Started By
Message

re: Roundtable on Sportscenter about decline of A&M

Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:42 pm to
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37623 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:42 pm to
You can't even compete with Clemson, Notre Dame, Alabama or even Arkansas as of late but continue to tell us how you're so good.

Very few if any football programs across this nation respect or care about lsu
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65453 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

You can't even compete with Clemson, Notre Dame, Alabama or even Arkansas as of late but continue to tell us how you're so good

I don't think you even know what "compete with" means.
quote:

Very few if any football programs across this nation respect or care about lsu


keep telling yourself that and maybe it will come true
This post was edited on 5/9/16 at 4:44 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80944 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

I've no idea where TAMU ranks all time, though.


17
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70973 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Very few if any football programs across this nation respect or care about lsu



because you're so well traveled
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65453 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

17

so lower than LSU. thanks
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70973 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:45 pm to
so LSU was better than TAMU, even before Saban?
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37623 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:46 pm to
Well LSU is like 14th or 15th all time in wins while have the entirety of LA to yourself.

If Saban had not came along you would literally be worse than Ole Miss all time.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70973 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Well LSU is like 14th or 15th all time in wins while have the entirety of LA to yourself.





quote:

If Saban had not came along you would literally be worse than Ole Miss all time.



literally? You sure?
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
30616 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Roundtable on Sportscenter about decline of A&M



When your top achievement is a 3rd place SEC West finish is it even feasible to call it a decline?
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65453 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

If Saban had not came along you would literally be worse than Ole Miss all time.

I don't think you know what literally means either. LSU has jumped 2 or 3 spots all-time since Saban arrived. Ole Miss is 52nd all-time in winning %
This post was edited on 5/9/16 at 4:52 pm
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34346 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

maybe A&M is just a mediocre program and always has been


Maybe trying to change that is why we spent half a billion on buildings and why we joined the SEC.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70973 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:51 pm to
dammit man, I wanted to actually see his response
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37623 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:52 pm to
So you jumped from where A&M is now up 2-3 spots.

Amazing. I wish I could live in Louisiana and wear purple
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80944 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

so LSU was better than TAMU, even before Saban?


Let's take a look:

Before Nick Saban took over prior to the 2000 season, LSU was 610-356-47

Prior to the 2000 season, Texas A&M was 603-386-48.

LSU had 7 more wins than A&M did prior to Nick Saban taking over. Since then, that gap has widened to 53 games.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37623 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:53 pm to
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70973 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:54 pm to
Using the wins and losses logic, you'd say Yale is literally a better football program than LSU and TAMU?
Posted by tickfawtiger
Killian LA
Member since Sep 2005
11006 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:54 pm to
OK...you're correct, aggie IS,WAS and will be better than LSU in all things FOREVER....happy now jr. ?
Now go away and let the grown ups talk ! LOL
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65453 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

So you jumped from where A&M is now up 2-3 spots.

all-time winning percentage, LSU is currently 14th. Texas A&M is 26th. Total wins LSU is 12th. A&M is 16th. LSu is historically a better program than Texas A&M, always has been, and they've separated themselves even further the last 15+ years. You weren;t even alive the last time LSU was a bad program, so I don't know why we're even having this discussion
This post was edited on 5/9/16 at 4:55 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80944 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:55 pm to
I never stated that A&M was a better historical football program than LSU.

My point was that the gap is far wider now than it was before Saban arrived.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37623 posts
Posted on 5/9/16 at 4:56 pm to
Yes. Comparing Ivy League to SEC/SWC is rational thought.

You're a wizard
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter