Started By
Message

re: Judge rules against opponents of removing Confederate memorials ...

Posted on 2/5/16 at 6:58 pm to
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

The fact remains that those who fought for the Confederacy fought for a vile cause.


Anyone who doesn't know that the awful Civil War was centered on the issue of slavery is being mindfully ignorant. I can't recall a conflict within another nation that was caused by the principle that freedom is for all citizens.

It may sound weird but I'm glad for the war. It has resounded through the 151 years of history since it ended.

America's role as the leader of democratic nations was cemented by the Civil War, not the Revolution of 1776 or either of the World Wars. We showed the world that we would not back down from our pledge to offer equal opportunity to everyone and that there would be no one excluded from the human rights and dignity afforded by our Constitution.

Long live America, the land of equal opportunity.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19119 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

I'm waiting for W&L to become W again. Wonder if they'll try to remove the Chapel.


Let them try.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

America's role as the leader of democratic nations was cemented by the Civil War, not the Revolution of 1776 or either of the World Wars. We showed the world that we would not back down from our pledge to offer equal opportunity to everyone and that there would be no one excluded from the human rights and dignity afforded by our Constitution.


This is as much revisionist history as the notion that the south did not secede over slavery.

The north did not go to war in a crusade to end slavery. They went to war to preserve the union and, more directly, because the south started shooting at them. Slavery ended in the south three years before it ended in the north.

Seventy five years after that war ended, another war began and immediately saw over a hundred thousand American citizens stripped of their property, their dignity, their constitutional rights, and their freedom based SOLELY on their ancestry.

The civil war served to hasten the end of an utterly vile and evil institution, but the rest of what you said is utter nonsense and completely disproven by historical fact.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37599 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Anyone who doesn't know that the awful Civil War was centered on the issue of slavery is being mindfully ignorant. I can't recall a conflict within another nation that was caused by the principle that freedom is for all citizens.

It may sound weird but I'm glad for the war. It has resounded through the 151 years of history since it ended.

America's role as the leader of democratic nations was cemented by the Civil War, not the Revolution of 1776 or either of the World Wars. We showed the world that we would not back down from our pledge to offer equal opportunity to everyone and that there would be no one excluded from the human rights and dignity afforded by our Constitution.

Long live America, the land of equal opportunity.


Kentucky allowed the removal of the Jefferson Davis statue correct?

And all Confederate memorials are under attack, all across the South.

So it'll be okay when they decide to bulldoze the Confederate cemeteries too huh? Because there are already proposals for that to happen in one place.

I mean it's not like all the Muslim statues going up, silently across the country ... it's not like this is anything comparable to what ISIS is doing to the history of Syria right now, is it? Tearing down old Christian monuments because, well, they don't like them ... they find them offensive to Allah and all.

I read what some of you people in this thread are typing ... and it's disgusting. You just don't get it.

It's pathetic.

You cannot white wash a history of a region, or a country, just because you find certain past aspects of it offensive. It's just not done in civilized countries.

This is 2016. This is not the same America that it was 150-450 years ago. But people in this region should still be allowed to retain some semblance of their culture and tradition, retain their honor. Many a Southerner fought in other wars for this country.

So is it time to remove statues of Harry S. Truman ... because he is offensive to the Japanese? Or FDR for that matter, because he interned so many Japanese Americans?

This is a slippery slope and I had hoped we could have an adult, intelligent, conversation about the subject on this forum ... but I should have known better. Too many millennial pussies around here ... too much playing the race card. It makes anything resembling an adult conversation impossible.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:09 pm to
I guess cheering for a loser goes right along with you being a Suck Carolina fan.

Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

the rest of what you said is utter nonsense and completely disproven by historical fact


That the United States became the leader of the world is hardly nonsense. When it began may be opinion but fighting a civil war to end slavery helped make this country more powerful and willful than any other.

From Lincoln's second inaugural address:

quote:

One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union, even by war
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139838 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:22 pm to
What was his legal basis to uphold the ruling?

Was the appeal based on historical markers?
This post was edited on 2/5/16 at 8:24 pm
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

I'm not leaving ...
You old. You leaving
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37599 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

I'm not playing any card at all.

YOU are the one who brought up race itt first.


No, actually ... you called me a racist because I said it was time to get over that shite. Here's a quote, from you ...

quote:

TbirdSpur2010

This racism is pure and it is beautiful


I'm Scotch-Irish ... we got over the bullshite long ago. Could give a frick even.

Most of the fricktards millennials in this thread didn't even have family here until after the War of Northern Aggression ... much later actually.

And I wanna be open here. I'm not racist, but I am the least white guilt cracker in the room ... I can promise you that. I have zero guilt about anything done before I was born. My Dad's side came into this country through Charleston in 1706. My wife's side came into Charleston in 1669 and is one of the oldest family names in the state although her father was serving in post WWII Italy when he met her mother and she was eventually born there and raised there much of her life ... she's still a South Carolinian.

All of the men in my family have served in every war this country has known ... every war, proudly. My people never owned slaves, not in my lineage anyways although some uncles and cousins in Georgia, Mississippi and Tennessee did ... but we didn't. Most in my family fought for States' Rights ... and we've got the journals to prove it.

Most Southerners felt the same way. Only the big plantation owners wanted the slavery.

But allow me to present you with a paradoxical question if I may Tbird.

Let's say I had a time machine and you and I could hold hands and sing kumbaya and go back to 1581 St Augustine, FL, where the first slaves were brought into this country ... let's say we go back to 1580 or 79 or whatever. YOu can change things ... what would you change? You have the power, with the snap of your fingers, to change it ... what would you change?
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

I'm Scotch-Irish
That's pretty close to a cockapoo correct?
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37599 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

That the United States became the leader of the world is hardly nonsense. When it began may be opinion but fighting a civil war to end slavery helped make this country more powerful and willful than any other.

From Lincoln's second inaugural address:


It was the beginning of the end of this country as a world leader, the world power, the center of democracy. It's only a matter of time now. Once states' rights were taken away ... it has all led to this and, in all honesty and in the overall history of civilization ... we didn't last very long. What, a couple of hundred years maybe, at best?

This country is in a mess right now. Social welfare systems are overloaded and bankrupt. Illegal immigration is rampant. Fiat currency rules to the point where the middle class is being eviscerated, decimated, destroyed. Christianity is under siege. A socialist, really a communist, is garnering all the brainwashed white guilt millennial vote ... which is the most pathetic thing of all and is illustrated in this thread.

And now ... we're one step short of book burning. We're doing EXACTLY what the religious fanatics in Syria and Lybia are doing ... we're destroying old monuments that do not fit their narrative ... that they find, lulz, "offensive."

Next will come the book burnings. The the gulags.

Soon the Fed, with the blessings of the Federal government, will abolish currency and everything will be done electronically ... so that if you piss them off they can empty your bank account and take everything you have without having any rhyme or reason whatsoever - and the sheople people will duck their heads and look away in fear.

It all started with the Civil War.

Slaves were going to be freed ... it was already happening in the South. Modern machinery was taking over - there was no more need for it. Southerners were pissed that they were being taxed to death to build canals in New York and Federal Buildings in DC ... 7x the amount northern businesses were being taxed. For that matter Southern product had to go through northern ports and be taxed before being sent to England.

I could go on and on.



Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

I could go on and on.

please don't.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Kentucky allowed the removal of the Jefferson Davis statue correct?


Not yet but the process is under way. Plans are to move the statue to a museum about Kentucky's participation in the war. It certainly doesn't belong in the Capital Rotunda in Frankfort.

quote:

And all Confederate memorials are under attack, all across the South.


They have their place in museums but not in public places. The sentiments of these memorials to a traitorous rebellion are anti-American.

quote:

I mean it's not like all the Muslim statues going up, silently across the country ... it's not like this is anything comparable to what ISIS is doing to the history of Syria right now, is it? Tearing down old Christian monuments because, well, they don't like them ... they find them offensive to Allah and all.


