Started By
Message
re: Last gun shop in San Fran closes up
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:31 pm to Patton
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:31 pm to Patton
I do wonder whats so oppressive about a list that's already required to be maintained by the dealer being made available to law enforcement. But hey, we gotta be up in arms over something right
3
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:32 pm to Patton
Google Oakland CA gun stores and look at the map. SF is literally encircled by gun stores all over the Bay Area. Pretty sure there is a demand for firearms.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:32 pm to Tropic Lightning
You can infer, or continue to miss the simple point that rights would not be stripped, just made more cumbersome.
This post was edited on 9/24/15 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:33 pm to Russvegas Dan
It's none of the governments business, back building cases, right to privacy, freedom of association....
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:35 pm to Tropic Lightning
Great. Your initial post claimed the lack of gun stores was evidence of the infringing of rights. That's an inncorrect statement. I challenged you on it and you brought up judges. I asked what judges had to do with my previous post and you started talking
about court cases from around the country and called me a liberal based off like three post of mine. This has been our interaction thus far.
about court cases from around the country and called me a liberal based off like three post of mine. This has been our interaction thus far.
This post was edited on 9/24/15 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:35 pm to Russvegas Dan
quote:
I do wonder whats so oppressive about a list that's already required to be maintained by the dealer being made available to law enforcement. But hey, we gotta be up in arms over something right
I'm sure you equally wouldn't mind a Gov't list of people who have certain views. Or that volunteer politically. I mean, heck.. it's not like the Gov't could ever use any kind of list of individuals to strip them of things later on. That sort of thing has NEVER happened in the history of mankind, has it?
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:35 pm to Montezuma
quote:
You can infer, or continue to miss the simple point that rights would not be stripped, just made more cumbersome. But i doubt you do either.
Let me give some help here, Marines usually need lots of help, Federal Judges agree with me and are putting their heel to laws like this as many posters above have cited and reaffirmed.
It's very typical of a Marine to be a Statist drone.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:37 pm to Patton
YOU frickING IDIOT JUDGES HAVE USED THE LACK OF GUN STORES IN MUNICIPALITIES IN IL , MD, DC AS EXAMPLE OF CITIZENS GUN RIGHTS BEING RESTRICTED.
This post was edited on 9/24/15 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:39 pm to CatFan81
quote:
But I'm not wrong, and you goddamned well know it.
You are always wrong, my dear Cat
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:40 pm to Tropic Lightning
quote:
YOU frickING IDIOT JUDGES HAVE USED THE LACK OF GUN STORES IN MUNICIOALITIES IN IL , MD, DC AS EXAMPLE OF CITIZENS GUN RIGHTS BEING RESTRICTED.
this is upsurd. Calm down nancy. There are no gun stores in my hometown, are the citizens rights there being infringed? Also can you link and maybe copy and paste the judges words where they said the lack of gun stores in a certain location is in and of itself clear evidence of the infringement of rights. Maybe call me a liberal again because you are a beast at spotting my political views based off less than 10 posts in this thread.
This post was edited on 9/24/15 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:44 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
You are always wrong, my dear Cat
You can lick my big salty balls.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:45 pm to Tropic Lightning
So are you still insisting San Franciscans would not be able to possess weapons? Yes or no? That is what has been repeated, and just want to clarify if you are in that group.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:46 pm to Tropic Lightning
Your not being forced to give any information to the government. Only if you want to buy a gun.
Also if you want to drive a car. But whatever.
Also if you want to drive a car. But whatever.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:55 pm to Alahunter
If these are the regulations San Francisco residents want I have no problem with it.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:56 pm to Alahunter
quote:
it's not like the Gov't could ever use any kind of list of individuals to strip them of things later on. That sort of thing has NEVER happened in the history of mankind, has it?
I see. You don't like people loading up on things they can use to harm you.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 10:22 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
As is modern-day conservatism
Posted on 9/24/15 at 10:25 pm to Russvegas Dan
quote:
I do wonder whats so oppressive about a list that's already required to be maintained by the dealer being made available to law enforcement. But hey, we gotta be up in arms over something right
People bitch if there's little gun control, or too much gun control. Bottom line, people bitch
I tend to like liberty, but I understand it's not real popular these days.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 11:11 pm to Alahunter
This whole thread be like
Posted on 9/25/15 at 4:55 am to Alahunter
quote:
Same effect, when they require citizens to abide to an unlawful registry of their firearms. Submit to illegal records of their ownership or don't buy.
I don't agree with this law but this is the dumbest argument in the entire thread. For over 20 years the federal government has required a picture ID and registration from every licensed dealer in the country for every firearm transaction.
WTF are you babbling about?
Posted on 9/25/15 at 5:55 am to CatFan81
quote:
4 years in the Army
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News