Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:13 am to Reservoir dawg
quote:
Yeah we scheduled Southern Miss when they were ranked in the top 25
because it happens so often. its still a non bcs conference team and still Southern Miss
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:13 am to jrljr
Auburn plays
San Jose, La Tech, Kansas St, & Samford..
you are really pointing out other schools?
really?
combined went 26-24, without Samford's FCS record of 8-5 it look worse?
San Jose, La Tech, Kansas St, & Samford..
you are really pointing out other schools?
really?
combined went 26-24, without Samford's FCS record of 8-5 it look worse?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:24 am to NYCAuburn
Uh..Southern Miss and MSU used to play every year. Back in the Brett Favre days and before then. Until the last couple of years they could have beaten many BCS teams, especially in other conferences. Your point?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:28 am to jrljr
Bama fans have to get pretty bored from year to year with their schedule. I only watched a couple of Bama games myself all year last year.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:29 am to Reservoir dawg
quote:
Uh..Southern Miss and MSU used to play every year.
youve played So Miss 27 times, just about as much as many of the other SEC schools that played them in the 70's and 80's
quote:
Until the last couple of years they could have beaten many BCS teams, especially in other conferences
quote:
Your point?
They are a perennial weak team from a weak conference. Dont try to act like the are some elite team
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:29 am to 3rddownonthe8
Yeah, but then look at AUs sec schedule. One of the toughest in the league just like always son.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:37 am to NYCAuburn
They are from a weak league, however before falling into obscurity they were as good as many BCS teams in the land, making them a solid ooc opponent.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 12:05 pm to jrljr
both florida and bama aren't too bad with west Virginia and FSU respectively but A&M SHOULD BE ASHAMED. this is only the 3rd year I have known the aggies non conference games but they have (or will play) 100% pussies in that time frame; 12 lousy games. vanderbuilt, msu , Kentucky I can understand but the aggies are PATHETIC. I really suffer from post cognitive dissonance regarding letting them in the SEC. first we actually lose money by letting them in and now they won't play anybody.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 12:21 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Bama fans have to get pretty bored from year to year with their schedule. I only watched a couple of Bama games myself all year last year.
I only want to see one more BCS level matchup each year.
Basically a tier system in OOC scheduling. One major program, one from a lower BCS league. Then your normal Sun Belt, C-USA, etc for the remainder.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:02 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
first we actually lose money by letting them in and now they won't play anybody.
you can't be this stupid, can you? Old...I'm sure...ignorant...probably..........but just plain stupid.........apparently.
An Aggie must have pulled one over on you something good...
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:03 pm to jrljr
I can understand Vandy and State to some extent but Bama, A&M and Florida need to step it up.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:04 pm to partsman103
quote:
USM for playing a Heavy Weight.
You're basically paying them a million to be a sacrificial lamb. And if you don't make it as painful as possible for them, I'll be mad.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:07 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Florida need to step it up.
What is wrong with our schedule? What is the difference between the UF OOC schedule and Auburn or LSU?
This post was edited on 4/14/14 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:08 pm to jrljr
....and FWIW both Rice and SMU went to bowls last year. Not saying that is somehting to hang your hat on, but we could have scheduled 2 others that didn't...
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:09 pm to bgator85
FSU is a permanent rival so that's not really y'all going out and looking for a touch OOC opponent. Schedule someone like Oklahoma, USC or Texas.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:11 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
FSU is a permanent rival so that's not really y'all going out and looking for a touch OOC opponent. Schedule someone like Oklahoma, USC or Texas.
Easy for you to say, that would be suicide. Curious, how many SEC schools do you think schedule more than one BCS opponent on a regular basis?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:12 pm to bgator85
quote:
What is wrong with our schedule? What is the difference between the UF OOC schedule and Auburn or LSU?
Not much at all. Most SEC teams follow the same format most years - one OOC that could be legit (of course that is subject to change since these schedules are done a few years in advance) and three teams (usually non-BCS or tradition BCS conference bottom dwellers) that should be 21+ underdogs.
This post was edited on 4/14/14 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:12 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:Why should they do that? They're already playing LSU/UGA/SoCarl/Bama/FSU, why the hell add to that?
FSU is a permanent rival so that's not really y'all going out and looking for a touch OOC opponent. Schedule someone like Oklahoma, USC or Texas.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:13 pm to aggiegreg93
quote:
I can understand Vandy and State to some extent but Bama, A&M and Florida need to step it up
A&M added Arizona State for 15 & 16....UCLA in 16 & 17. This shite doesn't happen over night, bud. We had a 10 year deal with Arky before realignment. That was one OOC game that became an in conference game....but it's easy I guess for you to pop off without intelligence.
This post was edited on 4/14/14 at 1:17 pm
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News