Started By
Message
re: Which football program is greater historically: Texas A&M or Arkansas?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:56 am to Bench McElroy
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:56 am to Bench McElroy
20 pages
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:58 am to khaos288
quote:
A&M???? not so much, can't remember one big time national game they had until this season
You can't remember a big national A&M game and you remember Texas/Arky games that were important?
Selective memory. lol
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:00 am to khaos288
It comes with an asterisk. The SWC was basically a dying conference in the late '80s, early '90s ala the Big East so that winning percentage is greatly inflated. The SWC was far stronger in the '60s when Arkansas was dominating than it was during the time Texas A&M was winning big.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:00 am to Bench McElroy
Texas A&M always has been below us, and I expect them to remain that way in the future.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:01 am to Bench McElroy
As a UF fan: Who has the better record since 1990?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:02 am to Arkansasrazorback
quote:
Texas A&M always has been below us, and I expect them to remain that way in the future.
Damn. So much swagga in this post. I wholeheartedly approve.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:04 am to Bench McElroy
A better question is what is was the better program in 1999: A&M or LSU?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:04 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
The SWC was basically a dying conference in the late '80s, early '90s ala the Big East so that winning percentage is greatly inflated. The SWC was far stronger in the '60s when Arkansas was dominating than it was during the time Texas A&M was winning big.
Bench knows football.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:05 am to Bench McElroy
One thing older Aggies hate admitting is that almost everytime in the SWC there was something on the line when Arkansas and A&M played, Arkansas won.
We ruined several seasons for A&M. Can't remember which one we beat them to take away their shot at a Natty.
We ruined several seasons for A&M. Can't remember which one we beat them to take away their shot at a Natty.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:07 am to Bench McElroy
Well done sir, Well done.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:07 am to Bench McElroy
excellent thread.
oh and arkansas.
oh and arkansas.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:12 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
Case for Texas A&M
Got the gay.
quote:
Case for Arkansas
We straight.
We win/better.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:13 am to Hawgeye
TAMU. Arkansas can't win conference titles.
And it will be worse going forward. No self-respecting Texas kid wants to go to that shite hole to play football. And the only good football players coming out of Arkansas are those with retard strength that only their inbreeding can provide.
And it will be worse going forward. No self-respecting Texas kid wants to go to that shite hole to play football. And the only good football players coming out of Arkansas are those with retard strength that only their inbreeding can provide.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:15 am to BennyAndTheInkJets
Since integration up until we left the SWC Arkansas had a better win pct during that time.
Since integration and up until now, both teams have won 63% of their games. Keep in mind, aTm continued to play in the SWC until 1996 while Arkansas joined a tougher league in 1992.
In the AP poll era, Arkansas is 538-338-20
aTm is 474-369-26(41 wins 1992-95 SWC)
Since integration and up until now, both teams have won 63% of their games. Keep in mind, aTm continued to play in the SWC until 1996 while Arkansas joined a tougher league in 1992.
In the AP poll era, Arkansas is 538-338-20
aTm is 474-369-26(41 wins 1992-95 SWC)
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:16 am to BigD Ag
quote:
No self-respecting Texas kid wants to go to that shite hole to play football.
Funny you say that because Kyle Field is a literal shithole. I was at the game this year, the entire stadium smelled like rancid arse juice, and when I asked what the smell was they told me it was bat guano.
This post was edited on 12/27/12 at 10:18 am
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:16 am to Bench McElroy
In the past? It is debatable. Moving forward it won't be.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News