Started By
Message

re: Arkansas judge making sexist, racist comments on TD/SECr identified

Posted on 3/5/14 at 11:57 pm to
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

Amen. Hope he reads this.


I hope he doesn't.

I hope he's given up message boards and the like for as long as he's actively practicing law.
Posted by Arkla Missy
Ark-La-Miss
Member since Jan 2013
10288 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 12:27 am to
On second thought, I agree, Tbird. You're so right.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 12:40 am to
I feel validated, not gonna lie
Posted by Arkla Missy
Ark-La-Miss
Member since Jan 2013
10288 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 1:01 am to
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25239 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 5:44 am to
He even put Judge in his TD name?
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 3:48 pm to
wow, Judge Maggio made Yahoo News today - admitted he posted that stuff.


LINK


ETA: Damn, he on ABC News and Washington Post too.
This post was edited on 3/6/14 at 4:00 pm
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42621 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

wow, Judge Maggio made Yahoo News today - admitted he posted that stuff.


LINK



FINISH HIM. /mortal combat

Seriously, talking about an adoption and one involving a public person at that. Does he know how wrong that is?! It would be bad and a HUGE ethical breach if the people mentioned were no names but the effects of mentioning someone who already deals with paparazzi and reporters dissecting their lives causes even more serious consequences when something that's supposed to be under seal is violated.

If you reveal details of Jane Smith from Lower Iowa adoption proceedings people won't know for sure who it is (still very, very wrong) and they'll forget about it but if you go talking about the very private and legally SEALED details of a celeb or public figure everyone will know who it is, the press will go wild, and the story never goes away. Celeb X can't escape the story - can't wait for people who think they have it figured out to lose interest they way Jane Smith can.
Posted by GoldenDawg
Dawg in Exile
Member since Oct 2013
19087 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I hope he's given up message boards and the like for as long as he's actively practicing law.


His "active practice of law" may not be too active in the near future if this is true ...
quote:

including one in which he revealed alleged details of confidential proceedings involving actress Charlize Theron's adoption of her son.

That will get him, a) sued, and b) disbarred.

Not necessarily in that order.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

including one in which he revealed alleged details of confidential proceedings involving actress Charlize Theron's adoption of her son.


He gone
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35609 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 4:24 pm to
It's disgusting he was electable in the first place.

That poor of an effort to cover his tracks coupled with the terrible grammar. Shame Arkansas! Shame!
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42621 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 4:42 pm to
quote:


That will get him, a) sued, and b) disbarred.

Not necessarily in that order.


He deserves it too. Judges and lawyers with any sense typically save their stories for one another just like doctors, nurses, police, EMTs, professors, and so on often do and even then names and identifying details are often omitted to protect the individual or individuals (and while in some fields you're not supposed to even talk broadly it's understood that this happens and is ok because talking within the field to others in the profession maintains 'radio silence'). And the reason they only talk shop with one another is because they all know it's privileged info they can't reveal and won't reveal to the public.

You don't go to a message board and talk shop when you're in a field where you have an ethical or legal obligation to protect privacy.

Even a school teacher would get into serious trouble for talking about something as trivial as little Tommy Smith pulling Susie's hair and landing in detention or even little Joey Jones being so hyperactive he's a handful because it's understood that this is not to spoken of publicly.
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23179 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 5:09 pm to
I saw that he dropped out of the race to focus on his family and healing and forgiveness. He owned up to everything and apologized.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 5:20 pm to
that is pretty standard if you ever want to try and revive your career.
Posted by betweenthebara
nowhere
Member since May 2013
6183 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Because literally every LSU fan thinks using “Geaux” is the height of clever.


Truth.
Posted by Jerry the Sailor
Member since May 2013
933 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 8:24 am to
quote:

How can a judge have such horrible grammar?


This is the bigger issue to me. fricking idiot.

I have no problem with him being allowed to have, and semi-anonymously voice, his own opinions. He's human -- that's natural.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:00 am to
Well at least it wasn't hookers and blow, just message board post about women and Arkansas
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260191 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 11:16 am to
quote:


Even a school teacher would get into serious trouble for talking about something as trivial as little Tommy Smith pulling Susie's hair


Not even close.

They guy was an idiot for publicly stating his opinions. Right or wrong, he should have kept it close to the vest. We live in a country with "approved" speech.

Anyone with their feelings hurt over what he said has more serious problems, but he wasn't the brightest bulb considering his career and future endeavors.
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 11:21 am to
He is correct about the parents who give their kids stupid names. 99% of the time they are indeed guaranteed a life time slot at the bottom of the barrel. Nothing wrong with that assertation.
Posted by Joe Blow
Member since Nov 2007
2631 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 11:39 am to
From his statement...
quote:

I would ask you to respect my family’s need for privacy so we can being the healing process of forgiveness.

He obviously doesn't care about other people's privacy, so why the frick should others care about his?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260191 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 11:42 am to
quote:

He is correct about the parents who give their kids stupid names. 99% of the time they are indeed guaranteed a life time slot at the bottom of the barrel. Nothing wrong with that assertation.


I agree with him there. It's damn near a form of child abuse. Don't name your kid after some off ramp motel chain. Everyone thinks this privately...but...not wise to do in his position.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter