Started By
Message
re: A&M Aggies, explain your 0 football titles
Posted on 1/15/17 at 7:21 pm to Dude man 25
Posted on 1/15/17 at 7:21 pm to Dude man 25
frick ou
Posted on 1/15/17 at 9:00 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
You mean 3 titles?
You are like a flea on a dog's ballsack if you believe that. You have 1...at best...and it was pre-WW2. Go on living your fantasy life bro, and preach the ways of Sumlin while you are at it. Face it, your cult university has a fanbase as bad as the lemmings at Penn State. #farmersfight #nutsqueeze
Posted on 1/15/17 at 9:01 pm to Dude man 25
quote:well that's not true
explain your 0 football titles
Posted on 1/15/17 at 9:59 pm to WestCoastAg
Please enlighten us to which 3 titles you are referring to
Posted on 1/15/17 at 11:52 pm to Dude man 25
You are the idiot coming to an SEC board.
Posted on 1/15/17 at 11:55 pm to SDVTiger
Why don't you post the finished product where it has the words "South Division" under '97 and '10..or would that obliterate your narrative attempt?
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:18 am to red racker
quote:
SWC board
That's an Aggy and Arkansas exclusive board...So frick off back to the Big12 board.
#SWClique
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:22 am to SpeckTigerLure
quote:we have an AP national championship. so the claim that we have 0 titles is false. as mentioned multiple times
Please enlighten us to which 3 titles you are referring to
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 2:23 am
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:28 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
we have an AP national championship
We also have obsessed former rival fans stalking Aggy on a non-big12 message board. That's gotta count for something, right?
I don't know what's more annoying to tRant. Our Aggy trolling skills or our former rivals clogging tRant with Aggy threads .
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:47 am to Texas Weazel
"Former rival"??? Pretty lopsided rivalry..y'all are little bros enemy
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:16 am to Dude man 25
You are the one BEGGING for us to notice you....
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:21 am to Dude man 25
I can't believe that I'm going to be the voice of reason. Let's all be fair and honest about this:
A&M can claim those 3 titles if Alabama can claim 16. Fight me Gumps.
Btw baw, the Big 8/12 is a joke of a conference. Although you do have the Longhorn Network. So that's nice.
A&M can claim those 3 titles if Alabama can claim 16. Fight me Gumps.
Btw baw, the Big 8/12 is a joke of a conference. Although you do have the Longhorn Network. So that's nice.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:21 am to Dude man 25
(Duplicate comment error)
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 9:27 am
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:28 am to CGSC Lobotomy
I was just pointing out that AtM claims 3 natty titles almost 100yrs ago
So OP was kinda incorrect
So OP was kinda incorrect
Posted on 1/16/17 at 9:55 am to Dude man 25
1939 is not debatable, as an 8-3 team has no basis claiming a title belonging to a team that went 11-0.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:02 am to AshleySchaeffer
quote:
A&M can claim those 3 titles if Alabama can claim 16.
Exactly. The SEC has a different standard and we adopted it.
Posted on 1/16/17 at 10:13 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Exactly. The SEC has a different standard and we adopted it.
Here is the aggie paradox: their excuse for not winning a national title in the modern era of football is their roots as a male-only military-oriented institution...BUT...the only seasons the aggies have ever had that matter (the 1 AP title and the 2 retroactive titles claimed) happened as a male-only military-oriented institution.
As A&M's profile has expanded, its resources grew and its student body increased, A&M has done worse, when it should have done better.
Why? Because the more than media has developed and A&M's exposure increased, the more the world has seen what really goes on in College Station. Most elite players want nothing to do with that level of racism and a culture of perverse sexual violence.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News