Started By
Message
re: Auburn May Add National Championships
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:40 pm to skrayper
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:40 pm to skrayper
quote:
Oklahoma is also undefeated, as USC had to forfeit the game. That's not the same as vacate.
USC vacated that game. There hasn't been any forfeiting since Alabama for the 93 season.
1
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:41 pm to Korin
quote:
Korin
congrats on being obtuse and an idiot. Seriously were you old enough to watch football in 2004/5?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:42 pm to Korin
quote:
There hasn't been any forfeiting since Alabama for the 93 season.
like usual, dont know shite. seriously where do you come up with this stuff sometimes
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:42 pm to NYCAuburn
So y'all didn't beat Virginia Tech by 3 in the 05 Sugar Bowl?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:43 pm to skrayper
quote:Need to do a little more research there skipper.
Oklahoma is also undefeated, as USC had to forfeit the game. That's not the same as vacate.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:43 pm to skrayper
quote:
Oklahoma is also undefeated, as USC had to forfeit the game. That's not the same as vacate.
Nope, it wasn't a forfeit. The game was vacated. Just like all those mid-2000's Bama "wins".
https://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/news/story?id=5272615
quote:
The penalties include the loss of 30 football scholarships over three years and vacating 14 victories in which Bush played from December 2004 through the 2005 season.
So not only does Oklahoma still have a loss that year, its a pretty damned embarrassing loss.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:44 pm to Korin
quote:
So y'all didn't beat Virginia Tech by 3 in the 05 Sugar Bowl?
we did, but you said struggled in the game, I understand you didnt watch it, like you make people assume. Auburn dominated that game
I give you this one, you are great at googling shite and misreading it
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:44 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
congrats on being obtuse and an idiot. Seriously were you old enough to watch football in 2004/5?
Me: The 05 Sugar Bowl when y'all only beat Virginia Tech by 3.
You: You're full of shite.
Me: Provides link.
You: You're stupid.
Incredible logic.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:45 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
we did, but you said struggled in the game, I understand you didnt watch it, like you make people assume. Auburn dominated that game
A 3 point win is domination?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:45 pm to Korin
quote:
A 3 point win is domination?
Sorry, you dont know shite
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:46 pm to NYCAuburn
Why can't you answer a simple question? No reason to get defensive.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:46 pm to Korin
quote:
Me: Provides link.
that you dont know any context and misintrepret. its kind of your MO
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:47 pm to Korin
quote:
Why can't you answer a simple question? No reason to get defensive.
So do you admit to even watching the game?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:54 pm to NYCAuburn
I asked first.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:54 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
this is not
My bad - technically, USC had to vacate the game, not forfeit.
Technically, they're still undefeated.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:55 pm to skrayper
quote:
Technically, they're still undefeated
yes, USC, 11-0 but ineligible
Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:10 pm to SamGinn Cam
jesus will this stupid shite never stop? not you OP - the subject in general.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:13 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
NYCAuburn
Just wondering, are you going to answer my question?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:14 pm to Korin
Dude, you sound like an 8 year old and obviously did notwatch tthe sugar bowl that year.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:17 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Why would anyone have? Not like it was the National Championship game.
Page 23 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News