Started By
Message

re: Comparing USC and Texas A&M side by side

Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by DawgFanDave
Member since Oct 2013
261 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:19 pm to
A&M is a good job.
USC is a destination job.
Posted by BuckYoshi
Member since Nov 2013
740 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

The one where LA is a shitty place to live and California cost of living is ridiculous.


You have never been to the good parts of LA. Definitely not shitty and a coach of Sumlin's caliber will have no problem with California's cost of living.

USC is still historically one of the best CFB jobs and definitely top 5 currently. He would have a much easier time recruiting California than having to go against Saban/SEC, Texas & Big12

But I don't think USC will get Sumlin. They're after a NFL like coach would be my best guess.
Posted by Chad44
Studio City
Member since Jul 2009
528 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:21 pm to
He said LA is a shitty place to live.

I'm moving to CS because it must be heaven on earth.
This post was edited on 11/14/13 at 2:22 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145136 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:23 pm to
Get the frick out of here you condom piece of shite
Posted by relapse98
Member since Dec 2010
2736 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

A&M is a good job.
USC is a destination job.



No shite, that's why Sumlin is GONE.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44017 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

I'm moving to CS because it must be heaven on earth.

It is.
Not a day goes by where I don't miss it.
Posted by relapse98
Member since Dec 2010
2736 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

I'm moving to CS because it must be heaven on earth.


Please don't.

We've had enough of California douches moving to Texas. Sorry folks parks closed, Moose out front shoulda told ya.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145136 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

We've had enough of California douches moving to Texas.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:32 pm to
A&M-College Station's endowment is NOT $7-plus billion.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145136 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:33 pm to
That's the system wide endowment. Pretty sure the CS endowment is 5 billion
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44017 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

A&M-College Station's endowment is NOT $7-plus billion.

Correct, WCA.

From the university's website:
quote:

Texas A&M College Station [not TAMU system] has an endowment valued at more than $5 billion, which ranks fourth among U.S. public universities and 10th overall
This post was edited on 11/14/13 at 2:40 pm
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:41 pm to
Yes, I'm aware that is the System-wide endowment, hence, my reply that $7-plus billion is incorrect.
Posted by WheelRoute
Washington, D.C.
Member since Oct 2013
1811 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:41 pm to
The difference b/w Texas and Cali's overall tax burden is a couple of percentage points. In other words, a small price to pay for the significant lifestyle upgrade of living on the beach.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145136 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:42 pm to
I'm aware you know its the system wide endowment, just making it known for everyone else
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145136 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:43 pm to
This will catch a few
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:46 pm to
What were talking about is a JOB. It's just like any other job. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the job itself.

quote:

You have never been to the good parts of LA. Definitely not shitty

There are great places in LA. Every city has good parts. I am referring to the traffic, pollution, noise, etc. If you live close to USC's campus, you are living in the ghetto. If you live somewhere nice, it takes you 3 hours to get to the office. That makes the job a lot less attractive.

quote:

and a coach of Sumlin's caliber will have no problem with California's cost of living.

Really? If they double his salary, he is make less money than he currently makes at A&M when all factors are considered. You think he is going to have "no problem" with California's cost of living?

quote:


USC is still historically one of the best CFB jobs and definitely top 5 currently. He would have a much easier time recruiting California than having to go against Saban/SEC, Texas & Big12

USC regularly recruits against UCLA, ASU, U Dub, Stanford, and most notably Oregon, which was built on LA high school football.

quote:

But I don't think USC will get Sumlin. They're after a NFL like coach would be my best guess.


This is what I think as well. I also don't think there is much of an advantage to going from a job where the facilities are top notch, recruiting is top 10, fans and administration are patient, and recruiting is done via the Swaggcopter. USC has many perks, but no advantage that would cause a coach to move from one top 25 all-time program to another. It would be foolishly risky, given the state of USC football.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:48 pm to
That's a 50-percent exaggeration of your endowment.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145136 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:49 pm to
If you had fricking eyes, you could see that I said this chart was stupid on the first page sip
Posted by Swan Ronson
City of Dreams
Member since Oct 2013
104 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:49 pm to
Oh.... THAT USC...
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145136 posts
Posted on 11/14/13 at 2:50 pm to
Yes. The real one
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter