Started By
Message

re: It's way past time to overhaul our education system

Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:36 am to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:36 am to
Tenure is a far secondary problem to government regulations, IMO. One problem child will utilize more school resources and impinge the process of a class far more than a bad teacher.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:39 am to
quote:

People either forget or don't believe that for the most part negative/shitty people will drag down their surroundings.

And it prevents the kids who wish to learn from learning. I'd guess many schools spend 30%+ of their resources on ~1% of their students.

We have schools driven by psychiatrists and lawyers. Neither of whom should be taken seriously on any subject of life for more than 5 minutes.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:39 am to
quote:

One problem child will utilize more school resources and impinge the process of a class far more than a bad teacher.



Indeed. This is one area where I may lose some of my liberal stripes. Get the problem kids out of the classroom and send them to alternative school, lawsuits be damned.
Posted by hogfly
Fayetteville, AR
Member since May 2014
4639 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:39 am to
Consider this:

LINK /

quote:

Because social class inequality is greater in the United States than in any of the countries with which we can reasonably be compared, the relative performance of U.S. adolescents is better than it appears when countries’ national average performance is conventionally compared.

Because in every country, students at the bottom of the social class distribution perform worse than students higher in that distribution, U.S. average performance appears to be relatively low partly because we have so many more test takers from the bottom of the social class distribution.
A sampling error in the U.S. administration of the most recent international (PISA) test resulted in students from the most disadvantaged schools being over-represented in the overall U.S. test-taker sample. This error further depressed the reported average U.S. test score.
If U.S. adolescents had a social class distribution that was similar to the distribution in countries to which the United States is frequently compared, average reading scores in the United States would be higher than average reading scores in the similar post-industrial countries we examined (France, Germany, and the United Kingdom), and average math scores in the United States would be about the same as average math scores in similar post-industrial countries.
A re-estimated U.S. average PISA score that adjusted for a student population in the United States that is more disadvantaged than populations in otherwise similar post-industrial countries, and for the over-sampling of students from the most-disadvantaged schools in a recent U.S. international assessment sample, finds that the U.S. average score in both reading and mathematics would be higher than official reports indicate (in the case of mathematics, substantially higher).
This re-estimate would also improve the U.S. place in the international ranking of all OECD countries, bringing the U.S. average score to sixth in reading and 13th in math. Conventional ranking reports based on PISA, which make no adjustments for social class composition or for sampling errors, and which rank countries irrespective of whether score differences are large enough to be meaningful, report that the U.S. average score is 14th in reading and 25th in math.
Disadvantaged and lower-middle-class U.S. students perform better (and in most cases, substantially better) than comparable students in similar post-industrial countries in reading. In math, disadvantaged and lower-middle-class U.S. students perform about the same as comparable students in similar post-industrial countries.
At all points in the social class distribution, U.S. students perform worse, and in many cases substantially worse, than students in a group of top-scoring countries (Canada, Finland, and Korea). Although controlling for social class distribution would narrow the difference in average scores between these countries and the United States, it would not eliminate it.
U.S. students from disadvantaged social class backgrounds perform better relative to their social class peers in the three similar post-industrial countries than advantaged U.S. students perform relative to their social class peers. But U.S. students from advantaged social class backgrounds perform better relative to their social class peers in the top-scoring countries of Finland and Canada than disadvantaged U.S. students perform relative to their social class peers.
On average, and for almost every social class group, U.S. students do relatively better in reading than in math, compared to students in both the top-scoring and the similar post-industrial countries.
Because not only educational effectiveness but also countries’ social class composition changes over time, comparisons of test score trends over time by social class group provide more useful information to policymakers than comparisons of total average test scores at one point in time or even of changes in total average test scores over time.

The performance of the lowest social class U.S. students has been improving over time, while the performance of such students in both top-scoring and similar post-industrial countries has been falling.
Over time, in some middle and advantaged social class groups where U.S. performance has not improved, comparable social class groups in some top-scoring and similar post-industrial countries have had declines in performance.
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 8:41 am
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:40 am to
IMO testing is where it gets complicated. I don't like the idea of teaching towards a standardized test but I also don't want teachers at lower levels doing their own thing.
We need some standards across the board, but we need teachers that can show students how to reach those standards through alternate routes.
I agree with the levels you have laid out the problem is it doesn't seem to work that way. Its almost all just spit back facts with very little critical thinking. The issue is most standardized test aren't the best for critical thinking.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:41 am to
What's your takeaway there? If we throw out the poor people's scores, we're doing ok?
Posted by hogfly
Fayetteville, AR
Member since May 2014
4639 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:41 am to
It's not the fault of the education system. It's the economic system.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:42 am to
We're getting away from that with Common Core.

