Started By
Message
Fournette or Watson for Heismen
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:10 pm
Who is the front runner in your opinion in 2016
This post was edited on 7/1/16 at 6:11 pm
27
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:11 pm to Modern Socrates
Watson will win it.
Better position, less competition.
Better position, less competition.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:14 pm to Modern Socrates
quote:
Heismen
Maybe both if they are giving away more than one this year?
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:16 pm to Modern Socrates
Fournette doesn't even get an invite to NYC.
Again.
Again.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:17 pm to Modern Socrates
McCaffrey.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:32 pm to GIbson05
He'll get an invite just to make up for the travesty of him not getting invited last year. Possibly the biggest snub in Heisman history.
This post was edited on 7/1/16 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:33 pm to Modern Socrates
Watson
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:35 pm to Modern Socrates
I like Scarbrough's chances to be honest.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:38 pm to Modern Socrates
Watson.
If a RB wins it, it will be Cook.
If a RB wins it, it will be Cook.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:39 pm to Modern Socrates
Fournette is the best player in college ball but Watson will win it.
No way they can give it to a SEC running back to back.
No way they can give it to a SEC running back to back.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:40 pm to Modern Socrates
Saw both in person
Watson is infinitely better
Watson is infinitely better
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:42 pm to Modern Socrates
Watson.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:43 pm to Modern Socrates
I honestly don't know if. Of the only 2 options I'd say Watson.
I got laughed at for suggesting Henry could win this time last year ("he's not even the best back in the SEC") So I'll put my hopes for Ridley or Scarborough as our dark horse shots of getting an invite to New York at least.
I got laughed at for suggesting Henry could win this time last year ("he's not even the best back in the SEC") So I'll put my hopes for Ridley or Scarborough as our dark horse shots of getting an invite to New York at least.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:46 pm to Modern Socrates
If the Heisman was really what it's suppose to represent, then Mcaffrey would have won it last year, and would win it this year.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:50 pm to Lordofwrath88
quote:
laughed at for suggesting Henry could win this time last year ("he's not even the best back in the SEC")
Crazy thing is those who laughed at you were correct.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:25 pm to Columbia
quote:
the Heisman was really what it's suppose to represent, then Mcaffrey would have won it last year, and would win it this year.
THIS. The nations rushing leader wasn't invited... That's the next travesty...
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:31 pm to Choctaw
quote:
He'll get an invite just to make up for the travesty of him not getting invited last year. Possibly the biggest snub in Heisman history.
He came in 6th. Who should he have replaced? 
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:37 pm to Modern Socrates
Top 2 definitely. Im going with Watson. He was amazing last year, esp in the Championship game putting ball after ball in the perfect spots. Just super clutch. Tough to beat a great QB bc they touch the ball every play on offense.
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:39 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
I thought Boyd was a great college QB but Watson is even better than him
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:40 pm to JuiceTerry
Atleast 3 people ahead of him
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News