Started By
Message

re: Shooting in Garland, Tx at Muhammad Art exhibit

Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:28 am to
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33330 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:28 am to
Why do you think that?
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33330 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Lawd. You intimated clearly that understanding their ideas on the "doodles" was important. Then when faced with your own hypocrisy, you pretend that you don't care at all what they believe.


It's important to understand their ideas on the doodles if you don't want to get shot. That doesn't mean I care about what they believe.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36509 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:34 am to
What you said:

quote:

Everyone knows that Muslims kill over drawings of Mohammed.

That would be like a woman going to a Rape-aholics Anonymous meeting with a T-shirt that says "Rape me," and then questioning why she got raped for what she was wearing.


Not comparable to what happened in Garland. Now, it would be comparable if the art show were held in a mosque, or if your hypothetical was a woman wearing said shirt in a public place and being raped.

If I say something critical of Mohammed in a public place, I should not expect to be brutally murdered. We live in a nation of laws and rights, one of which is free speech. Yes, you can sometimes expect negative consequences for exercising your 1st Amendment rights, but murder is, in fact, illegal in this country.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36509 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:36 am to
quote:

It's important to understand their ideas on the doodles if you don't want to get shot.


No, it's important for them to understand that they cannot murder people who disagree with them if they live in a non-shitty country.

It is not, never has been, and never will be my responsibility to not offend muslims. It is, always has been, and always will be their responsibility to grow the frick up and deal with it like civilized people do. If they want to keep their own countries in a medieval state of shite, that's their call, but not in this country.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33330 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:36 am to
quote:

If I say something critical of Mohammed in a public place, I should not expect to be brutally murdered.


Do you have that expectation now?
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36509 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Do you have that expectation now?


Yes, I'm an American. Also, I shoot back.

The best artwork there were the chalk outlines.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33330 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:39 am to
So right now, if you say something critical of Mohammed in public you think you'll be brutally murdered?
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36509 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:41 am to
I misread.

No, I do not have that expectation.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33330 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:51 am to
quote:

the808bass


Here's an olive branch.

Posted by Herman Frisco
Bon Secour
Member since Sep 2008
17267 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 9:56 am to
Read the Bill of Rights. If you don't agree with them you should gtfo.
The reason IsIs or the Black Panthers will not win the war is that there are too many redneck deer hunters in the USA. Don't belive me? Let the shite start.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Everyone knows that Muslims kill over drawings of Mohammed.

That would be like a woman going to a Rape-aholics Anonymous meeting with a T-shirt that says "Rape me," and then questioning why she got raped for what she was wearing.



Wow
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Everyone knows that Muslims kill over drawings of Mohammed.

That would be like a woman going to a Rape-aholics Anonymous meeting with a T-shirt that says "Rape me," and then questioning why she got raped for what she was wearing.


I am truly flabbergasted right now.
Posted by Dawg in Beaumont
Athens
Member since Jan 2012
4494 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 11:55 am to
At this point Stonehog is best read as simply performance art. He is a satire of a satire of a satire of a cliched leftist.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

We live in a nation of laws and rights, one of which is free speech.


Exactly. We tolerate some morbid shite in this country. From the filthy "art" of Robert Mapplethorpe to the obscene "speech" of the Westboro Baptist Church.

What keeps us from obliterating shitheads like them is our respect for the Constitution and its guarantee of their, and our, right to be obnoxious. It's difficult to process sometimes but we have sent millions of soldiers to their deaths in defense of that right.

We expect, no, we demand that the right to free speech is fundamental. It is not reasonable that a religion expects everyone, even those who do not follow its doctrines, to yield this right. We never have and we won't now.

Islam's followers must respect this fundamental right of Americans and other nationalities who accept it. They can insist on adherence to their religious law that an image of Muhammad is blasphemy for their congregations but that's the boundary. If they cross that boundary they will meet resistance. That should be glaringly obvious to them by now.
Posted by dead money
kyle, tx
Member since Feb 2014
1391 posts
Posted on 5/5/15 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Islam's followers must respect this fundamental right of Americans and other nationalities who accept it. They can insist on adherence to their religious law that an image of Muhammad is blasphemy for their congregations but that's the boundary. If they cross that boundary they will meet resistance. That should be glaringly obvious to them by now



Exactly. We admire and respect ones choosing for their religion of choice--like it or not. But adamant, stubborn or not, despite what their faith preaches, religious law doesn't trump the constitution. They can whine like fricking spoiled babies about the "art show" all they want but crossing that line to resort to extreme violence is, was going to be met with a conclusion we are reading about today.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter