Started By
Message
3
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:07 am to genro
clear evidence you say?
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:08 am to genro
I've always wished that Ritter would have given explanation instead of just saying "the ruling on the field stands, incomplete pass."
If he would have said, "the player didn't have control of the ball with a foot down," then that could give us an idea of if they were even looking to see if Jones was touching the ball or not.
If he would have said, "the player didn't have control of the ball with a foot down," then that could give us an idea of if they were even looking to see if Jones was touching the ball or not.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:09 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
He's changing the narrative to conform to what he wants to believe.
I believe Alabama won that game, and the national championship.
A lot like Corey Webster mauled a bama receiver in the end zone when lsu won the national championship
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:09 am to BayouBengals03
quote:Why wouldn't they be?
then that could give us an idea of if they were even looking to see if Jones was touching the ball or not.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:09 am to genro
quote:
Then the call must stand. You near clear evidence to overturn it. Those are the rules of review
Gump logic. You clearly can't understand that there's no evidence of Julio touching the ball. But there is clear evidence of PP7 catching it. Therefore that IS a pick. I'm done here. I'm sure there will be something else for Gumps to bitch about when they lose Saturday night. 
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:10 am to genro
So basically, if they can tell that PP had possession, was in bounds, and intercepted the ball for all intents and purposes, that should be overcome by the mere possibility that Jones may have had a finger tip on the ball even though the video evidence does not support that stance? So basically, let's completely ignore what we watched and rule based on a possibility that is never shown through the video evidence?
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:10 am to j bro12
We all remember 2009 refgate. I want 2012 refgate to go our way. 2009 Alabama/LSU is one of the worst officiated games in the last 5 years. Maybe 10.
This post was edited on 10/30/12 at 12:12 am
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:10 am to hg
quote:Yes, and as I've already stated, that picture is completely irrelevant. Nevermind the fact the possession cannot be determined from a still picture. We're not even arguing possession. We're talking about what happened before that picture.
hg
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:11 am to j bro12
quote:
I'm sure there will be something else for Gumps to bitch about when they lose Saturday night
Yep. Traffic
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:11 am to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
I believe Alabama won that game, and the national championship.
A lot like Corey Webster mauled a bama receiver in the end zone when lsu won the national championship
We're well past changing history and I'm really not trying to. I'm just trying to understand this argument because this is the first I've heard of it honestly.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:12 am to genro
We'll never know, is my point. So much of the focus was if he had possession while tucking the ball away. If I remember correctly, Verne and Danielson were solely focused on his feet.
It's harder for the official to give a brief explanation though, because they aren't actually the one under the hood.
It's harder for the official to give a brief explanation though, because they aren't actually the one under the hood.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:12 am to j bro12
quote:Gump logic = the rules of review? Ok then. I'll take it.
Gump logic.
quote:Except that there is. And there's no clear evidence of him NOT touching the ball. That is important
ou clearly can't understand that there's no evidence of Julio touching the ball
quote:Not if JJ touched it first, which is the entire point.
But there is clear evidence of PP7 catching it. Therefore that IS a pick.
quote:Da fuq? This is all about LSU fans bitching because they lost. 3 damn years ago.
I'm sure there will be something else for Gumps to bitch about when they lose Saturday night.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:12 am to genro
somebody call Mike Pereira and get him in this bitch asap.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:13 am to genro
quote:
Except that there is. And there's no clear evidence of him NOT touching the ball. That is important
It's really not. PP7 was ruled out of bounds.. the ruling on the field was not that Julio touched it first which killed the play. Therefore, there had to be conclusive evidence that Julio had touched it first for your logic to stand.
Bad call and a worse review.
This post was edited on 10/30/12 at 12:14 am
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:13 am to genro
quote:
Nevermind the fact the possession cannot be determined from a still picture.
True.
Tell that to your AllBamaDoesIsWin friend and his stupid youtube video.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:14 am to genro
quote:
Not if JJ touched it first, which is the entire point.
How would he have touched it first? seriously dude? You think he touched it first? And there is nothing on that video, even if we choose to believe that he touched it first, that he was out of bounds when he did.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:14 am to genro
quote:
Nevermind the fact the possession cannot be determined from a still picture.
I tried to convince some Tidefans of this on Reid's interception last year. They couldn't process it either
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:14 am to bmy
quote:I haven't heard that. I've only heard that it was ruled an incomplete pass. Please show me a link where it says PP7 was ruled out of bounds when he caught the ball.
It's really not. PP7 was ruled out of bounds..
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:15 am to Tiger Authority
quote:I should clarify. Touched it before possession was completed.
How would he have touched it first? seriously dude? You think he touched it first? And there is nothing on that video, even if we choose to believe that he touched it first, that he was out of bounds when he did.
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News