Started By
Message
re: Could Auburn have a Bama-like dynasty?
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:29 am to jbond
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:29 am to jbond
quote:
IF Auburn wins it'll be 2 in 4 years, not 2 in 3. With so many good teams are in the west right now (TAMU, LSU, Bama, AU, Ole Miss) it's hard to picture any team having a dynasty in the near future.
2011 and 2012 were unremarkable seasons.
Furthermore, the dynasty required significantly more on the field breaks that other dynasties, i.e. Auburn wasn't a dominant program during that 4 year period.
1
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:37 am to MsGarrison
Auburn is a real Schizophrenic program. No one, in short periods of time, goes from really outstanding to really horrendous seasons and vice versa as quickly as Auburn does. We saw it under Bowden, Tuberville and Chizick.
No one can predict the future but I see a trend here, Malzhan can easily have a losing season in the relatively near future. No “Dynasty” includes that.
No one can predict the future but I see a trend here, Malzhan can easily have a losing season in the relatively near future. No “Dynasty” includes that.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:38 am to wadewilson
Just a minor hiccup in the dynasty.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:41 am to crimsonsaint
NOPE...
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:45 am to MsGarrison
Naw, Winston Did it Big Den!!
Sorry!
Sorry!
This post was edited on 1/10/14 at 9:53 am
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:52 am to MsGarrison
quote:
2 NCs within a 3/4 year period.
WTF is this? you can't have 2 in 3 if someone has 2 in the middle. Does auburn even math bro?
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:54 am to MsGarrison
Posted on 1/10/14 at 9:59 am to Gardevoir
quote:This is funny coming from a gump...
Furthermore, the dynasty required significantly more on the field breaks that other dynasties,
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:05 am to That LSU Guy
And they still only have 1 in 3 years. Or is it 4? I don't know, I've never taken auburn math
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:07 am to MsGarrison
Garrison spews his retardness almost every day with dumb threads during the weeks leading up to the title game and of course hasn't posted since.
Makes sense.
Makes sense.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:08 am to GCTiger11
What a pussy
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:17 am to The_Joker
quote:
And they still only have 1 in 3 years. Or is it 4?
1 in the last 50+.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:20 am to Master of Sinanju
Semantics
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:21 am to MsGarrison
quote:
Could Auburn have a Bama-like dynasty?
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:32 am to MsGarrison
quote:
Could Auburn have a Bama-like dynasty?
Maybe could have if y'all didn't get rid of the coach that could actually win the NC.
National Championship winning head coach Gene Chizik.
Y'all fricked up.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:38 am to VVega
quote:
WTF is this? you can't have 2 in 3 if someone has 2 in the middle. Does auburn even math bro?
Ha Ha Ha!
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:42 am to tivey6301
What happened to the dynasty?
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:46 am to TreyAnastasio
The answer to this legitimate question is in this short 10 sec video: LINK
This post was edited on 1/10/14 at 10:48 am
Posted on 1/10/14 at 10:56 am to MsGarrison
No. Defenses will slowly but surely figure out the Malzahn remedy. FSU did this in one half of football.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 11:10 am to MsGarrison
This post was edited on 1/10/14 at 11:14 am
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News