Started By
Message

re: Arguments against Gay marriage

Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:34 am to
Posted by Supravol22
Member since Jan 2011
14411 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:34 am to
BECAUSE THEYRE DIFFERENT THAN ME
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69901 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:35 am to
quote:

There is no valid argument when religion isn't used. Hell, religion isn't even a valid argument, as we do not live in a theocracy.

They can't reproduce? Well, neither can the infertile couple or the elderly couple who found the person that they want to marry late in life. Should they not be allowed to be married?

You think it's gross? Well, I think two nasty morbidly obese people together are fricking gross, but I'm not trying to tell them that they can't get married.

It's not "biologically correct?" Tell that to the thousands of species in which same sex copulation is naturally occurring.

You're scared that it'll turn your kids gay? When did you decide to be straight? You don't turn gay. You either are or aren't.





TL;DR shut up catfan
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:37 am to
I'm only against gay marriage if the couple is colored.
Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:42 am to
quote:

The honest answer is perversion. Society hates to say that because that would make homosexuality "wrong", but its the truth. I believe homosexuality exists the same reason beastiality or pedophiles exist (not saying homosexuality is as bad as beastiality/pedophiles just using it as an example). People get their rocks off to different stuff.


Go home. You're drunk. Same sex copulation is naturally occurring throughout the animal kingdom.

quote:

it still goes against all living things biological purpose. Survive/evolve/reproduce.


Tons of straight people don't want children. Plenty more can't have children. My guess is that you don't view them in the same light.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:45 am to
quote:

The honest answer is perversion. Society hates to say that because that would make homosexuality "wrong", but its the truth. I believe homosexuality exists the same reason beastiality or pedophiles exist (not saying homosexuality is as bad as beastiality/pedophiles just using it as an example). People get their rocks off to different stuff.



Why use beastiality or pedophilia? Those two examples involve lack of consent from one side.

What are some heterosexual perversions between two consenting heterosexuals? Oral sex? Anal sex? S&M?
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Go home. You're drunk. Same sex copulation is naturally occurring throughout the animal kingdom.


So is murder, rape and torture -- let's not use the animal kingdom as our barometer.

It's not normal statistically speaking, even in the animal kingdom. Clearly there is a biological/psychological difference...that certain elements within the liberal wing try to sort of sweep under the carpet.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55241 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:46 am to
What are you so full of hate? Why can't others feel differently than you?
Posted by MSUbulldogs03
Member since Apr 2013
2644 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Tons of straight people don't want children. Plenty more can't have children. My guess is that you don't view them in the same light.

Infertility is not the natural state of a healthy organism. So by your comparison, you view homosexuals as unhealthy?
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Why use beastiality or pedophilia? Those two examples involve lack of consent from one side.

What are some heterosexual perversions between two consenting heterosexuals? Oral sex? Anal sex? S&M?


All of them are technically sexual deviations from the norm -- while not directly analogous they do fall into the category of statistical minority (by a long shot).

Perversion is the wrong word to use, I think, and religiously charged to some degree.
Posted by MSUbulldogs03
Member since Apr 2013
2644 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:48 am to
quote:

What are some heterosexual perversions between two consenting heterosexuals?
Literally as soon as I posted that I knew I worded it wrong and should have used water works/shtting on one another/S&M or something along those lines.
Posted by MSUbulldogs03
Member since Apr 2013
2644 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:55 am to
quote:

So is murder, rape and torture -- let's not use the animal kingdom as our barometer.
Ive seen animals eat their own shite. Does that make it okay if someone decides to start eating their own feces?
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46384 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:58 am to
Do you catch footballs with a baseball glove?
Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Infertility is not the natural state of a healthy organism. So by your comparison, you view homosexuals as unhealthy?


No. I was simply saying that neither relationship can produce offspring, but one is looked down upon and the other is generally not.
Posted by kage
ATL
Member since Feb 2010
4068 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Ive seen animals eat their own shite. Does that make it okay if someone decides to start eating their own feces?


More power to em if they want to.


My dog eats cat shite all the time. Drives me crazy.
Posted by Hardy_Har
MS
Member since Nov 2012
16285 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Same sex copulation is naturally occurring throughout the animal kingdom.


1. We're not animals. I've never seen a gay dude eat the arse out of a dead animal, pee a circle around a stump for no reason then hump his boyfriend.

2. These animals you're referring to still reproduce with opposite sex animals.

3. There's a new Brewery in Jackson called Lucky Town Pub beer. shite is awesome. BOLO
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28859 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Its just not biologically correct. Humans as well as all living things only purposes are to survive and reproduce. Homosexuality completely disrupts the our biological purpose. With that being said, however, I couldn't care less how somebody else decides to live their life so long as it doesn't affect me.

What grinds my gears is many people don't just want tolerance, they want to change people's way of thinking that being gay is a good thing. I can be tolerant of something and still not agree that it is right.



this is where i parked my subaru.
Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:12 am to
quote:

We're not animals


Yes we are. We're just very advanced animals.
Posted by MSUbulldogs03
Member since Apr 2013
2644 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:15 am to
Because sympathy is seen for the "unhealthy" sterile person who wants kids but can't produce. The other doesn't take advantage of the opportunity at a life desired by the sterile person.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28859 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Same sex copulation is naturally occurring throughout the animal kingdom.



dumbest argument in the history of dumb arguments. there is no animal in history that chooses homosexual sex for life when there is a viable option from the opposite gender. it is always in the sustained absence of the opposite sex.

also, animals eat their own and engage in genocide and beat each other to death for mating. that's not a part of the love cycle i think humans need to emulate.

that's like saying since stonehog can't get laid, he's just naturally a homo.
This post was edited on 2/10/15 at 10:18 am
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:17 am to
quote:

We're not animals


Yes we are. We're just very advanced animals.


She's actually right on this one but -- nonetheless -- we don't ever go to them for morality, I have no idea why we should start right now.

I think the gay community has the biggest buffer on these kinds of things.

Like transsexual operations -- I think it's the only time when psychiatrists actually suggest that a patient delves deeper into their illness.

They don't prescribe scalpels to people who cut, why the change in treatment for people who fall into the LGBT sphere?

This is within that scope, they just can't even be called different.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter