Started By
Message

re: Why doesn't Jeremy Johnson run the ball?

Posted on 9/2/14 at 10:42 am to
Posted by gsm1060
Tree stand
Member since Dec 2009
683 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 10:42 am to
By your logic why the hell didn't they bring in Marshall after one of the failed 3rd and shorts. Clearly Marshall was out for the first half. Therefore no running from Johnson. We didn't want Wallace running the show until the 2nd half.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 11:11 am
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105510 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 10:58 am to
quote:

By your logic why the hell didn't they bring in after one of the failed 3rd and shorts.


wut?
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38038 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:21 am to
quote:

By your logic why the hell didn't they bring in Marshall after one of the failed 3rd and shorts. Clearly Marshall was out for the first half.


No, he wasn't "clearly" out for the first half.

Know how I know that?

Because Gus "clearly" said he WASN'T.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter