Started By
Message

re: Your opinion on Milo Yiannopoulos being banned from twitter?

Posted on 7/20/16 at 6:30 pm to
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37472 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 6:30 pm to
Where are you skimming his tweets? His Twitter is non existent right now
Posted by Cobrasize
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2013
49680 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 7:04 pm to
She's talking about this creep
LINK
Posted by DanMullins4Life
Member since Oct 2012
3168 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 7:07 pm to
Twitter's CEO is still bitter over Milo's rejection.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

Damn..I just skimmed more of his tweets. That dude is one sick frick. He should be on a psychopath watch list.

He seriously gives me the creeps...He is extremely disturbing in his ramblings.



Milo is the answer to the out of control PC culture. I don't entirely agree with Milo (I'm going with Gary Johnson), but he's being a champion for free speech. The left doesn't know what to do with Milo other than to call him racist, and he's not having any of that. Milo's presence is a good thing, since the SJWs need to be called on their bullshite.

Free speech is disappearing before our eyes and the media isn't even trying to hide that they're now censoring it. Seriously google "Hillary Clinton L" and see what the suggestions pop up. Then "Hillary Clinton Lia" and it's just Hillary Clinton Liabilities. Look at the hastags they are censoring. That's bullshite and Google and Twitter can no longer say that they're protectors of free thought and speech.

EDIT: Nevermind. Thought you were referring to Milo. Yes, that guy is clearly fricked in the head.
This post was edited on 7/20/16 at 7:28 pm
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Milo is the answer to the out of control PC culture. I don't entirely agree with Milo (I'm going with Gary Johnson), but he's being a champion for free speech. The left doesn't know what to do with Milo other than to call him racist, and he's not having any of that. Milo's presence is a good thing, since the SJWs need to be called on their bullshite.




I really like how uncomfortable he makes democrats.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20480 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

He is extremely disturbing in his ramblings.




It's quite a read. How is that guy not banned?
Posted by Pigfeet
Ark Mods are Fascists
Member since Mar 2010
19783 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

frick twitter


and facebook, too


Milo and team are working on a new social media platform
Posted by FleshEatingSalsa
Floating down the Anduin
Member since Dec 2009
12293 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 8:06 pm to
Relevant to the topic at hand.

Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:07 pm to
twitter should never ban anyone
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:13 pm to
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49234 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 10:09 pm to
It's pretty funny how one of Trump's most outspoken and well known supporters is a flamboyant gay dude
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28825 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 10:15 pm to
twitter is a private company that deserves to do what they will with their business. i support that.

but they're also a piece of shite that allows death threats to cops or conservatives and ISIS to do as they will.

eff them.

belle, i love you deeply but you are 100% wrong. they let tons of hate speech go on. they can say "we shut down hate speech," but i can link to 100s of tweets that say otherwise.
This post was edited on 7/20/16 at 10:18 pm
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40856 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

pro ISIS accounts


Yeah maybe Twitter should get their priorities straight. Let's continue to let ISIS use the platform to spread their message but ban the conservative because you don't like his political leanings.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 7:26 am to
I don't follow him and can't recall ever seeing any of his tweets in my timeline, so really couldn't care less.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118943 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 7:49 am to
Is that the same lady in the All State commercials now? I'm boycotting a female casted Ghostbusters.
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3319 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 8:35 am to
Correct, it's technically not a private company. I think when people say that, they mean it's in the private sector and not funded or run by a government. In which case, since each share is private property to its owner, the company reserves the right to refuse service to users-- especially if they violate the user agreement. I think it's a dumb reason to ban someone, but I also think companies and businesses should be able to refuse service to anyone for any reason.
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 10:39 am to
Hey these are mean streets up in the twitterverse.
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 10:40 am to
That is pretty funny one has to admit..
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13163 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Your opinion on Milo Yiannopoulos being banned from twitter?


Like most liberal progressive owned and operated companies, they use their power to further their political agenda. Obama set a precedent of doing this throughout his administration so they're just following the lead of our distinguished President.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24947 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Correct, it's technically not a private company. I think when people say that, they mean it's in the private sector and not funded or run by a government. In which case, since each share is private property to its owner, the company reserves the right to refuse service to users-- especially if they violate the user agreement. I think it's a dumb reason to ban someone, but I also think companies and businesses should be able to refuse service to anyone for any reason.




I agree, I was thinking about it with my broker hat.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter