Started By
Message
re: All y'all (except Florida) should fire your basketball coaches stat ....
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:20 pm to GoldenDawg
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:20 pm to GoldenDawg
Most SEC coaches are safe as long as they maintain .400~.500 record. Look at Auburn.
0
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:23 pm to dkreller
quote:
in a down year of shitty basketball play....congrats?
yeah.....congrats
You missed the point of the whole OP.
Sad.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:24 pm to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
I'm sure the selection committee will agree then.
They finished ahead of you, that's a fact. There's nothing to agree to.
This post was edited on 3/11/14 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:32 pm to Korin
quote:
They finished ahead of you, that's a fact. There's nothing to agree to.
Ah right. So
A) 18-12 (12-6), no shot whatsoever at an NCAA tournament at-large bid.
B) 21-10 (10-8), on the bubble with a good shot at an at large bid
You would rather be in the situation A?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:34 pm to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
quote:
They finished ahead of you, that's a fact. There's nothing to agree to.
Ah right. So
A) 18-12 (12-6), no shot whatsoever at an NCAA tournament at-large bid.
B) 21-10 (10-8), on the bubble with a good shot at an at large bid
You would rather be in the situation A?
Korin doesn't have to worry about such mundane things - Florida fan.
The fact that you are scrambling to somehow gloss over getting passed by a bad Georgia team in conference play is telling, though.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:35 pm to GoldenDawg
Noticed you didn't answer the question. I'm sure this was an oversight.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:36 pm to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
Noticed you didn't answer the question. I'm sure this was an oversight.
What question?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:37 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:
A) 18-12 (12-6), no shot whatsoever at an NCAA tournament at-large bid.
B) 21-10 (10-8), on the bubble with a good shot at an at large bid
You would rather be in the situation A?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:39 pm to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
Ah right. So
A) 18-12 (12-6), with a tiny shot at an NCAA tournament at-large bid. (We're not getting in.)
B) 21-10 (10-8), on the bubble with maybe a shot at an at large bid (You're not getting in.)
You would rather be in the situation A?
FIFY
If neither gets in, then yes I prefer A. No one really cares if you don't make the tournament. Record books will show you finished behind us in the SEC.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:39 pm to GoldenDawg
By the way, what would you consider Georgia's best win this season to be?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:40 pm to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
quote:
A) 18-12 (12-6), no shot whatsoever at an NCAA tournament at-large bid.
B) 21-10 (10-8), on the bubble with a good shot at an at large bid
You would rather be in the situation A?
Didn't realize that was a serious question, but I did answer it. Your question is completely irrelevant to the OP. Completely. You've ignored it mainly because you find it hard to accept.
Georgia ran by you in conference play. How the heck did Arkansas let that happen? That's the question that needs to be answered. And instead of answering it, you try to avoid it with the hope that you can get to the NCAA tourney.
Well, I really hope you do and good luck to ya.
Doesn't really answer my OP, though, does it?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:41 pm to FlatwoodsForester
quote:
(You're not getting in.)
Both CBS and ESPN have us in if the season ended today.This post was edited on 3/11/14 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:44 pm to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
if the season ended today
Most important words in the sentence.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:46 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:
Georgia ran by you in conference play. How the heck did Arkansas let that happen? That's the question that needs to be answered
Pretty simple really
Georgia played South Carolina and Miss State twice (Arkansas played each of those teams once).
Georgia played Kentucky and Florida only once each (Arkansas played Kentucky twice).
Now you see solely using conference record as a metric to judge an entire season on is flawed. You're welcome
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:48 pm to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
Now you see solely using conference record as a metric to judge an entire season on is flawed. You're welcome
So you're happy with Georgia being a 3 seed and Arkansas a 5th seed. That makes perfect sense to you.
That does make me happy indeed. Always good to meet a pig that knows it's place.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:51 pm to GoldenDawg
Please Gamecocks, Don't get rid of Martin. I love dat guy. (No homo)
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:54 pm to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
Pretty simple really
Georgia played South Carolina and Miss State twice (Arkansas played each of those teams once).
Georgia played Kentucky and Florida only once each (Arkansas played Kentucky twice).
Now you see solely using conference record as a metric to judge an entire season on is flawed. You're welcome
Georgia and Arkansas also played Missouri twice. What were the results of those games.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:56 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:
So you're happy with Georgia being a 3 seed and Arkansas a 5th seed.
Sure. I really don't care about conference tournament seeding. Not something I consider a great achievement.
As an Arkansas fan, I have seen some real basketball achievements (pay close attention to the rafters:
Those aren't conference tournament 3 seed banners, by the way.
Maybe Georgia can have one of those made this year. It's looking kind of lonely up there...
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:58 pm to The Sultan of Swine
quote:
quote:
So you're happy with Georgia being a 3 seed and Arkansas a 5th seed.
Sure.
That's all you need to say. Good on ya!
Glad to see you're taking it well, and here's to many more years of Georgia finishing ahead of Arkansas. Don't you change a thing!
Posted on 3/11/14 at 3:59 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:
All y'all (except Florida) should fire your basketball coaches stat
No argument here.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News