I don't know anyone who objects to Christian, or Muslim for that matter, monuments on private property. It's the intrusion of religion, any religion, into government that is illegal and to be resisted with all vigor.

quote:

You cannot white wash a history of a region, or a country, just because you find certain past aspects of it offensive.


Putting the Confederacy's history into museums is not eliminating it, nor rewriting it. That's the proper place for it. In public places, however, a message exists of support for the ideas of the losing side, who were anti-American.

Confederate cemeteries are, for the most part, on private land beyond the legal reach of anyone who might have objections to them, which would be silly IMO.

quote:

But people in this region should still be allowed to retain some semblance of their culture and tradition, retain their honor.


They certainly can with appropriate venues. Public places are not appropriate.

Lexington is planning to move all of our Confederate monuments to a museum. They'll make an interesting field trip for kids studying Kentucky and American history.
This post was edited on 2/5/16 at 8:46 pm
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

That the United States became the leader of the world is hardly nonsense. When it began may be opinion but fighting a civil war to end slavery helped make this country more powerful and willful than any other.



I don't disagree with this statement at all, but that is not what you said the first time.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

A socialist, really a communist, is garnering all the brainwashed white guilt millennial vote
Crazy arse old white man hyperbole

quote:

We're doing EXACTLY what the religious fanatics in Syria and Lybia are doing
Or possibly closer to the germans destroying nazi monuments

quote:

Slaves were going to be freed ... it was already happening in the South. Modern machinery was taking over
Well that one is correct. I guess the thing about a hundred monkeys with typewriters is correct. If you type enough shite you are bound to get something right.

quote:

Southerners were pissed that they were being taxed to death to build canals in New York and Federal Buildings in DC
Sometimes I wonder what universe you exist in
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

I don't disagree with this statement at all, but that is not what you said the first time.


Disagree. I stated my opinion that the Civil War was the beginning of American influence on the world.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37599 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

They certainly can with appropriate venues. Public places are not appropriate.

Lexington is planning to move all of our Confederate monuments to a museum. They'll make an interesting field trip for kids studying Kentucky and American history.


I don't necessarily disagree with this.

I think I was fairly clear ... the problem I have is with it being removed and melted down for scrap. The problem I have is with the double-standard, the hypocrisy.

If we're talking strictly about winners and losers here then that's never really been the American way ... at least not in wars fought in other countries.

We allowed the Japanese to keep their emperor after WWII, did we not?

At the same time, I'll ask this question again ... name the only time in American history where we allowed a general to rape, pillage and burn during a campaign ... and then honored him for it.

Or would you prefer I name the times Americans have been court marshaled for doing anything even remotely similar in an effort to prove my point about the hypocrisy and the double standard.

Thus my other contention in this thread ... fine, remove the Confederate memorials if you must, but do not vandalize them in the process and do not disrespect them.

And remove the Union memorials ... remove the statue of Sherman in Central Park ... or either move Wall Street and our major Federally funded banks outta NYC.

Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Disagree. I stated my opinion that the Civil War was the beginning of American influence on the world.


No, you said it was "cemented by the civil war". Had you said (as you did here) that it was the beginning I wouldn't have challenged the statement one bit.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139838 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

It's the intrusion of religion, any religion, into government that is illegal


But that is not how the law is written. It has been misinterpreted that way much like everyone believes you have freedom of speech.

Now you can argue that deprecation of Church and State yet the Founfing Fathers again are referring to the Church of England as their guide.
This post was edited on 2/5/16 at 9:05 pm
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

At the same time, I'll ask this question again ... name the only time in American history where we allowed a general to rape, pillage and burn during a campaign ... and then honored him for it.


Genteel war is an oxymoron. War is obscene and the Civil War was total war.
Obscenities abounded.

I don't like memorials to any war but I'm not part of the majority opinion so I have to accept them.

Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter