Started By
Message
re: Cal is allowed to do just about anything: GIF updated in OP
Posted on 1/29/14 at 9:39 am to TheDoc
Posted on 1/29/14 at 9:39 am to TheDoc
Notice the ref in the background not even looking that way. Cal may get away with a lot in recruiting, but this wasn't catering to him purposefully as y'all are trying to act. It was a harmless action that had no affect on that play much less the game.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 9:39 am to nc14
That was against LSU. Daddy Dale made it known he wasn't happy about it. That spawned one of Knight's best retorts (even though it was a disparaging remark against my team's coach)
quote:
"As long as the Dale Browns of the world are in disagreement with me, then I think I'm in pretty good shape," he said. As for the tournament game in question, Knight conceded that, with five minutes left, he thought his Hoosiers might be in jeopardy. "Then I looked down the floor and saw Dale Brown, and I knew, well, we had a chance."
Posted on 1/29/14 at 9:52 am to craigbiggio
I didn't read all 6 pages so this may have been covered. I've played, coached, and/or officiated for over 35 years. The rulebook at just about every level states that a coach who steps on the playing floor DURING PLAY is subject to a technical foul. A coach who physically interferes with ANY player during play is subject to a technical foul AND disciplinary action up to and including ejection and suspension. It's up to the official(s) and whether he has the balls to make the call or calls.
Key words: "subject to"
Key words: "subject to"
This post was edited on 1/29/14 at 9:58 am
Posted on 1/29/14 at 9:58 am to NOSTRODAMUS
I don't think anyone is arguing that it is against the rules or could have been called a tech
most are just saying it had no affect of the play at hand and should not garner this much bitching
most are just saying it had no affect of the play at hand and should not garner this much bitching
Posted on 1/29/14 at 9:59 am to Salmon
I love how half of the replies are "coaches go on the court all the time". Some people are really slow.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:00 am to Salmon
I hear you. On the other hand, fouling someone while they're shooting may not have affected the shot but it's still a foul and is "subject to" being called.
This post was edited on 1/29/14 at 10:02 am
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:16 am to MSUbulldogs03
you are fricking stupid. It had a big impact on the fricking action. He pushed a player into position and it lead to a 3 for uk. It was at worst a 4 point swing in the game.
it would be one thing to bitch about him being a assclown for being on the court. That isn't the issue though, the issue is physically touching a player during live action. I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand what is going on here.
it would be one thing to bitch about him being a assclown for being on the court. That isn't the issue though, the issue is physically touching a player during live action. I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand what is going on here.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:17 am to Salmon
except it did have one, his player was in the wrong spot. He pushed him into the right spot and then another uk player popped out for a easy wide open 3. If that player wasn't pushed into position then the UK play wasn't going to work.
and you are wrong KCMO was trying to say it isn't against the rules.
and you are wrong KCMO was trying to say it isn't against the rules.
This post was edited on 1/29/14 at 10:18 am
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:19 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:
and you are wrong KCMO was trying to say it isn't against the rules
Hopefully that was just a troll. Surely no one is that dumb.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:22 am to heartbreakTiger
Haha you seriously think that tiny shove of a player 15 feet from where the three was shot is the reason he made the shot? Say it out loud to yourself before typing it.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:26 am to MSUbulldogs03
yes it matters. how do you know how tiny the shove was? that looks like pretty decent shove from cal and if he hadn't done that then who knows what that player does. He might have just stood their like a retard and been in the way. If he was in that spot then uk wouldn't have been able to get a open 3 because of where the d was. So yes cal coming onto the court and actually physically moving a player is a big deal. Coach on the court, not a big deal, coach touching a player is a big deal. why even have fricking rules if we aren't going to enforce any of them. Hell maybe when we play state jones can trip your guy before a 3 point shot and we can all say that little trip always happens.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:27 am to heartbreakTiger
LAWL, there are legit retards in this thread.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:28 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:
you are fricking stupid. It had a big impact on the fricking action. He pushed a player into position and it lead to a 3 for uk. It was at worst a 4 point swing in the game.
it would be one thing to bitch about him being a assclown for being on the court. That isn't the issue though, the issue is physically touching a player during live action. I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand what is going on here.
All of this.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:29 am to bbap
^^^^ Thats how I know its a tiny shove haha. The fact that you're bitching over that proves that you are a huge pussy and must not know a damn thing about basketball if you've never seen something like that happen before.
To make it even better, you can obviously tell the player was already about to cut inside just as Cal goes to push him.
To make it even better, you can obviously tell the player was already about to cut inside just as Cal goes to push him.
This post was edited on 1/29/14 at 10:31 am
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:29 am to MSUbulldogs03
In everyone's haste to declare LSU fans 'butthurt' they are ignoring the fact that the coach entered the court and physically moved one of his own players. In what sport is it legal for a coach to enter the field of play and put players into position?
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:29 am to bbap
pretty clear from the gif that if cal doesn't move him there is going to be no open 3 because the kid was going the completely wrong direction for the play.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:30 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
Haha you seriously think that tiny shove of a player 15 feet from where the three was shot is the reason he made the shot? Say it out loud to yourself before typing it.
You're defending a coaching going on to the court during live play and pushing a player to get into the right position while the other player makes a wide open three
You are all kinds of stupid
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:30 am to MSUbulldogs03
I have probably played more basketball than you and I have never seen that during a game. Practice sure but we are talking about a live game.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News