Started By
Message

re: Does anyone actually believe this

Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:27 pm to
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

I thought... "In the Beginnning" God created like earth and the Universe and shite.... and then created light and the first day.


As in he made space and time and the rock we live on and some time later decided to actually get back to it and then the 7 days stuff happens.

It's all confusing, like trying to keep Dr. Who facts straight.


Confusing indeed. Welcome to the thread.

Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119244 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

If I feel something powerful, you will be the first to know, I promise. At this moment I can't bring myself to believe, but will remain with open mind and heart.


Sounds good. Each person has to reach their beliefs in their own way and own time. I will say that Christ compels us to seek Him.

I may have misunderstood the context of the other evidence you were asking for. I thought you were looking for other writers who talked about Jesus, whether contemporaries or not.

Taticus wrote: Nero fastened the guilt . . . on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of . . . Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome.

Pliny wrote: They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food--but food of an ordinary and innocent kind

Josephus wrote: About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he . . . wrought surprising feats. . . . He was the Christ. When Pilate . . .condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared . . . restored to life. . . . And the tribe of Christians . . . has . . . not disappeared

Babylonian Talmud:
On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald . . . cried, "He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy.

Let's examine this passage. You may have noticed that it refers to someone named "Yeshu." So why do we think this is Jesus? Actually, "Yeshu" (or "Yeshua") is how Jesus' name is pronounced in Hebrew. But what does the passage mean by saying that Jesus "was hanged"? Doesn't the New Testament say he was crucified? Indeed it does. But the term "hanged" can function as a synonym for "crucified." For instance, Galatians 3:13 declares that Christ was "hanged", and Luke 23:39 applies this term to the criminals who were crucified with Jesus.

Lucian wrote: The Christians . . . worship a man to this day--the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. . . . [It] was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:30 pm to
The problem with all of those accounts is: Which of them was contemporary? As in: Which of them was in the time of Jesus, and not just a reference to his followers and what they said?

This is referred to Hearsay, not to be confused with Heresy.
Posted by JustinBieberFan
Missouri
Member since May 2014
899 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:33 pm to
I thought y'all agreed to disagree a long time ago

Stacked I'm pretty impressed with how knowledgable you are on the subject especially for a guy who I thought spent 99% of his time on ebaumsworld.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

Stacked I'm pretty impressed with how knowledgable you are on the subject


Posted by JustinBieberFan
Missouri
Member since May 2014
899 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:36 pm to
You mad?
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119244 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

This is referred to Hearsay, not to be confused with Heresy





Religious discussions rarely end well for anyone, and they are even harder on a message board, where you are typing and not discussing across a cup of coffee.

Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

You mad?


No, I'm appreciating your attempt, though. If I hadn't been on the internet for such a long time, I might have fallen for it.
Posted by DanMullins4Life
Member since Oct 2012
3168 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:41 pm to
Anyone in here enjoy crying with their Daddy?

My Daddy was also a fundamentalist of atheism, who also taught English in Mexico City.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

Religious discussions rarely end well for anyone, and they are even harder on a message board, where you are typing and not discussing across a cup of coffee.


Those are where the best discussions take place. I was never a big fan of coffee until recently, but I make sure to drink it in moderation.
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:42 pm to
You need help
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

You need help
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46511 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Science is a religion, so is Atheism.


It annoys me when people say this.

Religion, by definition, requires the worship of a deity. Worshipping idols or an idea (not that scientists worship science, but we'll just go with it here) is not religion.

quote:

re·li·gion noun \ri-'li-j?n\
: the belief in a god or in a group of gods

: an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies, and rules used to worship a god or a group of gods
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 8:49 pm
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

Science is a religion, so is Atheism.


It annoys me when people say this.



Be careful when touching on this one, that's almost ubiquitously recited by trolls and people who are usually pulling a Poe.
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:51 pm to
You have an affinity for stating "some scholars believe" and then claiming it as fact. No matter the case, you can't say that all other writers other that Paul are anonymous.

quote:

Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are just the, you know. The Gospels. Which talk about Jesus


What do you mean Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are "just the, you know. The Gospels which talk about Jesus"? They are books of the New Testament not written by Paul that were written by identified writers.

quote:

the consensus is that [luke and acts] was composed by a (Koine)

The consensus? Care to identify this consensus? The only consensus I've ever heard is that Luke is the author of both.

Mathew wrote Matthew and it isn't disputed.

Mark wrote Mark.

John wrote John, 1st, 2nd, 3rd John and Revelation.

James wrote the book of James. It starts with "Greeting - James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, To the twelve tribes in the Dispersion." Sue me for believing the book is written by James. (And for the record, I do believe it's authored by the half brother of Jesus, making it even more important that he identifies himself as a servant of the Lord Jesus Christ.)

Peter wrote 1st and 2nd Peter.

Jude wrote Jude and I've never heard it remotely questioned.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46511 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

I believe what I believe and you can't change my mind nor I yours.


While this may be true for you, the fact is that intelligent discussion and research has led millions of people throughout history to change their views on religion one way or the other.

It is a worthwhile discussion if everyone involved can be civil about it. If there is a God and he can be known, it is worthwhile to discover him. If there is no God and someone is wasting their time, money and energy worshipping one that is worth discovering as well.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46511 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Mathew wrote Matthew and it isn't disputed.


Not that it really matters, but it is disputed...heavily in fact. All four gospels were written by unknown authors and the names ascribed to them are only what they are because of church tradition. Nobody referred to Matthew as "The Gospel of Matthew" until at least 150 AD.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 9:00 pm to
Stacked, where is your evidence?

Mine is: www.earlychristianwritings.com

I've given you the text here in the forum, it's now time for you to do some research for yourself.

I really can't give this any more on a silver platter to you. If you're not keeping up to date with contemporary criticism, you can't keep up with the conversation and it's just that simple.
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Stacked I'm pretty impressed with how knowledgable you are on the subject especially for a guy who I thought spent 99% of his time on ebaumsworld.


I absolutely do spend 99% of my time on Ebaumsworld. Even though I hate these types of conversations, mostly because I've had them too many times and want to never waste my energy on any of them ever again, Stacked has a Theology degree and some things are a pet peeve I can't help but take a nibble on a hook for. I've never concerned myself with people who disagree with me, for the reason that I may be the one who's wrong and we're all pretty much guessing, but don't go saying simple stuff like Paul's the only identified new testament writer because "some scholar" believes so when you don't believe half the other shite that same scholar says.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Not that it really matters, but it is disputed...heavily in fact. All four gospels were written by unknown authors and the names ascribed to them are only what they are because of church tradition. Nobody referred to Matthew as "The Gospel of Matthew" until at least 150 AD.


I really don't know where Stacked is getting his information.

Kent Hovind, maybe?
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter