Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:09 pm to Tuscaloosa
Didn't you know that their back up qb is better than Dobbs? He'll surely lead them to the promise land.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 4:59 pm to CoachDon
quote:
Tennessee has a better chance to take that "dominant" position than Georgia.
Care to make your case for this?
Posted on 1/16/17 at 5:09 pm to djsdawg
quote:
With those injuries in 2013, Our offense became crippled
Dude WTF are you talking about????Crippled?We freakin finished 2nd in the SEC and lost our best receiver for the year,the best 2nd team RB in the conference for the year,our #2 WR for the year and not to mention TG III missing UT,Vandy.
What other team in the SEC or country could survive those losses and finished 2nd in their conference in offense? Bama and OSU maybe but thats about it.
Our offense wasn't the issue you insipid twit.We lost in
2013 because we had one of the worst defenses in school history.CMR and Bobo were nothing short of miracle workers for what they did with our offense in '13.
quote:
Your question doesn't prove our wr recruiting had been good in richts final 5 years
Get out thd cherry picker...here we go again. That WASN'T your original statement.Now here comes the typical qualifications and deflections.
Once again,which SEC team has more WR's in NFL????
Care to answer????
Posted on 1/16/17 at 5:54 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Our offense wasn't the issue you insipid twit.
So you missed the Vandy and mizzou games. Do I need to provide a link to them? The offense was an issue in both games. Better depth at wr prevents that from occurring. Having a third rb would have helped as well.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 5:57 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
here we go again. That WASN'T your original statemen
We have discussed this topic before, so you should have known exactly what I was talking About. Maybe we did recruit great at wr in richt first ten years, maybe not, but you and I both know we didn't recruit wr well in richts final years. Why this reality causes you to lash out to me like a child is beyond me.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:21 pm to djsdawg
DJsdawg, I agree with you.
Grantham was thrown under the bus for that season, but it was injury after injury on the offense that did us in that year. It was plain to see for anyone watching the games. But if you just look at numbers on paper, you can make up any story you want. Like RD is doing.
Grantham was thrown under the bus for that season, but it was injury after injury on the offense that did us in that year. It was plain to see for anyone watching the games. But if you just look at numbers on paper, you can make up any story you want. Like RD is doing.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:39 pm to djsdawg
quote:
So you missed the Vandy and mizzou games.
Scored 26 and 27 points in each and enough to win.You as well as I do IF YOU WATCHED the game vs Vandy that turnovers and horrible officiating cost us that game.
Mizzou scored on a scoop and score and a hail Mary HB pass.
I'll make this next question easy for you this time.
Besides LSU,who exactly started the season with 4 better
WR's/Slots in 2013 than UGA?
How'd we finish 2nd in the conference in offense in '13?
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:42 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
How'd we finish 2nd in the conference in offense in '13?
Running up the score on North Texas and LSU.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:43 pm to deeprig9
quote:
But if you just look at numbers on paper, you can make up any story you want. Like RD is doing.
Not making up anything and Grantham sucked...not only in'12 but obviously in '13.
Offense bailed his arse out repeatedly both years.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:03 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Scored 26 and 27 points in each and enough to win.
Offense scored 20 vs Vandy, and then you do 23 for UF, and thats an average of 23 ppg, which was a major dropoff from September when we averaged about 3 TDs more.
quote:
who exactly started the season with 4 better
WR's/Slots in 2013 than UGA?
Texas AnM, Mizzou, Bama, and Ole Miss? But I dont know for sure because without injuries, you dont get to see how good your depth is. We know for a fact our depth was not good due to those injuries.
quote:
How'd we finish 2nd in the conference in offense in '13?
We had the 5th best scoring O in the SEC.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 3:12 am to djsdawg
Why are people saying the oline will be full of freshmen. That's not even half true.
Sr. Sims will likely start at guard. RS Jr. Galliard at center. Sr. Wynn likely at guard. The JC kid was brought in specifically for left tackle. The five star kid I would start at right tackle on principle. 6-7 350 still in high school you gotta play the sumbitch.
If an incoming or red shirt freshmen beats any of those upperclassmen out that's actually good news.
Sr. Sims will likely start at guard. RS Jr. Galliard at center. Sr. Wynn likely at guard. The JC kid was brought in specifically for left tackle. The five star kid I would start at right tackle on principle. 6-7 350 still in high school you gotta play the sumbitch.
If an incoming or red shirt freshmen beats any of those upperclassmen out that's actually good news.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 3:33 am to Kimsey
We might start a JUCO or a couple of freshmen. I never expect a JUCO OL to be worth a shite, so a freshman beating him out might not mean much.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 7:08 am to Kimsey
quote:
Why are people saying the oline will be full of freshmen. That's not even half true
The OL is a questionmark. A huge questionmark.
We were bad at OL in 2015 and 2016. And we are replacing 2 tackles and a center. We are potentially looking at 4 or 5 guys starting at different positions in 2017. Chemestry and recognition only come with reps. And we will be starring from ground zero.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 7:35 am to meansonny
quote:
And we will be starring from ground zero
As did Clemsn in '15 and NO,they're success wasn't because of Deshaun's dual threat capability.
Ohio State,Alabama,Florida,Michigan,A&M and Ole Miss all
started a true freshman on their O-lines.There's enough talent coming in and on campus for the O-line to be successful...its up to Pittman and Chaney to get these guys ready to play and put them in a posistion to succeed.
This post was edited on 1/21/17 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 1/17/17 at 9:08 am to RD Dawg
quote:
NO,they're success wasn't because of Deshaun's dual threat capability.
Say what? I wouldn't say it's 100% or anything but it plays a big part in it.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 9:09 am to Kimsey
We've got to get a great center playing again. When Andrews left it killed us.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 9:23 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Kirby is stocking up that roster with elite talent that only Bama & maybe OSU can match
Wow, it only took him 2 recruiting classes to do what its taken Saban and Meyer many years to do. That is impressive.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 11:28 am to RD Dawg
quote:
NO,they're success wasn't because of Deshaun's dual threat capability
It played a role. To claim otherwise further proves how clueless you are.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 11:40 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Didn't you know that their back up qb is better than Dobbs? He'll surely lead them to the promise land.
Now, I'm positive you have no idea who the backup actually is.
Page 11 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News