Started By
Message

Better Quarterback - Blake Sims or Nick Marshall?

Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:20 am
Posted by Big Balls
Texas
Member since Nov 2014
845 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:20 am
They are some-what similar in style and both pretty good qbs. If you had to have one as qb for your team...which would you rather?

I'm not trolling here, BTW...There was an article in the T-News where Cecil Hurt was comparing all qbs in the SEC and said that it could be argued that Marshall might be better than B. Sims.
This post was edited on 11/21/14 at 11:22 am
Posted by CrimsonCrusade
Member since Jan 2014
5154 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:22 am to
Marshall is faster and more athletic, but I think Sims is perhaps a little more elusive. I think Marshall throws a better deep ball, but Sims protects the ball better. Both work very well within their respective offenses.
This post was edited on 11/21/14 at 11:25 am
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79237 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:23 am to
Sims is more versatile. Nick is good in the right system and is pretty clutch.

If in the AU situation from last year, Marshall. Probably Sims in most other situations.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91648 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:23 am to
Knowing what we know with no hypothetical scenarios, it's Nick Marshall.
Posted by David Cornwell
Member since Jun 2014
983 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:23 am to
Sims has a 18-3 TD-INT ratio and one of the best 3rd down conversion rates in the country, if not the best. Sims could also run Gusmalfunction's offense too if he wanted.

Sims>Marshall
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86519 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:23 am to
One might, potentially play quarterback in the NFL. One definitely will not.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52717 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:24 am to
I'd take Sims in our offense. Smarter, better in the pocket, better decision-maker, better on short-intermediate throws.
Posted by InfernoOrangeSS
Pelham, AL
Member since Mar 2014
815 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:25 am to
Both are excellent QBs, I think. Equally gifted. I would choose Mashall only because he appears to never be rattled. Like he has ice water in his veins. (I could see Sims achieving this as well with each win boosting his confidence.)
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:26 am to
Lol, no.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79237 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Both are excellent QBs, I think. Equally gifted. I would choose Mashall only because he appears to never be rattled. Like he has ice water in his veins. (I could see Sims achieving this as well with each win boosting his confidence.)



I would actually say both are probably above average, solid QBs and neither will ever be excellent.
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42567 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:28 am to
I'm pretty sure I've said this before, but I think that Marshall is better in Auburn's offense than Sims would be, and Sims is better in Bama's offense than Marshall would be. Both are very good players overall.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:29 am to
Marshall is the definition of elusive. I'd be surprised if any QB in CFB is able to just weave in and our of traffic on the perimeter like he can. He is ridiculously slippery.
Posted by CrimsonCrusade
Member since Jan 2014
5154 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:31 am to
quote:

would choose Mashall only because he appears to never be rattled. Like he has ice water in his veins. (I could see Sims achieving this as well with each win boosting his confidence.)



Clearly Marshall is as collected in late scenarios as anyone in the game. You're right, Sims looked very rattled against WVU, Ole Miss, and (until the final drive and OT) against LSU. Thankfully he is gaining composure. What impresses me about him is how much he has improved since that horrendous A-Day performance and his ability to prove the naysayers wrong. Pretty much everyone, myself included, thought Coker would be Bama's starter by now. Likewise, Marshall has steadily improved his passing game. Both serviceable quarterbacks who have proven they can get the job done.
Posted by Ashevillain
Member since Sep 2014
203 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:31 am to
I'd say they're both clutch QBs. I think bands would have more than one loss if we still had AjHe's a better QB than Sims, but with this year's OL, he'd lose more.

Marshall reminds me of a faster Tebow, with a less accurate arm. He runs that offense very well, but he's struggled art times because of the inexperience on Auburn's OL.

Overall, I'd say it's pretty much a push. I think Sims could run Auburn's O, but don't think Nick could run Bama's. That doesn't mean Blake is better, but we just aren't suited to be a heavy run ten this season, and prefer a balanced attack more so than Gus.
Posted by artompkins
Orange Beach, Al
Member since May 2010
5615 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:31 am to
Both of these guys are good at what they do and are fine qb's for their systems. Sims is a good passer but he is also throwing to the best WR in the country by a country mile while Marshall is throwing to a bag of butterfingers candy and a drop prone wide out that only runs one route. Neither of these guys will play qb in the nfl but they could play other positions.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260902 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Blake Sims


Auburns best QB is on the bench. I'm worried when he takes over.
Posted by Coach Bobby Williams
Thomas Drew Practice Fields
Member since Jan 2014
303 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:32 am to
Marshall could not run a pro style system where as Sims could run Gus's gimmicks or a pro style which he is doing now.
Posted by BoCam2
Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
3872 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:33 am to
The short and sweet answer: NM is better in GM's offense, while Sims is better in LK's offense.
Posted by CrimsonCrusade
Member since Jan 2014
5154 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:35 am to
quote:

He's a better QB than Sims, but with this year's OL, he'd lose more.


No doubt that Bama would have lost the LSU and Miss State games if you inserted McCarron on the crucial drives. Sims had clutch scrambles in that game that McCarron wouldn't even bother attempting.
Posted by BoCam2
Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
3872 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 11:35 am to
don't be stupid.
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter