Started By
Message
re: ESPN in bed with 'BAMA
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:40 pm to Bamatab
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:40 pm to Bamatab
Bama was lucky to win 3 out of the last 4 BCS Championship games. Just look at tPOS dogs they got to play in the Championship games. If they had played a really good team in any of those games they might not have won. Maybe this year Bama will have to play against a team that should have been there rather than teams like Texas, LSU and ND who showed they did not have the balls needed to take the Crystal.
This post was edited on 8/19/13 at 2:42 pm
0
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:42 pm to enufodis
Typical LSU thread.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:43 pm to mograyback
quote:
Typical LSU thread.
Oh well. Leave.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:45 pm to mograyback
quote:
mograyback
Missouri has fans?
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:47 pm to KennesawTiger
quote:
, I saw a butch lesbian with one tooth wearing houndstooth and a Bama hat, shouting "Roowwww Tahhhd" at the top of her lungs.
Pics or it didn't happen.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:52 pm to cyde
quote:
Pics or it didn't happen.
You say that like its hard to believe.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:55 pm to enufodis
Alabama couldn't get a bigger hurdle from a team every year like they do from LSU. Their schedule isn't as strong as a lot of SEC teams but idk why y'all pretend its Boise state caliber.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:55 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
The reason why Bama got in over Oklahoma St. is because the LSU/Bama game was so close
Bama didn't have any more of an argument than Michigan did in the previous scenario.
Bama had the SEC, Saban, and the networks.
The Oklahoma vs. Oklahoma St. game was a fricking infomercial for Bama. The entire game was played with a ticker on the bottom of the screen, pronouncing Alabama as number 2.
Every possible scenario for Oklahoma St. to capture the second spot went overwhelmingly in their favor, just as it did in '07 for LSU.
But, unfortunately for Oklahoma St. fans, their conference carries no clout, and their coach was more than happy to face anybody other than the SEC.
Alabama was the second best team at season's end, it was just a lose-lose for LSU. And I'd feel the same way for Alabama if the roles were reversed.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 2:56 pm to gnarkill1529
quote:
why do you always show up in these threads and whine about scheduling?
You don't have to be an LSU or Florida fan to see the unfairness of the permanent opponent rule.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 3:02 pm to KennesawTiger
quote:
You say that like its hard to believe.
It's not inconceivable, of course, but just in time for you to come post it in this thread?
How about this. You worry about LSU's embarrassing rednecks and we'll worry about Alabama's.
After all, is it hard to believe that, while driving through Louisiana just now, I was tiger baited by a toothless whore spilling out of her purple tube top as she stumbled out of a men's room at a rest area on I-10?
Posted on 8/19/13 at 3:07 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
You don't have to be an LSU or Florida fan to see the unfairness of the permanent opponent rule.
Your stock response doesn't answer the question.
Just stick to whatever LSU poster you usually post as. That way we know you are just a bitch, not a bitch hiding behind something.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 3:15 pm to wahoocs
quote:
Bama didn't have any more of an argument than Michigan did in the previous scenario.
Florida got in by a whisker -- just a hundredth of a point in the Bowl Championship Series Standings.
The Gators had a BCS average of .944, and the Wolverines were just behind at .934. The teams were tied in the computer ratings, but Florida had a 38-point lead in the Harris poll and a 26-point advantage in the coaches' poll.
The ironic thing is that my Buckeyes would have been better off getting a rematch with Michigan instead of Florida.
This post was edited on 8/19/13 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 8/19/13 at 3:21 pm to Sheetbend
LSU is going to destroy the gumps on their own field. LSU's new offense will make what JFF did to ya'll look like a tune up game. Just you wait. 
This whole thread is stupid. Who the hell cares what ESPN does they are sports entertainment.
This whole thread is stupid. Who the hell cares what ESPN does they are sports entertainment.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 3:24 pm to TigerFanNKaty
quote:
LSU's new offense
Posted on 8/19/13 at 3:31 pm to Dr RC
quote:
the selection committee is going to do everything they can to avoid any conference having two participants.
And to keep things fair for the other conferences, keep the SEC out altogether every other year or so?
Posted on 8/19/13 at 3:34 pm to TigerFanNKaty
quote:
LSU's new offense
Posted on 8/19/13 at 3:36 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:03 pm to wahoocs
quote:
The reason why Bama got in over Oklahoma St. is because the LSU/Bama game was so close
The reason Bama got in was b/c they were the second best team at the time. You corndogs really believe that Okie was the 2nd best team? Of course you don't. You just wanted the easier route.
I imagine you also are hoping JFF won't play in the game against LSU, unlike the vast majority of Alabama fans who want him on the field 9/14.
Great teams with great long term winning tradition do not take the easy way out. When LSU fans realize that and take it to heart, you may be considered one of the elite. You don't see UT complaining about playing Bama every year, nor did Bama complain about playing them when they were at the top, nor do you see AU complaining about playing GA. Stop being such whiny asses. There is a reason we are the Big 4. DWI
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:10 pm to chattabama
21-0...discussion over.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 4:14 pm to Mr. Misanthrope
quote:
...to keep things fair for the other conferences, make the SEC drop their permanent cupcake non-divisional opponent rule.
Fixed it for you.
This post was edited on 8/19/13 at 4:18 pm
Page 6 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News