Started By
Message
re: Could Auburn have a Bama-like dynasty?
Posted on 12/27/13 at 7:02 pm to daBIGKAHUNA
Posted on 12/27/13 at 7:02 pm to daBIGKAHUNA
Says the fan of a TWO LOSS National Champion and the other one was "shared" with USC.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 7:09 pm to MsGarrison
I just had to take the time to say
hahahahahahahahahahahahah
to the OP.
hahahahahahahahahahahahah
to the OP.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 7:11 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
Says the fan of a TWO LOSS National Champion and the other one was "shared" with USC.
Atleast USC shares with us
You got nothing in 04..because well..you're auburn
Posted on 12/27/13 at 7:42 pm to GooseSix
Come on guys, I had just suppressed the hatred to actually go for Auburn in the Championship because you do play in the SEC. Let's not get a big head.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:01 pm to Tiger365
It's really gonna be hard to call it a dynasty when you throw in a 0 sec win season in between a championship and a chance to win another . Lets don't get things twisted bama is still in the middle of the dynasty we lost 1 fluke game this year and if we win the sugar bowl that would be back to back champs then a one loss year with a sugar bowl victory. I think every team would be happy with 6 losses in 5 years with 3 championships and consider that a dynasty.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:02 pm to MsGarrison
No; you can't go winless in the SEC and claim a dynasty.
Considering some AU fans are claiming a single loss has "ended" Bama's dynasty, I'm not sure how you're going to fit 8 in a single season somewhere in there.
Considering some AU fans are claiming a single loss has "ended" Bama's dynasty, I'm not sure how you're going to fit 8 in a single season somewhere in there.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:32 pm to MsGarrison
SEC coaches have a year to study auburn's offense
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:44 pm to narddogg81
quote:
nobody but auburn fans thinks your team is any good. Lucky yes, good no. You have less business playing in the championship game this year than Notre dame did last year.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:45 pm to MsGarrison
Well 1/10/11 to 1/6/14 is almost exactly three years. LOL at all the math snobs that don't know math.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:47 pm to daBIGKAHUNA
quote:
You didn't even dominate your schedule this year
This is a criteria now? So basically there hasn't been a legit championship team at LSU for over a half century?
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:48 pm to masseylaw
quote:
Correct. They were 1 second away from it, most likely. You really have to have 3 NC's in a row for a dynasty.
You don't have to win MNCs in a row but you do have to win your conference more than twice in 6 years
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:52 pm to VerlanderBEAST
Bama has backed into a NC.. Auburn has won the SEC both times they have played for the National Championship..
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:54 pm to MsGarrison
a sec winless season in between going to two BCS Nc games constitutes a dynasty?????
This post was edited on 12/27/13 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 12/27/13 at 8:56 pm to oR33Do
laugh now but AU will contend next year and beyond
Posted on 12/27/13 at 9:06 pm to LSU1NSEC
quote:
SEC coaches have a year to study auburn's offense
ummmmmmmm, this is year four of "Auburn's Offense". You know the damndest thing? It hasn't looked the same in any one of those four years.
This post was edited on 12/27/13 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 12/27/13 at 9:29 pm to MsGarrison
You mean the type of dynasty where you win the SEC west once in a 4 year period? Not much of a dynasty.
Posted on 12/27/13 at 9:42 pm to SBC
The question is dynasty and the answer is NO....not unless AU grows a defense that is stout. You cant count on miracles every year..its hard to draw those up on playbooks.
But I will be hoping you beat the snot out of the girls school.
But I will be hoping you beat the snot out of the girls school.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News