Started By
Message
re: Here's to a well officiated game
Posted on 10/29/12 at 11:53 pm to Tiger Authority
Posted on 10/29/12 at 11:53 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
I don't have alters
Good.
quote:
And no, I'm not making a ban bet
Pussy.
quote:
I like this site
As do I.
quote:
not pissing that away
Good for you.
quote:
some impulsive loser on the internet with an Alabama script next to his internet message board handle
quote:
Get a life.
More of one than you've got kid. We'll argue about something else tomorrow. Night.
1
Posted on 10/29/12 at 11:54 pm to Wazoo
quote:
This is the only part i disagree with you about. I don't see how anybody could look at that picture and say it is clear.
Well I suppose you're right, let me try and change that.
It's more clear that Williams has two hands on the ball than it is that Reid does, because Reid didn't. If you can't see Williams has both on it then that's fine, but there is no way you can't see that Reid only had one.
Now night, can't keep my eyes open any longer.
Posted on 10/29/12 at 11:55 pm to j bro12
quote:
INK Yep I guess you're right
After analyzing and conferring with an expert in the field, your image is indeed altered.
Posted on 10/29/12 at 11:55 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
More of one than you've got kid. We'll argue about something else tomorrow. Night.
I guess I'll just take your word for it.
Posted on 10/29/12 at 11:55 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Posted on 10/29/12 at 11:58 pm to genro
quote:
That's a totally irrelevant picture. Before that, Julio was OOB and got a hand on the ball. Play over. FACT.
It was close, but Julio's foot did not come down until after he no longer was touching the ball.
Posted on 10/29/12 at 11:58 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:From the OP's own link
Post a pic of the fact.
Posted on 10/29/12 at 11:59 pm to genro
Because that pic clearly shows Julio's hand on the ball smh. Give it up Gump! Your analysis is asinine.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:00 am to genro
Y'all are terrible at this whole picture and video evidence thing.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:00 am to genro
From that angle it looks like Julio's foot is on the ground, but if you watch the video from the front you can see his foot doesn't come down until the next frame when he is no longer touching the ball.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:01 am to j bro12
quote:Are you saying it's unclear what happened? There's no conclusive evidence? Ergo, it was reasonable to make the call on the field that Julio touched it? And therefore, because there is no conclusive evidence that he didn't, the call must stand under review?
Because that pic clearly shows Julio's hand on the ball smh. Give it up Gump! Your analysis is asinine.
:kige:
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:01 am to genro
PP looks to have possession in bounds.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:01 am to genro
quote:
Are you saying it's unclear what happened? There's no conclusive evidence? Ergo, it was reasonable to make the call on the field that Julio touched it? And therefore, because there is no conclusive evidence that he didn't, the call must stand under review?
Is that what they said? Or is this what you tell yourself to justify the bad call?
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:02 am to hg
This thread is full of retard.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:03 am to Tiger Authority
quote:Actually, what people in this thread have said, was that it was inconclusive therefore the call must be overturned to LSU's favor.
Is that what they said?
Real strong grasp on rules of replay, there.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:05 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
quote:
Are you saying it's unclear what happened? There's no conclusive evidence? Ergo, it was reasonable to make the call on the field that Julio touched it? And therefore, because there is no conclusive evidence that he didn't, the call must stand under review?
Is that what they said? Or is this what you tell yourself to justify the bad call?
That's exactly what he's doing. The ruling on the field was incomplete. The replay clearly shows PP7 with possession and two feet down in bounds. The replay does not clearly show if Julio touched the ball. He sure as hell doesn't touch the ball first.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:05 am to genro
I never said that. I think PP had possession, in bounds, and I see nothing that would even indicate on the video replay that Julio's hand was on the ball while he was out of bounds. The video is what they reviewed.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:06 am to j bro12
quote:
That's exactly what he's doing. The ruling on the field was incomplete. The replay clearly shows PP7 with possession and two feet down in bounds. The replay does not clearly show if Julio touched the ball. He sure as hell doesn't touch the ball first.
He's changing the narrative to conform to what he wants to believe.
Posted on 10/30/12 at 12:06 am to genro
intradesting
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News