You wouldn't believe it though given the vitriol those opposed to Common Core have been using.

Not that Common Core is perfect, but it's better than what we were doing.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:42 am to
I disagree, Excellent teachers and great teachers might be able to work around the bloated gov problem. The issue is you can't expect every teacher to be great. The good ones might work around it some but not get the results they could be if we fixed other parts as well. The school/student side is going to be easier to correct than the parent side.
Posted by hogfly
Fayetteville, AR
Member since May 2014
4639 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:43 am to
Common Core, at heart, is fine. It's the implementation of Common Core through Big Testing consortiums like PARCC that is where things are going awry.

They're creating the disease and selling you the cure. That's their game, and they're getting rich as hell off of it.
Posted by BillyBobPorkin
Stump Toe, Ar
Member since May 2014
1082 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:43 am to
quote:

You realize you're parroting a union argument here, right?


Absolutely! I hate unions, but some laws (GW Bush's No Child Left Behind) are just fricking stooooopid.


The system will never get fixed until gov't gets serious about the educating our society. If we have to hold parents accountable, then lets start there.

If kids are continuously disrupting class, then lets send them to juvenile detention and their release will be based on conduct and meeting academic goals.

My vision is that students will get to go to schools based on GPA, and if you are in a one school district hick town, then segregate those students in house.

I know this is kind of done by kids taking AP classes or general classes, but lets go full bore with it.

frick peoples feelings, lets educate.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

It's not the fault of the education system. It's the economic system.

You're inserting stuff into that study that isn't there.
Posted by BillyBobPorkin
Stump Toe, Ar
Member since May 2014
1082 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

It's not the fault of the education system. It's the economic system.



So you can't learn if you poor?
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:44 am to
I don't know enough about common core to really get into it. I haven't fully looked at it even though I've seen some crazy ways of trying to explain the math. It really doesn't solve what i was saying, unless i have it wrong it just presents a different method not all the routes to solve a problem. That would just be rerouting students from one method to another, I am talking more along the lines of showing students 2,3,or however many ways we can arrive at an answer.
Posted by hogfly
Fayetteville, AR
Member since May 2014
4639 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:46 am to
On the contrary:

quote:

The performance of the lowest social class U.S. students has been improving over time, while the performance of such students in both top-scoring and similar post-industrial countries has been falling.


My point is that our performance isn't as bad as "reformers" try to make it out to be.
Posted by KSGamecock
The Woodlands, TX
Member since May 2012
22982 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:47 am to
Unions made this country you fricktwit, they may suck now but they were instrumental in forming the country we have today back in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:47 am to
quote:

If kids are continuously disrupting class, then lets send them to juvenile detention and their release will be based on conduct and meeting academic goals.

Agreed, with some tweaking. Your idea is too much like prison for kids. I'd say a kid who is physically violent on an ongoing basis is expelled from public school. We can't save everyone. Trying to save everyone keeps the ones who want to learn from learning.

quote:

My vision is that students will get to go to schools based on GPA, and if you are in a one school district hick town, then segregate those students in house.

Not a fan of tracking or segregating by intellectual "ability."

And while NCLB is much reviled, it is an attempt to bring accountability to schools and as such, is completely appropriate.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:48 am to
quote:

My point is that our performance isn't as bad as "reformers" try to make it out to be.

So you're ok with 20-30% of kids in urban schools reading at grade level? Thuper.

Ignore all the poor kid's stats. They don't count.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Indeed. This is one area where I may lose some of my liberal stripes. Get the problem kids out of the classroom and send them to alternative school, lawsuits be damned.

No child left behind is one of the dumbest things in our education system. Once we get over the belief that everyone is equal great things can be accomplished.

We should not be sacrificing the top of the class to save the bottom. While we try to save the bottom it causes the top to get bored and also hurts the middle level. Problem kids should be sent out right way and to alternative schools, dumb kids should either be held back or get help after school.
This where my ideas for people in Belles' role kick in with pushing kids towards a skill. It stops them from hurting the rest of the class and even provides them with a chance to make something out of themselves.
Posted by hogfly
Fayetteville, AR
Member since May 2014
4639 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:49 am to
China approves of this plan!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter