Started By
Message

re: Next Phenomenal, Predominant, SEC Team?

Posted on 6/12/13 at 11:21 pm to
Posted by Nortizzle
Posibarner™ Captain
Member since Nov 2006
23170 posts
Posted on 6/12/13 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

Hey it's you

it is!
Posted by Gardevoir
Member since Jun 2013
1880 posts
Posted on 6/12/13 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

What the frick?

If you mean "who was understood to be the dominant team in the SEC by Week 7" then...

2009: Florida, duh. Alabama was still considered the challenger, Florida was the destined repeat.

2010: I think we knew when Florida and Alabama had both been defeated, LSU was struggling against the likes of McNeese State and Vanderbilt and Auburn had just rallied big and looked like a team destined to win that Auburn was the team to beat that year.

2012: Uh... Alabama? How is this a question? Yeah you had a lot of teams in the hunt, but you had two unbeatens by this point (Alabama and Florida), one of these teams was the defending national champion, the other was coming off back-to-back .500 seasons. Pretty obvious who the frontrunner was.

2008 I'll give you, after Ole Miss upset Florida and Alabama upset Georgia, we didn't know who would come out on top. Turned out to be Alabama and Florida, but neither team was the clear-cut people's favorite.

No, I meant that after week 7, we should have a good idea if a team this upcoming season might join the 3 I listed.

quote:

21-0

Let's not get sidetracked. That game's existence alone is controversial, and it may not be a good idea to use that game to strengthen my claim regarding the 2011 Crimson Tide defense.

quote:

2014 Gamecocks. Gun Blazin', Cock Slangin', and Rock Smashing. But seriously, we'll be really good.

I hear that 2014 is Florida's year too. We'll see. I know several teams will be starting new quarterbacks, and that is not a position that you just "reload" at. 2014 will be a very interesting year, but we may get a predominant team this year.

quote:

Because they fricking won the game?

They didn't win those games in predominant fashion. 2009 Tennessee was blown out by Ole Miss and Virginia Tech, teams that Alabama had beaten convincingly. 2009 Auburn was blown out by Arkansas and LSU, teams that Alabama had beaten. Why should Alabama struggle against unranked rivals when opponents they'd already beaten by fair or convincing margins blew Auburn or Tennessee out?

quote:

Gardevoir is a Pokemon For this year, I really don't think there will be a team that is just much better than everyone else. Based on the Top 10 finishes last year by SEC teams, it's hard to see one team dominating another. Sure, Alabama may easily win it again, but they will probably face some tough challenges.

It's nice to meet someone who recognizes the name. Gardevoir was one of my favorite Pokemon as a child. I agree with you and think that we'll have a better idea after the October 12th games.

Sorry for the slow responses, but the SEC RANT could really use a multiple quote button.
Posted by K9
wayx....BOBO IN '19
Member since Sep 2012
24077 posts
Posted on 6/12/13 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

A phallus. Consume one and perish, please.








THATS GOLD JERRY! GOLD!!
Posted by thatdude1985
Oxford, AL
Member since Oct 2011
27038 posts
Posted on 6/12/13 at 11:46 pm to
ok, I'll explain the rivalry performances.....sometimes in the sport of CFB rivalries are close.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61382 posts
Posted on 6/12/13 at 11:58 pm to
2010-Auburn?

2009- Alabama?

WTF brah, you left out 2 MNC teams.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18191 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 12:01 am to
quote:

Florida: If it weren't for an uncharacteristic showing against Ole Miss


This makes no sense. We always beat Florida.
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 1:17 am to
quote:

This is not a flame thread.



quote:

You may want to look up the meaning of the word "predominant" before you post an argument.


frick off, tool.
Posted by FourThreeForty
Member since May 2013
17290 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 1:57 am to
Lol Gardevoir is mostly female Pokemon from the 3rd generation. Something tells me this guy should have posted in the gaming board first.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 2:50 am to
quote:

and it may not be a good idea to use that game to strengthen my claim regarding the 2011 Crimson Tide defense.
Yeah, because they really sucked that night..
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145261 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 3:04 am to
i dont know where it will rank all time, but our 2014 team will be fricking salty if manziel comes back
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 6:36 am to
quote:

I took the word uncharacteristic from the Wikipedia game summary.
plagiarism. You're gonna get expelled.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
21699 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Predominant, SEC Team?


Predominantly what?

This not meant to be a flame, but you're stupid.
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 7:26 am to
Pretending to be a Bama fan was dead giveaway. LSU fans are cute if nothing else.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72256 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 7:37 am to
2009: A 14-0 team with wins over 10 bowl teams wasn't dominant?
Posted by TupeloReb
Member since Nov 2012
10743 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 7:42 am to
As long as Saban is there Alabama will be dominant
Posted by dlc83
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
1829 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:17 am to
I think Georgia is ready to finally get over the hump and start contending for Nat Championships.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32805 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:24 am to
21-0
Posted by Indfanfromcol
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
14740 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:39 am to
This might just be me, but the only time I can remember where I'd watch a team and no matter who the opponent was, I knew the team would win was in 2011 for both LSU and Bama. With the exception of when they played each other, I knew each team would win their games and it not be close.

I really can't remember a time besides that when I knew without a doubt a team would win every game.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37764 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:42 am to
quote:

2014 Gamecocks.

Gun Blazin', Cock Slangin', and Rock Smashing.

But seriously, we'll be really good.


Great minds think alike - I've been saying 2014 was going to be our dominant season for awhile now, at least the past two years.

But I think if we go undefeated through those first five games this year, and then make it past Florida at home, then we have a chance to have a very special year, this year as well.



Posted by Settingthestandard
Titletown USA 2
Member since Apr 2013
521 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:58 am to
So the 2011 LSU team was the only great team of the bunch? I kinda stopped reading after I saw that breakdown. 2011 LSU offense was average at best. You left that out. Won big games with big special teams play and defense. No different than the Alabama's Florida's and Auburns who all had weaknesses.
Also, remember rivalry games (true rivals not the ones where it's just called one by TV) tend to be closer than the oddsmakers call it. The last 2 years no, but more often than not, both teams show up to play. Truly phenomenal team of BCS era without a weakness anywhere? You'd have to go back to 2001 Miami.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter