game........ until one of the rantards comes in here and prebitches about the officiating.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 8:56 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
It's not an LSU game........ until one of the rantards comes in here and prebitches about the officiating.
To be fair, all teams have their share of rantards who have never read the rule book nor read the A.R.'s. The standard is what they WANT it to be....That's why I always get a laugh from these threads.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 8:59 am to bastropbham
DWI
This post was edited on 10/30/12 at 8:59 am
Posted on 10/30/12 at 9:10 am to bastropbham
quote:
No homer calls like Patrick Peterson's "interception" that was waived off by the crimson glassed refs..... wait a minute, we're in Tiger Stadium this weekend! Bring those homer calls on home!
Didn't LSU only get something like 4 yards of total offense in the 2nd half after everyone bitched about that call?
Fine, call that an INT - maybe you would've gotten a total of 8 yards of offense. That outcome would've remained the same... a W for 'bama.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News