Started By
Message
re: Cowherd takes shots at Alabama scheduling and the SEC
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:33 pm to skrayper
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:33 pm to skrayper
The bridge schedules are a joke, nothing you can do about it, win your games and it works out. I like Florida on the schedule every year, always a great game. The best way to solve any "unfairness" is to only count the division records to determine the East and West rep in Atlanta. Can we at least agree on that?
2
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:33 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
It doesn't matter if LSU whines, cries or just politely bends over, they are getting royally screwed.
It's going to be this way as long as the Bama-hat(that they bought from the Walmarks) wearing SEC office employees continue to take matters into their own hands.
They don't like "those dumb cajuns" competing with the almighty "Tahhd"
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:34 pm to skrayper
quote:
Texas A&M's schedule is easier.
So I'm not sure what Cowherd's beef is.
Cowherd's beef is that Alabama keeps getting to the ship with that weak schedule.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:35 pm to joeytiger
quote:
The best way to solve any "unfairness" is to only count the division records to determine the East and West rep in Atlanta.
This is what should be done. There's no excuse.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:38 pm to wadewilson
Please don't bring common sense into this discussion .
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:42 pm to Herman Frisco
Seriously, why can't division records be used to select the two division champions? It makes the most sense to do it this way and allows the continuance of all "rivalry" games. I have a feeling a certain school would not like this idea.
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:45 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Cowherd's beef is that Alabama keeps getting to the ship with that weak schedule.
again look at sos for each team since 2008. Not the disparity y'all make it out to be. You lost to a terrible Florida team that Bama would have beaten. Look at our record versus Florida and realize the team y'all lost to was embarrassed by Loiville and yet y'all still cry about it while fishing your last two seasons losing your bowl games especially against Clemson. After all you got to play a team in your home state that y'all had beaten once already, so it seems all of the advantage was yours.Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:50 pm to labamafan
quote:
You lost to a terrible Florida team that Bama would have beaten.
We also soundly beat Texas ATM, keep trying.
quote:
while fishing your last two seasons losing your bowl games
shite, Alabama has gotten national championships for losing bowl games.
quote:
After all you got to play a team in your home state that y'all had beaten once already
Yeah, we both know how that story started.
You're a dipshit.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:54 pm to KennesawTiger
quote:
They don't like "those dumb cajuns" competing with the almighty "Tahhd"
And now I see why.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:56 pm to wadewilson
stings a little doesn't it tough guy. Problem is everything I said was true.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:00 pm to wadewilson
division records only would be fine. But that just isn't how it is done right now.
Next thing you know it will somehow be Alabama's fault that we don't determine division champs this way.
Next thing you know it will somehow be Alabama's fault that we don't determine division champs this way.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:02 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
I wonder who Alabama will lose to at home this year
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:03 pm to skrayper
As Bama fans why can't you acknowledge the obvious truth to the LSU fans on the RANT?
Why can’t you agree that LSU is at a competitive disadvantage as long as Florida remains their permanent opponent?
Why can’t you freely acknowledge that you are very happy indeed to keep the advantage as long as Florida remains an SEC perennial power, and Tennessee remains an SEC cellar dweller?
While Bama doesn’t have an unfair advantage against TAM like they do against LSU, Florida is the main reason why Bama went to the SEC C.G. last year instead of TAM.
Instead, the Bama fans flame the LSU fans by calling them whiners and crybabies. If you don't want to be honest, who are the real trolls on this thread?
Why can’t you agree that LSU is at a competitive disadvantage as long as Florida remains their permanent opponent?
Why can’t you freely acknowledge that you are very happy indeed to keep the advantage as long as Florida remains an SEC perennial power, and Tennessee remains an SEC cellar dweller?
While Bama doesn’t have an unfair advantage against TAM like they do against LSU, Florida is the main reason why Bama went to the SEC C.G. last year instead of TAM.
Instead, the Bama fans flame the LSU fans by calling them whiners and crybabies. If you don't want to be honest, who are the real trolls on this thread?
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:04 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Alabama has gotten national championships for losing bowl games.
Name a BCS title game we lost. Bama closes.
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:05 pm to EvilVodka
damn that really stings.
Just kidding. SEC and BCS Champs last year. I wonder how many teams LSU will let drive down the field to win the game at the end of the 4th quarter this year.
Just kidding. SEC and BCS Champs last year. I wonder how many teams LSU will let drive down the field to win the game at the end of the 4th quarter this year.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:06 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
I wonder how many teams LSU will let drive down the field to win the game at the end of the 4th quarter this year.
All of them.
Didn't you hear? LSU lost ALL their players to draft. They can't field a team.
0-12.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:06 pm to joeytiger
Only counting division games is more fair, but the argument against it is that it makes the cross-division games essentially OOC games and therefore less important. I think the SEC is going to want each conference game to have max importance especially with the SEC network coming online.
Personally, I don't have an issue with only counting division games. Just wanted to provide the potential reason the change won't be made.
Personally, I don't have an issue with only counting division games. Just wanted to provide the potential reason the change won't be made.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:06 pm to labamafan
I really don't think the schedule and playing for National Championships would be an issue IF other teams would have taken care of their own business.
Oklahoma State jizzed on themselves, Baylor absolutely destroyed an over rated Kansas squad and Stanford took care of the Ducks in OT.
Had the above teams handled their business, Bama would not be in possession of the last 3 of 4 Crystal trophies.
Oklahoma State jizzed on themselves, Baylor absolutely destroyed an over rated Kansas squad and Stanford took care of the Ducks in OT.
Had the above teams handled their business, Bama would not be in possession of the last 3 of 4 Crystal trophies.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:08 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
wonder who Alabama will lose to at home this y
Won't matter we are more respected than LSU and will get to the title game any way. Y'all have spent too many years in the suck to be taken seriously on a national level. Don't worry you can cry about that and I am sure they'll change it for you.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:11 pm to partsman103
Is this not the case EVERY year? Someone losing ALWAYS allows some one else to go.
Page 34 of 37
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News