Started By
Message

re: ? about Bama's vacated wins

Posted on 6/9/11 at 9:26 pm to
Posted by AuburnCPA
Member since May 2008
18821 posts
Posted on 6/9/11 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

CPA! Is that really you!?!?!?


does a one legged duck swim in a circle?
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37258 posts
Posted on 6/9/11 at 9:47 pm to
I like diddy better. Log out and let him log in.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164336 posts
Posted on 6/9/11 at 10:05 pm to
Alabama didn't have to worry about vacating any wins against LSU in 05, 06, or 07.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72248 posts
Posted on 6/9/11 at 10:06 pm to
Riveting information there chap.
Posted by jatebe
Queen of Links
Member since Oct 2008
18284 posts
Posted on 6/10/11 at 12:17 am to
quote:

Alabama didn't have to worry about vacating any wins against LSU in 05, 06, or 07.

The main teams to benefit from our vacated/forfeited wins were Arkansas, Ole Miss and Vandy. They each had an extra win given to them and Bama had to take 3 wins away.

Tenn, S. Car, & Miss St all had an extra win given to them and Bama had to take 2 wins away. Bama had to take 2 wins away against Florida.

The rest of the SEC teams didn't benefit - LSU, Kentucky, Georgia, and Auburn.
Posted by Joe Blow
Member since Nov 2007
2631 posts
Posted on 6/10/11 at 9:05 am to
quote:

The main teams to benefit from our vacated/forfeited wins were Arkansas, Ole Miss and Vandy. They each had an extra win given to them and Bama had to take 3 wins away.


Not true. That's the difference between vacated and forfeited. Bama's wins were vacated, so they still show as losses for the other teams.
Posted by AuburnCPA
Member since May 2008
18821 posts
Posted on 6/10/11 at 9:07 am to
quote:

I like diddy better. Log out and let him log in.


is there anyway to prove that his arse ain't me?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 6/10/11 at 9:58 am to
quote:

is there anyway to prove that his arse ain't me?
Thats like asking WMFC to not be WMFC
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 6/10/11 at 10:01 am to
Yall had the exact same posting style,avatar and Sig images,you can't kid a kidder....
Posted by jatebe
Queen of Links
Member since Oct 2008
18284 posts
Posted on 6/10/11 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Joe Blow
quote:

Not true. That's the difference between vacated and forfeited. Bama's wins were vacated, so they still show as losses for the other teams.
I know the difference. The OP asked about our vacates (21 wins in 2005-07) and our forfeits (9 wins in 1993).

Tis true. In 1993 our wins were forfeited, which means Bama's wins turned to losses and the teams that originally lost to us, got a free win.

Posted by jatebe
Queen of Links
Member since Oct 2008
18284 posts
Posted on 6/10/11 at 10:58 am to
Proof, here is Alabama's 1990-94 records. Notice 1993, all our wins were forfeited. It shows a loss for Tulane, Vandy, Arkansas, La Tech, South Carolina, Ole Miss, Southern Miss, Miss State, and tied Tennessee even though Alabama won those games on the field. But the NCAA took our wins away and gave them to the losers.

Here is Arkansas's 1990-94 records. The score for the Alabama game is Arkansas 3, Alabama 43. But Arkansas has a big "W" for that game even though they lost on the field.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter