Started By
Message
re: Arguments against Gay marriage
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:19 am to MSUbulldogs03
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:19 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
The other doesn't take advantage of the opportunity at a life desired by the sterile person.
Many gay people do better. They adopt instead of creating more of an overpopulation.
2
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:19 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
Literally as soon as I posted that I knew I worded it wrong and should have used water works/shtting on one another/S&M or something along those lines.
Word. Everyone has a different line when it comes to deviant or perverse sexual behavior. I just always cringe at the comparisons of homosexuality and beastiality or pedophilia.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:22 am to CatFan81
Ijust find it to be absolutely absurd that my two gay friends who have been together, in a monogamous relationship, since high school and are now in their 30's can't get married. I, only being with my SO for five years, can any time that I would want to. Being straight doesn't make me more important than them.
Some dumb fricks who meet in Vegas can get married the same night, but many loving same sex couples can't. There's a huge problem with that logic.
Some dumb fricks who meet in Vegas can get married the same night, but many loving same sex couples can't. There's a huge problem with that logic.
This post was edited on 2/10/15 at 10:23 am
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:22 am to CatFan81
quote:
They adopt instead of creating more of an overpopulation.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:23 am to Hardy_Har
I don't see why you find that to be funny.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:25 am to CatFan81
Reporducing isn't creating an overpopulation.. Having 8 kids that you and I support with tax money is, but not all reproduction. You just made a pretty dumb blanket statement is all..
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:25 am to CatFan81
Answer this for me.
Why is it that people can't disagree with a lifestyle, but just be tolerant of it?
Why is it that people can't disagree with a lifestyle, but just be tolerant of it?
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:28 am to Hardy_Har
I guess. There are always going to be welfare queens popping out babies every year though.
Oh, did I mention that they can get married if the want as well? But two gay men or women, with successful careers, fully capable of caring for children and in a very stable relationship can't.
Oh, did I mention that they can get married if the want as well? But two gay men or women, with successful careers, fully capable of caring for children and in a very stable relationship can't.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:28 am to CatFan81
quote:Dont think you'll find anyone who disagrees with this. But do you really think if same sex marriage were legal in Vegas that two dumb gay fricks who meet in Vegas won't get married the same night?
Some dumb fricks who meet in Vegas can get married the same night, but many loving same sex couples can't. There's a huge problem with that logic.
In the church's eyes marriage has already lost so much reverence from heterosexuals (divorces/annulments) that they are trying to preserve it as much as possible.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:29 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
Why is it that people can't disagree with a lifestyle, but just be tolerant of it?
Wanting marriage to be only between a man and a woman isn't being tolerant of gay people.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:30 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
Answer this for me.
Why is it that people can't disagree with a lifestyle, but just be tolerant of it?
I'm 100% okay with people disagreeing with homosexuality from a religious and/or personal moral standpoint, but to try and deny a human being benefits and rights based on who they love is despicable. Churches shouldn't be forced into performing same-sex marriages (though many are already willing to do so), but our government should recognize their union.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:30 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
Dont think you'll find anyone who disagrees with this. But do you really think if same sex marriage were legal in Vegas that two dumb gay fricks who meet in Vegas won't get married the same night?
Of course it would happen. The point is that if those people can get married, then two gay people in along term relationship should be able to do the same.
quote:
In the church's eyes marriage has already lost so much reverence from heterosexuals (divorces/annulments) that they are trying to preserve it as much as possible.
We don't live in a theocracy. The church doesn't get to make the laws.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:30 am to CatFan81
quote:Wanting to impose into someone's religious beliefs is the exact opposite of tolerance.
Wanting marriage to be only between a man and a woman isn't being tolerant of gay people.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:31 am to CatFan81
I couldn't care less either way I guess. It doesn't bother me that they can in some states, just like it doesn't bother me that they cannot in Mississippi..
Gay marriage is just hard to get behind.
Gay marriage is just hard to get behind.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:32 am to CatFan81
quote:There would be no marriage without the church. So yes, they should get to make the laws on something they created.
The church doesn't get to make the laws.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:33 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
Wanting to impose into someone's religious beliefs is the exact opposite of tolerance.
You choose your sky daddy. You don't choose to be gay. Religion isn't a valid excuse for intolerance. Fourty years ago, zealots were using the same shite to prevent interracial marriage.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:33 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
There would be no marriage without the church. So yes, they should get to make the laws on something they created.
Marriage existed long before the church.
If that was the case, no one would be allowed to get married except for straight Christians.
This post was edited on 2/10/15 at 10:34 am
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:34 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
Wanting to impose into someone's religious beliefs is the exact opposite of tolerance.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:34 am to Hardy_Har
quote:ISWYDT
Gay marriage is just hard to get behind.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:34 am to CatFan81
quote:
Wanting marriage to be only between a man and a woman isn't being tolerant of gay people.
Where in my fricking question did I say that?
Page 4 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News