Started By
Message

re: Fumble return by Ole Miss in Bama game - Gary Danielson

Posted on 9/18/16 at 3:56 pm to
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 3:56 pm to
He grabbed the defender by the arm. What else do you want
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 3:58 pm to
Gary didn't say anything wrong. Any impartial fan would have had the same thoughts. The TD shouldn't have counted and Alabama should have had the ball because of the hit to the head.
Posted by Judah Mann
Houston Area
Member since Aug 2016
2033 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 3:58 pm to
The tackle by Ole Miss DE on Hurts was a thing of beauty. The penalty on #9 during the run back was total BS. A good football analyst would have said as much.
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 4:00 pm
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

If a player is pursuing a ball carrier is he out of the play? If the ball carrier fumbles and a player is 20 yards away.. could he recover? 30 yards away? 40 (~3.5 seconds to arrive if he is already running)? Not easy to put a definition on "obviously out of the play".
He was 30 yards away, but there were at least 4 Ole Miss players closer to the ball carrier. He was out of the play and he wasn't even sprinting down the field.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

If the roles were reversed, and Bama had a personal foul on a fumble return, would Gary talk about it the same way for 20 minutes that it was a blown call?
Yes, because it would be a huge moment in the game.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:02 pm to
quote:


He was 30 yards away, but there were at least 4 Ole Miss players closer to the ball carrier. He was out of the play and he wasn't even sprinting down the field


I agree. Refs fricked up with enforcing the penalty. I don't like the rule, though.
Posted by partsman103
Member since Sep 2008
8090 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:02 pm to
Imo, he went full blown Gump mode which shocked me.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

My point is that the personal foul was for contact against a player who was "obviously out of the play". I think it's a dumb rule because 10 different refs can draw the line in 10 different ways
That's why you don't commit the foul. If there's any question, the foul shall be enforced.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:05 pm to
Also, according to the refs, the play was over because they had already scored. It was pathetic all around.
Posted by ALA2262
Cumming, GA
Member since Jun 2016
1683 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

For real though, definitely one blown call and i agree with Gary that it should have been flagged for targeting so at least it would have been reviewed.


Doesn't have to be called on the field to be reviewed. Or flagged. Can be called and flagged from the booth. New rule this year.

Reviewable Fouls
ARTICLE 8.
The following plays are reviewable and the replay official may create a foul
when there is no call by the on-field officials:
a. Player making a forward pass or forward handoff when beyond the
neutral zone or after a change of possession (Rule 12-3-2-c and –d).
b. Player beyond the neutral zone when kicking the ball (Rule 12-3-4-b).
c. Blocking by Team B players before they are eligible to touch the ball on
an onside kick (Rule 12-3-4-e).
d. The number of players on the field for either team during a live ball
(Rule 12-3-6-a).
e. Illegal touching of a forward pass by an originally eligible receiver who
has gone out of bounds. (Rules 12-3-2-b and 12-3-3-h).
f. Player who is out of bounds touching a free kick that had not been
touched inbounds (Rule 12-3-4-a).
g. Forward pass that becomes illegal as a second pass after an on-field
ruling of a backward pass is reversed (Rule 12-3-2-e).
h. A clear, obvious and egregious targeting foul (Rule 12-3-5-b).
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 4:10 pm
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:05 pm to
quote:


That's why you don't commit the foul. If there's any question, the foul shall be enforced




Some of just want to see the rules enforced in a consistent and fair manner

Bama fans were up in arms defending that hit.. but condemning the hit on Hurts. Fandom is a crazy thing.
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 4:07 pm
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Bama fans were up in arms defending that hit.. but condemning the hit on Hurts. Fandom is a crazy thing.
Completely different scenarios. The QB was acting as a defender in that scenario, and it wasn't immediately following a pass.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Fandom is a crazy thing.
Especially when it doesn't even involve your team.
Posted by Huddie Leadbetter
Member since May 2016
3822 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:24 pm to
quote:



Some of just want to see the rules enforced in a consistent and fair manner

Bama fans were up in arms defending that hit.. but condemning the hit on Hurts. Fandom is a crazy thin


I'm nearly certain that the targeting rule and the penalty for the infraction was changed since that game.
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 4:27 pm
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26957 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

It was pure homerism on display


at all the children in this thread too young to remember Danielson's continued yapping about Terrence Cody taking his helmet off after the FG block against UT...and that time he was actually wrong.
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 4:28 pm
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
24264 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:28 pm to
I don't think the targeting rule was in play in 2012 was it? Btw I hate the targeting rule.
Posted by Goombaw
Kentucky
Member since Jan 2013
5251 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 4:31 pm to
If you think that's a hold it's no wonder you guys are always crying about the refs. You see what you want to see, I guess.

It's amazing to me how people can claim Gary and Verne were biased against Ole Miss when they spent an entire segment talking about the "wonderful" upset of Alabama a couple of years ago. Verne even called it one of his best memories and was excited to receive part of the goalpost.

If they would have had a segment like that about Alabama, this board would say it was further proof of bias. Oh well, it's good to be the king.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 6:15 pm to
quote:


I don't think the targeting rule was in play in 2012 was it? Btw I hate the targeting rule


"Unnecessary roughness" was a rule then (contact against an opponent who is obviously out of the play). Recently QBs were designated as a specific class of defenseless players after turnovers. AFAIK the "out of the play" portion has not changed.
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 6:17 pm
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

"Unnecessary roughness" was a rule then (contact against an opponent who is obviously out of the play).
He wasn't out of the play.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/18/16 at 6:19 pm to
Dude just makes shite up as he goes along.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter