Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:21 pm to ChallboiMatt
quote:
Usual Gamecock way scratching and clawing for any chance to be relative.
Congrats MIZZOU!
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:22 pm to Crimson Legend
Why can't it ever be good enough to say Mizzou and USC both had very good seasons. They should both be given kudos for the year those two programs had imo.
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:22 pm to Mizzoufan26
quote:
Twice we have lost to your shite arse team when we shouldn't have.
I think you mean once. Can't see how Mizzou shouldn't have lost the 2012 game
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:22 pm to ChallboiMatt
This is what happens if you don't think the Cocks were 2nd.
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:23 pm to reedus23
quote:Well we could not possible make it easier for them to do that.
It does speak volumes about certain SC posters that they feel the need to hijack a thread about mizzou and say "hey what about me! Look at me!"
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:24 pm to Mizzoufan26
quote:
Is that the fricking bat signal, you all come out of the woodwork after that?
I'm just saying there is no clear cut number 2 team. Arguments could be made for Mizzou USC and Bama
quote:
Mizzoufan26
Oh right. Incapable of logic. Sorry for the confusion
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:26 pm to reedus23
quote:
It does speak volumes about certain SC posters that they feel the need to hijack a thread about mizzou and say "hey what about me! Look at me!"
Couldn't have said it better myself. Typical white trash gamecock fan from Union or Rock Hill that have had their first taste of success. They don't know how to deal with it
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:28 pm to ChallboiMatt
quote:
Couldn't have said it better myself. Typical white trash gamecock fan from Union or Rock Hill that have had their first taste of success. They don't know how to deal with it
ya u tell dem bro
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:29 pm to Crimson Legend
South Carolina is the second best team in the SEC.
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:31 pm to Dubosed
quote:
South Carolina is the second best team in the SEC.
5 more pages
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:32 pm to Gcockboi
quote:
We finished number 2 asswhipe. Tbh if we played Auburn n the SEC championship I don't see them stopping Shaw and our receivers plus MD.
Oh, wow.
Put down the crack pipe, child, that stuff is bad for you.
Thank you to the OP, very classy and much appreciated. We're so happy to be in the SEC, and glad we could contribute and be successful this year.
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:32 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
I'm just saying there is no clear cut number 2 team. Arguments could be made for Mizzou USC and Bama
Yeah, you've said that. A lot. You can leave now.
If we aren't considering losses though apparently Tennesse and UGA have to be in there as well.
Tennessee beat a non division winning USCe team.
Georgia also beat a non division winning USCe team.
They should be in the consideration based on merit alone. (Not considering losses, since we don't do that here apparently)
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:34 pm to Mizzoufan26
quote:
Tennessee beat a non division winning USCe team.
Georgia also beat a non division winning USCe team.
two extremely impressive SEC wins this season, no doubt.
our team has been very hard to beat as of late, as mizzou fans know well
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:35 pm to A$AP Cocky
quote:
two extremely impressive SEC wins this season, no doubt.
our team has been very hard to beat as of late, as mizzou fans know well
Unless the game is meaningful in any way OFC.
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:39 pm to Mizzoufan26
quote:
Unless the game is meaningful in any way OFC.
true, except when playing Mizzou. then we're all good, even if spotting a few points here and there
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:39 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Why can't it ever be good enough to say Mizzou and USC both had very good seasons. They should both be given kudos for the year those two programs had imo.
Thank you. A voice of reason. Unfortunately, that's not the way the rant works. Good luck tomorrow!
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:41 pm to A$AP Cocky
quote:
true, except when playing Mizzou. then we're all good, even if spotting a few points here and there
Had no meaning to us, we still made the SECCG
Had we won the SECCG we were in the Natty.
Wouldn't have had a sugar bowl over Bama even if we had beaten you.
Zero meaning to us.
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:48 pm to Mizzoufan26
quote:
Yeah, you've said that. A lot. You can leave now.
If we aren't considering losses though
Nobody is saying that.
If you're making an argument for USC you focus on wins because they have bad losses. If you're arguing Mizzou you focus on losses because they only lost to top 10 teams but don't have super impressive victories.
Not sure why some Mizzou posters are so butthurt over others thinking they aren't the undisputed number 2. Both had great seasons and it really doesn't matter.
But you are incapable of logic so that might explains it
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:53 pm to Mizzoufan26
quote:
Had no meaning to us, we still made the SECCG
right
mattered at the time, no matter what anyone says
Page 6 of 14
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News