Started By
Message
re: Aggies 2012 Football Schedule: Over or Under .500 in the SEC?
Posted on 6/16/12 at 8:30 am to BreakawayZou83
Posted on 6/16/12 at 8:30 am to BreakawayZou83
You seem overly confident Mizzou can come out of College Station with a victory.
Other than obvious homerism, care to elaborate?
Other than obvious homerism, care to elaborate?
Posted on 6/16/12 at 8:40 am to Hugo Stiglitz
The guy's been watching his own ads too long.
Posted on 6/16/12 at 10:03 am to Jon Ham
quote:
Tyler Wilson is going to shite all over A&M just like he did last year. 500 yards passing last season against A&M, except this time they also have to account for one of the best RB's in the nation as well. God A&M is such a joke.
Got damn you mad, son!
Posted on 6/16/12 at 10:33 am to TbirdSpur2010
Ham's been harborong some serious A&M resentment or quite awhile now.
Don't be too tough on him.
Ham, how are ya anyway, bud?
Don't be too tough on him.
Ham, how are ya anyway, bud?
Posted on 6/16/12 at 12:51 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Are we talkin' .500 overall or just .500 in the SEC.
If they finish the season with an overall losing record, they should be traded back to the Big 12 for Texas.
.500 overall, i.e. 6-6. (SEC wins over Ole Miss and Auburn)
This post was edited on 6/16/12 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 6/16/12 at 2:23 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
You seem overly confident Mizzou can come out of College Station with a victory. Other than obvious homerism, care to elaborate?
Maybe the fact that we have beaten them in College Station the last 2 years?
Posted on 6/20/12 at 1:19 pm to Crompdaddy8
Win: Louisiana Tech, SMU, South Carolina State, Ole Miss, Sam Houston State. (5-0)
Neutral: Florida, Arkansas, Auburn, Miss State, Missouri. (2-3)
Loss: LSU & Alabama (0-2)
We can take 2 out of the "neutral" category especially with 3 games at home resulting in a (7-5) record.
Neutral: Florida, Arkansas, Auburn, Miss State, Missouri. (2-3)
Loss: LSU & Alabama (0-2)
We can take 2 out of the "neutral" category especially with 3 games at home resulting in a (7-5) record.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 1:59 pm to svb
Those were both upset victories over a team coached by a guy that became notorious for second-half pants-shitting disasters. I am not saying Missouri comes away with a loss, but you are surely a homer if you ink that as a win.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 2:21 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
September 8th should tell you the direction of your season.
A&M's record in home openers since 1980:
28-4
Posted on 6/20/12 at 2:28 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
...which would indicate that September 8 will NOT tell us the direction of our season?
Posted on 6/20/12 at 3:40 pm to KaiserSoze99
Really, upset victories? We beat you 30-8 in 2010, and the game wasn't as close as the score. It was closer last season, but we still managed over 280 yards rushing. We bring back our stud QB, and you are breaking in a new guy. It sounds like your new QB is just a place holder for more highly touted QBs in the 2012 and 2013 classes. I don't care what Vegas says. A&M beating Mizzou would be the upset.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 4:31 pm to Sarcastro
Last year was a huge upset and don't sit there and act like Missouri was the only school to overcome a huge halftime deficit to win---IN OT. A&M was ahead by double digits at half time. Missouri needed to outscore A&M 14-3 to force overtime in the second half.
In 2010, Missouri won by the largest margin of victory over any other opponent, including LSU. The Missouri game was right before Ryan Tannehill took over at QB. Look at the results after that. You think Missouri wins that game with Tannehill under center?
Again, I am not saying Missouri will lose, but you are a fricking idiot if you think it's a guaranteed win, especially after last year.
In 2010, Missouri won by the largest margin of victory over any other opponent, including LSU. The Missouri game was right before Ryan Tannehill took over at QB. Look at the results after that. You think Missouri wins that game with Tannehill under center?
Again, I am not saying Missouri will lose, but you are a fricking idiot if you think it's a guaranteed win, especially after last year.
This post was edited on 6/20/12 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 6/21/12 at 6:23 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
A&M was ahead by double digits at half time. Missouri needed to outscore A&M 14-3 to force overtime in the second half.
It was 28-17 at the beginning of the 4th quarter.
Posted on 6/21/12 at 6:28 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
It was 28-17 at the beginning of the 4th quarter.
moral victory
Posted on 6/21/12 at 6:35 am to Pigfeet
quote:
moral victory
No, that illustrated that it was even bigger than just another 2nd half collapse.
Posted on 6/21/12 at 6:46 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
a guy that became notorious for second-half pants-shitting disasters
Kinda like Sumlin in all those C-USA championship games.
Posted on 6/21/12 at 8:56 am to CGSC Lobotomy
I have no proof of anything, but there had to be some shite going on. I mean, bad coaching is only so bad. It just doesn't seem possible without some outside influence. Players tanking the game? Third parties intercepting communications? Refs? No one can be that good and turn that bad in a matter of minutes. :conspiracy:
Posted on 6/21/12 at 9:04 am to Stonehog
Tell us stories about your Championship games, Piggie
Posted on 6/21/12 at 9:04 am to sbacino
quote:
Neutral: Florida, Arkansas, Auburn, Miss State, Missouri. (2-3)
Arkansas and Auburn should be in loss category with LSU and Bama. Yall play Auburn at Auburn with a rookie qb. Game over.
Texas A&M couldn't beat Arkansas last year with the overall number 8 draft pick quarterback Ryan Tannehill. Now, yall are going to win with a rookie QB when Arkansas brings back Tyler Wilson. This game will be a blow out just like it was three years ago. Arkansas wins big.
This post was edited on 6/21/12 at 9:05 am
Posted on 6/21/12 at 9:05 am to ctiger69
Showers has a better arm than Tannehill, so it'll be fun to watch.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News