Started By
Message

re: Murder victims by weapon

Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:01 pm to
Posted by PintobeansnCornbread
Member since Jan 2014
319 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:01 pm to
I wonder where blowing hot pepper up someones nose while they sleep qualifies?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:03 pm to
quote:


Actually a better way to put this is if my daughter needs to be with someone armed to go anywhere or to be at school that seems like a third world country


So... Aurora, Colorado, Vienna, Virginia and Newtown, Connecticut are third world?
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:05 pm to
That is not my point and you know it. Should I just type it again?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:21 pm to
The point is irrelevant. People react violently in all walks of life, being prepared to defend ones self doesnt put one on the level of a third world citizen or relegate their area of living a third world area.
Posted by finestfirst79
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Member since Nov 2012
11646 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

That is not my point and you know it. Should I just type it again?


Hmm... I can't imagine how a rewording would change the logical response. But do try

Actually I haven't taken a gun out of my home in 25 years or more, and that was only to go hunting. But I'm glad there are good people out there with CCW licenses. Ignoring (for a moment) the kooks-with-guns argument of the left for banning guns I don't see why anybody would have an objection to this, other than some touchy feely "I don't like it" thing. To my knowledge there has never been a CCW-carrier convicted of a violent crime. Not one.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:25 pm to
Eh, something about putting on a raid vest always ends up with me feeling like I'm in Mogadishu.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:29 pm to
Is it the act of putting it on or the reason and target of the raid? And would it feel the same regardless of location if the perp was the same, no matter the locatin?
Posted by finestfirst79
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Member since Nov 2012
11646 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

Aren't gun crimes at record low rates overall?


Yeah, that was kinda the point. The crisis ain't a crisis. But I have no objection to this thread blowing up and the loons coming out telling us why we should be disarmed.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

The point is irrelevant.
So I should be happy if my daughter plays at school under the protectorship of armed guards.

and it's not irrelevant to me.
This post was edited on 6/5/14 at 8:45 pm
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13894 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

So I should be happy if my daughter plays at school under the protectorship of armed guards.



Well, yeah.

The guards aren't the problem, the people they're protecting her from are the problem.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:49 pm to
USA
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:50 pm to
Location is the biggest factor.
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13894 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

USA



Guns are never going to be illegal here. It's not going to happen, ever.

The real way to address the issue is to arm more people and not allow guns to have the overwhelming power they have in most crime.

Will that amount to more gang shootouts instead of just random drive bys and random killings? Probably.

Will it decrease property crime and random street violence? I'd guess yes.

It seems that doing it the way it's been done isn't working. Chicago is a great city, and guns are nary to be found in the city. Gangsters find guns and shoot each other. Shocker.

Would the non-gang/crime related violence go down with a more armed populace? I would almost guarantee my life on it.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111521 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

Would the non-gang/crime related violence go down with a more armed populace? I would almost guarantee my life on it.

Even if it didn't go down, it seems antithetical to the idea of freedom to not allow people to defend themselves.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 9:19 pm to
All the arguments for/against aside, I look around and see how we live. Cops are getting more militarized as they probably should if everybody's armed, schools are under armed guard (and this is the NRA's position). I've been to countries like this but now I'm going to live in one. That's reality, and it's also not relevant.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 9:26 pm to
Its becoming a militant state because the underlying issues are ignored in favor of trying to strip individual rights.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111521 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Cops are getting more militarized as they probably should if everybody's armed, schools are under armed guard (and this is the NRA's position).


Cops aren't getting militarized as a response to CCW. That started before. Linking those two doesn't seem to be accurate.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 10:05 pm to
I didn't link it to CCW, I'm just pointing out ever increasing levels of firepower.

And I agree with Alahunter that it's an effect, not a cause.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 10:27 pm to
Its all the Homeland Security money. Its use it or lose it, so everyone buys the craziest shite they can. Does Des Moines, Iowa need an APC? No. Do they have one thanks to Homeland grants. Probably.
This post was edited on 6/5/14 at 10:33 pm
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 10:29 pm to
Yep. If funds arent used, then the next yr, they dont get as much. So in fear of not getting future funding, its spent on unnecessary programs and equipment.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter