Started By
Message
re: #22 SC vs Clemson #shootyhoops official thread FINAL 62-60 CU (damnit Thornwell)
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:21 pm to SCLibertarian
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:21 pm to SCLibertarian
Well that and Notice playing like a 14 year old Jewish rec league player
2
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:22 pm to CNB
What a sorry time to be a Gamecock fan. God I hate Clemson.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:22 pm to CNB
Get shite on m8
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:23 pm to TigerTalker16
I get it man. You have nothing to cheer for so you have to rely on cheap trolling tactics anytime the opportunity presents itself because your sports program is garbage.
It's all good. Let it out
It's all good. Let it out
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:25 pm to CNB
Garbage rn but not 4 long. I'm also very intoxicated.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:27 pm to CNB
At least Thornwell being out gives South Carolina fans an excuse later in the season as to why they lost these games
When he's back I can only imagine how many "undefeated with Thornwell" threads there will be
When he's back I can only imagine how many "undefeated with Thornwell" threads there will be
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:27 pm to CNB
God the last 2 minutes was awful. Couldn't drive at all and just lobed up 3s
This post was edited on 12/21/16 at 10:29 pm
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:28 pm to GatorsGators
Can't wait. Because we would be undefeated right now if we had him.
It's not a good look for our team that we can't make up for the loss of Thornwell in these games, but the writing is on the wall.
It's not a good look for our team that we can't make up for the loss of Thornwell in these games, but the writing is on the wall.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:31 pm to CNB
You know, maybe if Ray Tanner would actually have just a little more transparency on this issue (a reason or length of suspension), I wouldn't be as bothered by it. But Thornwell is going to have at least a one month suspension that will probably knock us to the NIt, and we will never know why.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:36 pm to CNB
quote:Sure, but this isn't an injury, it's a suspension. The committee shouldn't discount these games because Thornwell fricked up.
Can't wait. Because we would be undefeated right now if we had him.
It's not a good look for our team that we can't make up for the loss of Thornwell in these games, but the writing is on the wall.
And Syracuse continues to look awful. Got blown out by St John's by 33 at home. That's not a quality win.
There's a good chance that this team is on the bubble again. That Memphis game is pretty important.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:39 pm to GetCocky11
quote:You know that people are going to be throwing the "record with Thornwell" stat around trying to discount these two losses as a reason South Carolina should get in on Selection Sunday, even if it's unfair (which I think it is)
You know, maybe if Ray Tanner would actually have just a little more transparency on this issue (a reason or length of suspension), I wouldn't be as bothered by it. But Thornwell is going to have at least a one month suspension that will probably knock us to the NIt, and we will never know why.
Even still, there's no reason that this team shouldn't go 11-7 and make the tourney. The SOS is tougher than last year obviously, so that won't keep them out this year.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:57 pm to GatorsGators
big win for CU b/c the ACC schedule is brutal this year.
Thornwell playing doesn't mean SC automatically wins. Dozier probably doesn't get 26 points , etc.
Thornwell playing doesn't mean SC automatically wins. Dozier probably doesn't get 26 points , etc.
This post was edited on 12/21/16 at 10:59 pm
Posted on 12/21/16 at 10:59 pm to Tillman
we wreck with Thornwell. Posted on 12/21/16 at 11:03 pm to CNB
looking at the stats, that doesn't seem true. you had no scoring off the bench, Clemson had 29 from bench players.
DeVoe for Clemson missed 5 FTs, 1 of 6. and CU usually shoots better than 18 percent from 3. stat wise it wasn't a good game for CU. 15 turnovers on the road gets u beat most of th etime.
DeVoe for Clemson missed 5 FTs, 1 of 6. and CU usually shoots better than 18 percent from 3. stat wise it wasn't a good game for CU. 15 turnovers on the road gets u beat most of th etime.
This post was edited on 12/21/16 at 11:06 pm
Posted on 12/21/16 at 11:07 pm to Tillman
sometimes I legitimately think you're retarded
Posted on 12/21/16 at 11:08 pm to CNB
didn't thornwell play last year, it was a competitive game, and the SC was better overall.
other than Michigan, Clemson and I guess Syracuse, SC hasn't played anybody.
other than Michigan, Clemson and I guess Syracuse, SC hasn't played anybody.
This post was edited on 12/21/16 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 12/21/16 at 11:20 pm to Tillman
quote:
other than Michigan, Clemson and I guess Syracuse, SC hasn't played anybody.
This statement is just dumb.
Thats a typical OOC schedule for any CBB team these days.
It's certainly better than Cockys OOC schedule a year ago.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 11:31 pm to boXerrumble
Clemson has played Davidson, Okla, Nebraska, Xavier, Alabaam, UGA, and SC. that is the prequel to a brutal ACC schedule.
This post was edited on 12/21/16 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 12/21/16 at 11:43 pm to Tillman
quote:there are two tournament teams in there. congrats
Davidson, Okla, Nebraska, Xavier, Alabaam, UGA, and SC.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 12:43 am to WestCoastAg
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News